CrowdStrike Falcon and ThreatLocker are competing in the cybersecurity and endpoint protection market. ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and pricing, making it a preferred choice for smaller enterprises seeking cost-effective solutions.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive threat detection utilizing advanced machine learning, real-time monitoring, and AI capabilities. It integrates extensively with other services, offering a lightweight agent suitable for enterprises looking for robust endpoint protection. ThreatLocker focuses on application allowlisting and zero-trust strategies, featuring ring-fencing and granular access controls that simplify user requests management and integrate smoothly with other systems.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon users have highlighted the need for easier query processes, improved support for legacy operating systems, and better module integration. Feedback also indicates challenges with its evolving GUI and complex policy changes. On the other hand, ThreatLocker users experience difficulties with staggered updates, learning curve challenges, and demand a more user-friendly interface. Both require process streamlining and feature expansion based on user feedback.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon offers broad adoption across diverse cloud environments, effectively supporting both on-premises and cloud models. While ThreatLocker provides similar flexibility, its emphasis is more on-premises and private cloud models. CrowdStrike's customer service varies in response times and technical expertise, whereas ThreatLocker users value direct communication and express a desire for quicker response times and improved ticket management systems.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is often perceived as expensive with diverse pricing models that may deter smaller businesses, though appreciated for its robust defense and community-driven threat intelligence. Conversely, ThreatLocker is praised for competitive and flexible pricing, seen as cost-effective by smaller enterprises. Both generate ROI through enhanced security and operational efficiencies, with user experiences and organization needs significantly influencing realized savings.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides AI-powered endpoint detection and protection with minimal system impact. Its real-time monitoring and cloud-native design support efficient threat analysis and integration with other platforms, enhancing security management and workflow.
CrowdStrike Falcon is renowned for its comprehensive cybersecurity features, offering automatic threat analysis and AI-driven protection. Users appreciate its cloud-native flexibility and seamless integration capabilities. Its real-time monitoring, incident response, and vulnerability assessment deliver detailed insights and threat intelligence. Despite its robust features, improvements in integration with other technologies, dashboard functionalities, log management, and support for outdated systems are desired. Enhanced reporting, detailed malware analysis, and reduced false positives can improve user experiences. Organizations leverage Falcon for endpoint protection, threat detection, ransomware defense, and forensic investigations with its effective AI capabilities.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In finance and healthcare, CrowdStrike Falcon is implemented to protect against advanced threats and ensure compliance. Its AI-driven capabilities aid in real-time threat detection and vulnerability management, making it an essential tool for companies aiming to secure sensitive data and maintain operational continuity. Manufacturing sectors utilize it for securing production systems against potential cyber threats, ensuring uptime and safety. CrowdStrike Falcon's adaptable architecture benefits these industries by providing reliable protection across varied operating environments.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.