Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Arista is ranked #26. Cisco holds a 9.8% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Wireless

Read 154 Cisco Wireless reviews

8,848 Views
8,671 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

686 Views
665 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Wireless

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks compete in the enterprise wireless networking category. Mojo Networks appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment.

Features: Cisco Wireless offers robust security, a scalable infrastructure, and thorough management options, making it ideal for comprehensive network control. It is also easy to set up and reliable. Mojo Networks highlights cloud-based capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and offers comprehensive analytics and security, alongside an intuitive plug-and-play setup suitable for organizations without extensive IT resources.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Wireless could enhance its competitive pricing and simplify configurations. Improvements in compatibility with third-party products and integrating AI features for automated management are desired. Mojo Networks, now part of Arista, could improve by consolidating management platforms, expanding API capabilities, and enhancing device compatibility support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Wireless is primarily deployed on-premises, valued for direct control, although the architecture can complicate setup. Technical support is generally responsive. Mojo Networks offers flexible deployment options, including cloud-based solutions, and is favored for easy setup. While support is satisfactory, improvements in speed and consistency are needed.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Wireless is seen as a premium investment with complex licensing and additional costs. While the ROI is positive due to its stability, the cost remains a concern. Mojo Networks offers a cost-effective approach, with lower initial costs and competitive subscription options, often yielding excellent ROI for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

154

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 9.8%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Wireless	9.8%
Mojo Networks	0.6%
Other	89.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

EvansEsezobor

Group IT Head at Euracare

Has enabled centralized user management and improved wireless access point aggregation

To improve Cisco Wireless, the ports on the access points are all 100 Meg, not 1 gig. We have not gotten a gigabyte interface of about 1,000, but the controller we have is just 1 gig. We would prefer if we could increase the controller to a 10 gig interface because we want to connect our controller to a 10 gig interface, which currently limits us to 1 gig. When we want to move higher capacity data via wireless, it limits us to 1 gig.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is excellent."

"Cisco Wireless is mostly stable with a low downrate and the signal rate is good. It is also easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless are security and the ability to manage everything easily. Other solutions, such as Aruba are not as simple."

"It is a reliable and robust solution. Access and Mobility Groups are useful. We don't use anything very fancy."

"Cisco Wireless is highly stable."

"This product has a long life and you don't have any issues with it."

"Cisco's support team is the best in the industry."

"Cisco is one of the leading vendors and is at the top of many lists. The access software is robust, and the performance of the devices is excellent."

More Cisco Wireless pros

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."

"The solution is very stable."

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"There should be an option for a wireless bridge that can be used to join two access points."

"There is room for improvement regarding HA issues and Radius integration."

"The new GUI interface and the newer version OS are a little bit more complex than the older version, however, it just might take some getting used to."

"Improvements can be made to the telemetry. The licensing gets in the way here. It makes it impossible to record the different flows across the wireless network."

"The solution doesn't have much coverage area."

"Controllers could be improved."

"The biggest reason why we could no longer continue with Cisco Wireless was because of the high cost to upgrade everything. It was disappointing that Cisco treated us as just another big company, and did not offer any leeway on their pricing given that we are an educational institute. And although the system we had in place from Cisco Wireless was good enough over the last ten years, it started to show its age when pushed to its limit during the pandemic."

"The internet speed is high within environments. As you move further away from the access point, there is a decline in speed. Omada or Ruckus don’t have the speed degradation as you move away from the access point."

More Cisco Wireless cons

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive, but you get value for your money."

"However, when you integrate the access point and the controller with the DNAT across multiple sites, you need a DNAT cluster, which is a costly solution. Every site has a controller, and a DNAT cluster is not a good option in a global framework. It's okay for a small office or a few offices. But when you're talking about 500 offices, the cost becomes enormous."

"The price of this solution is a little more than competitors."

"Expensive."

"I am not a fan of Cisco's software pricing model. Their management software is far too expensive."

"It's expensive because a lot of the controls come with licenses."

"Its licensing is hard to understand."

"It's expensive. The pricing is an obstacle."

More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	77
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	74

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 27% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 22% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Wireless Competitors

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 12% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 12% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 11% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless

January 2026

Download Cisco Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

January 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

Cisco WLAN Controller

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Cisco

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.