Snyk and FOSSA are both significant players in the field of security and compliance management, focusing on open-source software vulnerabilities and legal compliance, respectively. Snyk appears to have a slight advantage due to its extensive feature set, particularly in integration and vulnerability notifications, although both offer distinct benefits in their areas.
Features: Snyk offers simplicity and ease of integration with Slack notifications, a comprehensive vulnerability database, and container security features. It is especially appealing to development teams needing quick vulnerability alerts. FOSSA excels in dependency scanning, provides an out-of-the-box policy engine, and offers excellent interoperability with various developer ecosystems, making it ideal for open-source compliance management.
Room for Improvement: Snyk could enhance its offerings by adding more advanced scanning capabilities like SAST and DAST, refining its notification and reporting system, and expanding support for different languages to improve developer onboarding. FOSSA could focus on clearer documentation, a more comprehensive license list, and better issue identification and triage processes to bolster its service.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Snyk and FOSSA can be deployed across Private, Public, and Hybrid Clouds as well as on-premises setups. Snyk has a responsive support team, earning high ranks from users for their engagement, while FOSSA is noted for its immediate technical assistance, backed by a reliable account team. However, enhanced documentation and feature education could further improve both products' customer experience.
Pricing and ROI: Snyk is generally higher-priced, justified by its extensive features and developer-focused integrations, offering flexible licensing but with extra costs for features like SSO. It delivers recognizable ROI through quick vulnerability identification and reduced resolution times. FOSSA, competitively priced, is praised for reducing legal and compliance workloads significantly, although its pricing structure might not suit every organization. Both solutions underscore their worth in enhancing productivity and efficiency despite their pricing differences.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Snyk | 12.5% |
| FOSSA | 3.1% |
| Other | 84.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
