Elastic Search vs Palantir Foundry comparison

Elastic and Palantir are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Elastic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Palantir is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Elastic holds a 1.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to Palantir’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Palantir users who would recommend it.

Elastic Search

Read 88 Elastic Search reviews

7,984 Views
639 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Palantir Foundry

Read 17 Palantir Foundry reviews

8,697 Views
1,652 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Elastic Search

Palantir Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Elastic Search and Palantir Foundry are contenders in the data analytics and integration space. Elastic Search is favored for its affordability and flexibility due to open-source availability, while Palantir Foundry's comprehensive platform offers enhanced data integration and security capabilities.

Features: Elastic Search offers scalability, ease of integration without specific data format adjustments, and real-time analytics capabilities enhanced with Kibana. This makes it ideal for log monitoring and quick incident response. On the other hand, Palantir Foundry provides end-to-end data integration and visualization, eliminating the need for multiple tools. Its platform facilitates seamless solution deployment with a strong focus on security and advanced data handling, suited for healthcare and engineering sectors.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Search could benefit from improved security in its open-source model and more intuitive alerting features. Complexity in machine learning functionalities and index management inefficiencies are noted drawbacks. Palantir Foundry's improvements could include cost reductions and enhanced documentation. Limitations in application development and high computational costs also indicate areas for development, especially to improve accessibility for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search allows deployment flexibility with various configurations supported by a robust community, though direct support may be costly and slow. Versatility in deployment environments emphasizes its adaptability. Palantir Foundry focuses on seamless cloud deployments and consistent technical support, yet users report the need for faster service responses. Its higher deployment costs highlight a trade-off for smoother integration.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search is generally cost-effective with open-source advantages, although premium features can add up. It offers favorable ROI through cost savings in deployment and operational efficiencies. Palantir Foundry presents a higher pricing model but aims to offset this with reduced labor costs due to platform unification. While Elastic Search attracts businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness, Foundry appeals to those valuing sophisticated data management at greater expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Indexing and Search (1st), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (2nd)

Palantir Foundry

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), IT Operations Analytics (10th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Data Migration Appliances (3rd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st), Data and Analytics Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Elastic Search is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 4.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Search	1.6%
Palantir Foundry	4.9%
Other	93.5%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vaibhav Shukla

Senior Software Engineer at Agoda

Search performance has transformed large-scale intent discovery and hybrid query handling

While Elastic Search is a good product, I see areas for improvement, particularly regarding the misconception that any amount of data can simply be dumped into Elastic Search. When creating an index, careful consideration of data massaging is essential. Elastic Search stores mappings for various data types, which must remain below a certain threshold to maintain functionality. Users need to throttle the number of fields for searching to avoid overloading the system and ensure that the design of the document is efficient for the Elastic Search index. Additionally, I suggest utilizing ILM periodically throughout the year to manage data shuffling between clusters, preventing hotspots in the distribution of requests across nodes.

Read full review

SRINIVAS RATHOD

Architect at L&T Technology Services

Finds security and customization features impressive, although cost concerns persist

My experience with Palantir Foundry and Azure has been good. Palantir Foundry is costly, but Azure is open, which allows for easier experimentation. Being a closed product, Palantir Foundry is difficult to practice offline unless we have an enterprise edition. However, it is very secure compared to other platforms. Palantir Foundry's best features include security, built-in features, low-code, no-code platform, and ease of use. The collaborative workspaces within Palantir Foundry contribute to team efficiency and project outcomes through seamless operation. The ease of customization is particularly notable. I have worked with the data lineage feature in Palantir Foundry, which comes by default. We simply need to tick the checkbox and make necessary configuration changes within the system itself. We do not need to procure another lineage platform as Palantir Foundry has its own built-in features for data lineage, data governance, and data security. The lineage feature helps enhance our data management practices by allowing us to understand the origin of data, track all activities happening on the data, identify users and consumers, and monitor how it flows across the system. This makes it easier to generate reports based on the lineage database. The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries. Using the AIP library within Palantir Foundry helps us develop quick resolutions for predictive models and analytics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The solution is quite scalable and this is one of its advantages."

"The initial installation and setup were straightforward."

"Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time analytics with Elastic benefits us due to the huge traffic volume in our organization, which reaches up to 60,000 requests per second. With logs of approximately 25 GB per day, manually analyzing traffic behavior, payloads, headers, user agents, and other details is impractical."

"The stability of Elasticsearch was very high, and I would rate it a ten."

"On the subject of pricing, Elastic Search is very cost-efficient, as you can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal."

"The products comes with REST APIs."

"I have found the sort capability of Elastic very useful for allowing us to find the information we need very quickly."

More Elastic Search pros

"I like the data onboarding to Palantir Foundry and ETL creation."

"I rate Palantir Foundry a ten out of ten."

"Great features available in one tool."

"It is easy to map out a workflow and run trigger-based scripts without having to deploy to another server."

"The solution provides an end-to-end integrated tech stack that takes care of all utility/infrastructure topics for you."

"The AI engine that comes with Palantir Foundry is quite interesting."

"The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries."

"It's scalable."

More Palantir Foundry pros

Cons

"Enterprise scaling of what have been essentially separate, free open source software (FOSS) products has been a challenge, but the folks at Elastic have published new add-ons (X-Pack and ECE) to help large companies grow ELK to required scales."

"The one area that can use improvement is the automapping of fields."

"Its licensing needs to be improved. They don't offer a perpetual license. They want to know how many nodes you will be using, and they ask for an annual subscription. Otherwise, they don't give you permission to use it. Our customers are generally military or police departments or customers without connection to the internet. Therefore, this model is not suitable for us. This subscription-based model is not the best for OEM vendors. Another annoying thing about Elasticsearch is its roadmap. We are developing something, and then they say, "Okay. We have removed that feature in this release," and when we are adapting to that release, they say, "Okay. We have removed that one as well." We don't know what they will remove in the next version. They are not looking for backward compatibility from the customers' perspective. They just remove a feature and say, "Okay. We've removed this one." In terms of new features, it should have an ODBC driver so that you can search and integrate this product with existing BI tools and reporting tools. Currently, you need to go for third parties, such as CData, in order to achieve this. ODBC driver is the most important feature required. Its Community Edition does not have security features. For example, you cannot authenticate with a username and password. It should have security features. They might have put it in the latest release."

"The documentation for Elastic Search can be challenging if you're not already familiar with the platform."

"There is another solution I'm testing which has a 500 record limit when you do a search on Elastic Enterprise Search. That's the only area in which I'm not sure whether it's a limitation on our end in terms of knowledge or a technical limitation from Elastic Enterprise Search. There is another solution we are looking at that rides on Elastic Enterprise Search. And the limit is for any sort of records that you're doing or data analysis you're trying to do, you can only extract 500 records at a time. I know the open-source nature has a lot of limitations, Otherwise, Elastic Enterprise Search is a fantastic solution and I'd recommend it to anyone."

"I found an issue with Elasticsearch in terms of aggregation. They are good, yet the rules written for this are not really good."

"Elasticsearch could be improved in terms of scalability."

"I think the pricing of Elastic Search is really, really expensive."

More Elastic Search cons

"The solution’s data security could be improved."

"It would be helpful to build applications based on Azure functions or web apps in Palantir Foundry."

"Some error messages can be very cryptic."

"The solution could use more online documentation for new users."

"It requires a lot of manual work and is very time-consuming to get to a functional point."

"Difficult to receive data from external sources."

"If you want to create new models on specific data sets, computing that is quite costly."

"The major hindrance with Palantir Foundry is that being a very closed product, the cost optimization and costing are not exposed to the end users."

More Palantir Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing structure depends on the scalability steps."

"The solution is not expensive because users have the option of choosing the managed or the subscription model."

"The tool is not expensive. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"We are using the open-sourced version."

"The solution is less expensive than Stackdriver and Grafana."

"We are paying $1,500 a month to use the solution. If you want to have endpoint protection you need to pay more."

"The pricing model is questionable and needs to be addressed because when you would like to have the security they charge per machine."

"The basic license is free, but it comes with a lot of features that aren't free. With a gold license, we get active directory integration. With a platinum license, we get alerting."

More Elastic Search pricing and cost advice

"The solution’s pricing is high."

"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."

"It's expensive."

"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?

Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?

Elastic Search's pricing totally depends on the server. Managed services from AWS are used, and we have worked on a self-managed Elastic Search cluster. On the AWS side, it is very expensive becaus...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?

