Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs MarkLogic comparison

Cloudera and Progress Software are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Cloudera is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while Progress Software is ranked #19. Cloudera holds a 3.3% mindshare in ND, compared to Progress Software’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cloudera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Cloudera Distribution for H...

Read 51 Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop reviews

1,935 Views
581 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MarkLogic

Read 4 MarkLogic reviews

400 Views
344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudera Distribution for H...

MarkLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and MarkLogic are solutions in the Big Data and database management sectors. Cloudera shows an advantage in scalability and integration, while MarkLogic provides strong data handling capabilities for enterprises needing advanced data management.

Features: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers robust scalability, a comprehensive ecosystem, and strong capabilities for big data analytics. MarkLogic focuses on agility, semantic search, and the ability to manage complex datasets natively, beneficial for rapid data processing and transformation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudera benefits from extensive community support and documentation, which aids businesses with existing Hadoop infrastructure. MarkLogic provides innovative deployment options and superior customer service, simplifying setup for companies prioritizing customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudera offers a cost-effective solution with its open-source nature, supporting gradual ROI. MarkLogic presents a higher investment but tends to deliver quicker ROI for enterprises focused on complex data operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudera Distribution for H...

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (2nd)

MarkLogic

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is 3.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MarkLogic is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop	3.3%
MarkLogic	2.0%
Other	94.7%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Rok Dolinsek

Manager, Bussines Development & Co Owner at Troia d.o.o.

Enables on-premise implementation with powerful data processing capabilities

This is the only solution that is possible to install on-premise. Cloudera provides a hybrid solution that combines compute on cloud or on-premises. It includes all machine learning algorithms in the Spark machine learning library. All functionalities needed for a big data platform and ETL are on the platform, eliminating the need for other tools. It is scalable, ready for vertical scaling, and very powerful, offering numerous functionalities and configurations for generative AI.

Read full review

Dixit Singla

Staff Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Search workflows have become faster for complex data while cloud-native flexibility still needs work

I think MarkLogic can be improved by providing good cloud infrastructure. Since we are in a very tech era, MarkLogic should provide good cloud infrastructure. If you look at other databases or systems like Kafka and MongoDB, they have cloud infrastructure. You do not need to worry about maintaining your own servers or provisioning your own servers. You simply log in and tell MarkLogic you want a certain number of clusters or nodes in a cluster and what cloud provider you want to use, then click okay, and they will build it for you. That is a headache with MarkLogic. Apart from that, I don't see any issues. It is a really great product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is Impala, the querying engine, which is very fast."

"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."

"Cloudera provides a hybrid solution that combines compute on cloud or on-premises."

"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."

"The product as a whole is good."

"The product is completely secure."

"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."

"We also really like the Cloudera community. You can have any question and will have your answer within a few hours."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop pros

"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."

"We moved to MarkLogic and created the API using JavaScript server-side language, and we saw almost 60% improvement in the speed of the search."

"MarkLogic has positively impacted my organization by making everything quick and fast, and I believe that is a major change we have seen here."

"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

Cons

"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."

"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."

"If they could support modifying the data more easily than the current implementation, it would be beneficial."

"The dashboard could be improved."

"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."

"The competitors provide better functionalities."

"The solution is not fit for on-premise distributions."

"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop cons

"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

"MarkLogic's scalability is very bad. In production, when you get to know that your data is increasing and you need to add one more node, that is not easy and not straightforward."

"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudera requires a license to use."

"The tool is expensive...For the SMB market or customers whose environments are not that complex and do not have multiple systems running, Cloudera might not be a good option."

"I believe we pay for a three-year license."

"It is an expensive product."

"The solution is fairly expensive."

"The pricing must be improved."

"The price is very high. The solution is expensive."

"The tool is not expensive."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop pricing and cost advice

"MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

The price for Cloudera is average, yet it is very good compared to other solutions. It can be deployed on-premises, unlike competitors' cloud-only solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

If they could support modifying the data more easily than the current implementation, it would be beneficial.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Data Fabric vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 15% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EMR vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 11% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 9% of the time

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs MarkLogic

Compared 31% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs MarkLogic

Compared 20% of the time

SingleStore vs MarkLogic

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MarkLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Cassandra vs MarkLogic

Compared 11% of the time

More MarkLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

January 2026

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2026

Download MarkLogic product report

Overview

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is the world's most complete, tested, and popular distribution of Apache Hadoop and related projects. CDH is 100% Apache-licensed open source and is the only Hadoop solution to offer unified batch processing, interactive SQL, and interactive search, and role-based access controls. More enterprises have downloaded CDH than all other such distributions combined.

Cloudera

MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

Progress Software

Sample Customers

37signals, Adconion,adgooroo, Aggregate Knowledge, AMD, Apollo Group, Blackberry, Box, BT, CSC

ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley

Buyer's Guide

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic

December 2025

Free Report: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.