Top 10 MarkLogic Alternatives

Name: MarkLogic
Brand: Progress Software
Rating: 4.4 (4 reviews)

Vendor: Progress Software

4.4 out of 5

4 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top MarkLogic Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to MarkLogic based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, and Cassandra. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. MarkLogic surpasses its competitors by offering a powerful multi-model database that excels in handling complex data integration, real-time analytics, and enterprise-grade security, making it ideal for organizations seeking robust data management and agile performance solutions.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

MarkLogic excels with data integration, security, and strong customer support, offering cost-effectiveness for those focused on data-centric solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides global distribution and automatic scaling, appealing to buyers needing expansive feature sets and scalability.

Download MarkLogic vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

MarkLogic has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, which offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

MarkLogic has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, which offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers cost-efficient deployment and strong community support, appealing to dynamic application developers. In comparison, MarkLogic provides comprehensive features for complex data models with robust search capabilities, attracting enterprises needing high-end functionality despite higher initial costs.

Download MarkLogic vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Report

Pricing

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers a straightforward setup cost, while MarkLogic presents a more complex pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers a straightforward setup cost, while MarkLogic presents a more complex pricing structure.

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra offers scalability and high availability beneficial for distributed data management. In comparison, MarkLogic provides advanced data handling and integration suitable for complex data formats. Tech buyers choose Cassandra for cost-effective scalability and MarkLogic for comprehensive features with professional support.

Download Cassandra vs. MarkLogic Report

Pricing

Cassandra has a lower setup cost compared to MarkLogic, which offers more robust infrastructure options at a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Cassandra has a lower setup cost compared to MarkLogic, which offers more robust infrastructure options at a higher initial expense.

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera attracts tech buyers with its robust open-source Hadoop ecosystem, offering comprehensive management tools for cost-effective scalability. In comparison, MarkLogic appeals with enterprise-grade features like real-time search and multi-model capabilities, ensuring efficient integration of structured and unstructured data.

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic Report

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop requires significant initial setup cost, while MarkLogic offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop requires significant initial setup cost, while MarkLogic offers a more cost-effective setup.

Neo4j Graph Database

4.3 out of 5

Neo4j Graph Database

4.3 out of 5

MarkLogic offers versatility with a multi-model database suited for complex environments. In comparison, Neo4j's graph technology excels in data relationships, perfect for specific applications. Tech buyers choose MarkLogic for affordability and multi-modal capabilities, while Neo4j attracts those needing specialized graph features.

Download MarkLogic vs. Neo4j Graph Database Report

Pricing

MarkLogic's setup cost is higher, offering extensive enterprise solutions, whereas Neo4j Graph Database presents a more economical choice with a lower setup cost, accommodating those needing a cost-effective graph database solution.

View comparison

Pricing

CouchDB

1 out of 5

CouchDB

1 out of 5

Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.

View comparison

Related categories

NoSQL Databases

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Managed NoSQL Databases