Collibra Lineage vs erwin Data Intelligence comparison

Collibra and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Collibra is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0. Collibra holds a 2.8% mindshare in DG, compared to Quest Software’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Collibra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Collibra Lineage

Read 10 Collibra Lineage reviews

1,330 Views
1,330 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

erwin Data Intelligence

Read 18 erwin Data Intelligence reviews

3,040 Views
3,040 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Collibra Lineage

erwin Data Intelligence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 19, 2025

erwin Data Intelligence and Collibra Lineage compete in the data governance and metadata management category. erwin seems to have the upper hand due to its robust customization and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in metadata and data lineage.

Features: erwin Data Intelligence offers automation capabilities that reduce time-to-market, supports metadata management, and features an extensive data lineage system. Its Smart Data Connectors enhance code engineering and data governance. Collibra Lineage excels in mapping data flows with automated and manual creation options, offering an intuitive setup for both technical and business users. Its flexible APIs support seamless tool integration.

Room for Improvement: erwin Data Intelligence could enhance its SDK and API functionalities, streamline complexity, and improve AI compatibility with diverse data modeling solutions. Collibra Lineage needs more connector options, better reporting, simpler configuration processes, and an enhanced pricing structure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: erwin Data Intelligence is available for on-premises and cloud use, providing reliable but sometimes variable technical support. Collibra Lineage, available for hybrid, private, and public cloud deployment, is praised for its effective support teams and potentially superior deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: erwin Data Intelligence is competitively priced, attracting buyers with its value against competitors and delivering substantial ROI through automation efficiency. Collibra Lineage offers flexible licensing but may be costlier, particularly for smaller businesses, though both solutions promise significant ROI through reduced development times and enhanced data governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Lineage

Ranking in Data Governance

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Data Intelligence

Ranking in Data Governance

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Collibra Lineage is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Prabhjyot Singh

Data and Analytics Manager at BMO Financial

Faster and more efficient than manual methods or other tools like Informatica

The main differences between Collibra Lineage and Informatica are significant, particularly for small to mid-sized organizations. First, Informatica requires a dedicated team, which incurs a huge cost, making it less suitable for smaller organizations. Second, Informatica's tools are very scattered. For instance, to create a domain, you need to use Axon, and then for lineage, you must use EDC. For profiling, Informatica Developer or Analyst is required. These different tools are not well-connected to display everything on one screen. While Informatica is trying to improve with its cloud version, not many users have adopted it yet. These are the two main areas where Informatica lags.

Read full review

Roy Pollack

Advisor Application Architect at CPS Energy

The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.

We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with other Collibra Lineage products is valuable in our data governance initiatives."

"The best features of Collibra Lineage include its ability to map data flows and provide clear visualizations."

"The solution allowed us to quickly and efficiently implement our data governance operating model, including accountabilities, regulatory lineage, and data dictionaries. This was much faster and more efficient than manual methods or other tools like Informatica. I prefer Collibra Lineage for its self-service capabilities."

"The main benefits that Collibra Lineage provides include measurable advantages."

"The solution has very good online assistance."

"The most valuable features of Collibra Lineage are the multiple options for automation. Additionally, if you have a scenario where automation does not work, you have the option to manually create the lineage. The solution does not force you to always go through an automated way where you have broken lineage and you are stuck without a lineage."

"It shows how the data was transformed on the way and how the solutions were derived. This is the essence of the tool and why it is so powerful."

"We find the most valuable feature of this solution to be the lineage aspect."

More Collibra Lineage pros

"There is a wide range of widgets that enables the user to find the proper information quickly. The presentation of information is something very valuable."

"The data management is, obviously, key in understanding where the data is and what the data is. And the governance can be done at multiple levels. You have the governance of the code sets versus the governance of the business terms and the definitions of those business terms. You have the governance of the business data models and how those business data models are driving the physical implementation of the actual databases. And, of course, you have the governance of the mapping to make sure that source-to-target mapping is done and is being shared across the company."

"Mind map... is a really good feature because it is very helpful in seeing which column's tables are related. Also, you can flag them with "sensitive data" and other indicators. You can also customize your own features for the mind map. That was another very robust feature."

"Data Intelligence creates a single source of truth for all of our metadata. This solution is better for data warehousing, but the metadata features speed up our development work. It's easy to create and manage mappings because we can export them to Informatica and pick up the work where we left off."

"Data Intelligence allows us to automate multiple tasks we had previously done manually, such as restructuring the metadata for our purposes, setting up ETL flows, and defining the data tables we create. It also enables us to standardize our approach and our technical processes."

"We use the codeset mapping quite a bit to match value pairs to use within the conversion as well. Those value pair mappings come in quite handy and are utilized quite extensively. They then feed into the automation of the source data extraction, like the source data mapping of the source data extraction, the code development, forward engineering using the ODI connector for the forward automation."

"The interface is easy to use. I also like Erwin's automatic data classification and data quality checks."

"The biggest benefit with erwin DI is that I have a single source of truth that I can send anybody to. If anybody doesn't know the answer we can go back to it. Just having a central location of business rules is good."

More erwin Data Intelligence pros

Cons

"Collibra Lineage could improve connectively. If they can offer more out-of-the-box connectors, which come as in a package compared to you having to go and buy a lot in the marketplace for certain specific connectors."

"I experience occasional downtime, bugs, and some glitches."

"We would like this solution to be able to connect directly to the databases, so we can pull directly from Databank without manual intervention."

"It would be better if features like the privacy module and AI-based Collibra DQ were included in one package instead of being separate and requiring additional costs. Currently, the basic package covers lineage and documentation, but the extra modules come at an extra cost."

"I have seen many customers moving away from Collibra Lineage after using it for a couple of years because the cost-benefit analysis does not give them a favorable report."