To be honest, there is only one downside of Elastic Search that makes sense because we use a basic license, which is a free license. We do not have some features available because of the free licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?

Apart from the pricing and offline availability issues, improvements are needed in Palantir Foundry's costing factor. Cost-wise, it is not open for everybody, and they are not exposing anything out...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?

One of the leading European manufacturing plants uses Palantir Foundry for manufacturing interior parts of various car brands such as Honda, Hyundai, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW. This involves hig...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?

Palantir Foundry is an excellent product for data engineering. On a scale of one to 10, I would rate Palantir Foundry a 9.

See all answers

Comparisons

Xapien vs Elastic Search

Compared 15% of the time

Algolia vs Elastic Search

Compared 9% of the time

Azure AI Search vs Elastic Search

Compared 6% of the time

Milvus vs Elastic Search

Compared 5% of the time

Solr vs Elastic Search

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Search Competitors

Cognizant AI & Analytics vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 8% of the time

Confluent vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Gotham vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

SAP Data Services vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 2% of the time

More Palantir Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Search

January 2026

Download Elastic Search product report

Buyer's Guide

Palantir Foundry

January 2026

Download Palantir Foundry product report

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud

No data available

Overview

Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

Elastic

Palantir Foundry is an enterprise data management platform offering comprehensive tooling for working with big data. Because it is an operating system made for modern enterprises, it is highly available and a continuously updated platform.

Palantir Foundry is a fully managed SaaS platform that spans from cloud hosting and data integration to flexible analytics, visualization, model-building, operational decision-making, and decision capture. It equips technical and non-technical users to make data-driven operational decisions.

Palantir Foundry includes tools to integrate data of any scale, format, or structure, and also has granular, flexible access controls for individual datasets. In addition, it has an open, modular architecture with multiple RESTful APIs, it has native applications for developing machine learning and artificial intelligence, it provides sophisticated data science applications for users of all technical abilities, and much more.

Palantir Foundry Features

The most valuable Palantir Foundry features include:

Security, flexibility, interoperability, easy deployment, built-in role classification, purpose-based access controls, interoperable architecture, model integration, AI modeling tools, ontology, custom workflows, team-specific applications, self-serve analytics, lineage system, operational application building, 200+ data connectors, data versioning, change management framework, sand decision orchestration, and custom dashboard and report building tools.

With Palantir Foundry You Can:

Accelerate development & operations
Collaborate globally
Save time on security
Reduce costs

Palantir Foundry Benefits

Some of the many Palantir Foundry benefits include:

Modular: Because Palantir Foundry is modular, it can integrate with existing infrastructure.
Granular governance: Robust data governance controls help ensure seamless compliance, auditability, and security.
Secure data sharing: The security infrastructure allows you to share data securely, within organizations and with chosen partners.
Rapid integration: Palantir Foundry can rapidly integrate models and data from data platforms into an operational ontology, and can also fuel existing data platforms.
Stand-alone deployment: Palantir Foundry can be deployed standalone and can provide all necessary capabilities for data connection, data integration, and model building.
Prevent lock-in: The data and model integration suites are designed to prevent lock-in, and assume that tools will be interoperating with Palantir Foundry as an organization grows.
No SQL necessary: Users do not have to use SQL queries or employ engineers to write strings in order to search petabytes of data. With Palantir Foundry, natural language is used to query data and results are returned in real-time.
Excellent data integration: Palantir Foundry provides secure, scalable, and resilient integration of all data sources.
Availability: The Palantir platform uses DNS routing, gateways and elastic load balancing to ensure availability. Dedicated accounts and virtual resources are used on a per customer basis.
Multiple metrics types: The Palantir platform provides hundreds of metrics. Some include average session length, drop-off rate, number of logins per user, number of accounts, and search speed.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot users like Palantir Foundry because it has many advantages:

“It is user-friendly, good automation, and allows you to do a better job of data governance.” - Associate, Inhouse Consulting at a pharma/biotech company

“Works seamlessly with good end-to-end capabilities and the capability to scale.” - Wallace H., Sr. Director at a tech services company

Palantir

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry

December 2025

Free Report: Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Search vs. Palantir Foundry report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.