Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Comindware and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Comindware is ranked #42, while IBM is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. Comindware holds a 0.3% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Comindware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Comindware Tracker
Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews
  • 335 Views
  • 151 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 203 Views
  • 203 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Comindware Tracker are competing in business process management solutions. IBM stands out in complex integrations, while Comindware is favored for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced business process modeling, robust integration, and sophisticated analytics. Comindware Tracker is notable for its flexibility, seamless workflow automation, and easy customization without extensive coding.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and offer more affordable licensing options. Comindware Tracker can enhance analytics capabilities, provide more enterprise-level integration features, and improve scalability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker offers quick deployment with its cloud-based solution and is recognized for intuitive support. IBM WebSphere BPMS requires longer deployment due to complex configurations but provides extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires a higher initial investment, suitable for large-scale implementations with substantial ROI. Comindware Tracker is competitively priced, offering a lower initial cost with faster ROI through its flexible pricing structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
42nd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (45th)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
28th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SS
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
Read full review
CB
Developers gain flexibility to build custom controls with numerous integration options
Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases. Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented these features with IBM WebSphere BPMS. In recent versions, IBM has introduced some generative AI features, and we plan to migrate to the newer versions within approximately one year.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"Low code development."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
More Comindware Tracker pros
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
 

Cons

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
More Comindware Tracker cons
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is so reasonable."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Great value for the money."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"This solution has a very lost cost."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases. Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented t...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
IBM WebSphere BPMS allows users to build workflows and dashboards. It is a developer-friendly product. The product features a great UI interface that is mobile-friendly, tab-friendly, and desktop-f...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
Understanding the benefits and improvements that come with using the product is essential. IBM WebSphere BPMS is performing excellently, and I do not see any significant areas requiring improvement...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker
August 2025
Comindware Tracker reportDownload Comindware Tracker product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
August 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

  • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
  • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
  • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
  • Unified Document and Data Management
  • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
  • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


Comindware
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
July 2025
Free Report: Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.