"The workflow documentation must be improved."

"Before you can use this solution, you have to make a lot of changes to how you measure your information in your organization, the data governance and policies, and the organizational structures that use them. Many companies believe that if they purchase the licenses for the tool that they have done the job, but this is far from the case with this tool."

"If a developer implements ETL in Glue or PySpark, Collibra cannot capture lineage out of that."

More Collibra Lineage cons

"Really huge datasets, where the logical names or the lexicons weren't groomed or maintained well, were the only area where it really had room for improvement. A huge data set would cause erwin to crash. If there were half a million or 1 million tables, erwin would hang."

"There may be some opportunities for improvement in terms of the user interface to make it a little bit more intuitive. They have made some good progress. Originally, when we started, we were on version 9 or 10. Over the last couple of releases, I've seen some improvements that they have made, but there might be a few other additional areas in UI where they can make some enhancements."

"The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering."

"There was a huge learning curve, and I'd been in software development for most of my career. The application itself, and how it runs menus and screens when you can modify and code, is complex. I have found that kind of cumbersome."

"One big improvement we would like to see would be the workflow integration of codeset mapping with the erwin source to target mapping. That's a bit clunky for us. The two often seem to be in conflict with one another. Codeset mappings that are used within the source to target mappings are difficult to manage because they get locked."

"There is room for improvement with the data cataloging capability. Right now, there is a list of a lot of sources that they can catalog, or they can create metadata upon, but if they can add more then that would be a good plus for this tool."

"It's a little bit clunky. I think a lot of these features were bolted on, and they don't necessarily transition smoothly in the interface. I would like to see a little more cohesion."

"Everything about Data Intelligence is complex. Though we've used the tool for five years, we're still only using about 30 to 40 percent of its capabilities. It would be helpful if we could customize and simplify the user interface because there are so many redundant things."

More erwin Data Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive, especially for small companies."

"There are different licenses available for Collibra Lineage based on what kind of access you want. If you want, for example, a read-only license they have different ones to pick from."

"The licensing cost was very affordable at the time of purchase. It has since been taken over by erwin, then Quest. The tool has gotten a bit more costly, but they are adding more features very quickly."

"The solution is aggressively priced."

"erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors."

"The whole suite, not just the DI but the modeling software, the harvester, Mapping Manager — everything we have — is about $100,000 a year for our renewals. That works out to each module being something like $8,000 to $10,000."

"erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."

"erwin was at a good price. The federal government wouldn't buy something if the pricing wasn't good."

"Smart Data Connectors have some costs, and then there are user-based licenses. We spend roughly $150,000 per year on the solution. It is a yearly subscription license that basically includes the cost for Smart Data Connectors and user-based licenses. We have around 30 data stewards who maintain definitions, and then we have five IT users who basically maintain the overall solution. It is not a SaaS kind of operation, and there is an infrastructure cost to host this solution, which is our regular AWS hosting cost."

"There is an additional fee for the server maintenance."

More erwin Data Intelligence pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Collibra Lineage?

The solution makes data more discoverable and transparent.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Collibra Lineage?

The licensing cost depends on our requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Collibra Lineage?

There are areas of improvement in Collibra Lineage, including pricing, support, and reporting. Regarding pricing, it is somewhat expensive, and I think it could be more cost-efficient.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 74% of the time

MANTA Flow vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 9% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 4% of the time

OneTrust DataGovernance vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 3% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 3% of the time

More Collibra Lineage Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence

Compared 34% of the time

Collibra Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence

Compared 25% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs erwin Data Intelligence

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs erwin Data Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs erwin Data Intelligence

Compared 6% of the time

More erwin Data Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage

August 2025

Download Collibra Lineage product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Intelligence

August 2025

Download erwin Data Intelligence product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance

Overview

Data lineage reveals how data transforms through its life cycle across interactions with systems, applications, APIs and reports. Collibra Lineage automatically maps relationships between data to show how data sets are built, aggregated, sourced and used.

Collibra

Erwin Data Intelligence drives automation, supports data catalog and literacy, and offers Smart Data Connectors for efficient metadata handling. Its customization flexibility and integration facilitate enhanced data governance, visualization, analysis, and compliance.

Erwin Data Intelligence offers automation scripts that accelerate development, integrated data cataloging, data profiling, and lineage analysis to streamline information management. Users appreciate its capability in metadata harvesting, code engineering, and infrastructure integration. The tool provides flexibility to enhance governance and data visualization. While it performs well, users have noted challenges with API robustness and interface complexity, and there are opportunities to improve workflow integration, AI features, and large dataset handling. Companies rely on it for metadata management, automation of metadata mappings, and data governance to support compliance and literacy.

What are the main features of Erwin Data Intelligence?

Automation Scripts: Speeds up development processes through powerful scripts.
Data Catalog: Supports comprehensive data mapping and profiles for better analysis.
Smart Data Connectors: Efficiently handles code engineering and metadata harvesting.
Customization Flexibility: Adapts to existing infrastructure for seamless integration.
Comprehensive Visualization: Empowers data visualization and standardization processes.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Development Speed: Automation scripts notably enhance development efficiency.
Improved Data Governance: Streamlines processes, supporting compliance and business definitions.
Effective Integration: Seamlessly fits with ETL tools and existing workflows.
Enhanced Data Literacy: Supports data literacy initiatives with robust cataloging features.
Comprehensive Impact Analysis: Facilitates thorough analysis for informed decision-making.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, organizations implement Erwin Data Intelligence for efficient metadata management and governance. It assists in automating lineage and mapping, supporting ETL procedures while enhancing compliance and data literacy efforts. Its flexibility and integration support create valuable data insights and governance improvements.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence

July 2025

Free Report: Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Collibra Lineage vs. erwin Data Intelligence report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.