FOSSA vs JFrog Xray comparison

FOSSA and JFrog are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. FOSSA is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while JFrog is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0. FOSSA holds a 3.1% mindshare in SCA, compared to JFrog’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of FOSSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

FOSSA

Read 15 FOSSA reviews

1,548 Views
1,486 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

JFrog Xray

Read 10 JFrog Xray reviews

6,971 Views
3,416 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

FOSSA

JFrog Xray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

FOSSA and JFrog Xray compete in the software composition analysis space. FOSSA is often preferred for its cost-effectiveness and robust support, while JFrog Xray is notable for its comprehensive feature set, appealing to those prioritizing detailed functionality.

Features: FOSSA offers advantages in license compliance, vulnerability detection, and compatibility with CI/CD pipelines. It enhances visibility and security in managing open-source projects. JFrog Xray excels with in-depth binary analysis, artifact scanning, and seamless integration with JFrog Artifactory, ensuring broad coverage in security and compliance.

Room for Improvement: FOSSA could benefit from expanding its unclassified license handling to offer more comprehensive out-of-the-box legal policies. Additionally, integrating proprietary code analysis could enhance its offering. JFrog Xray's complexity might be lessened with streamlined user interfaces and simpler policy management to improve usability without losing functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FOSSA is known for its straightforward deployment and strong support services, aiding quick integration into diverse environments. While JFrog Xray provides extensive documentation and supportive assistance, its deployment can be more challenging due to its myriad of features.

Pricing and ROI: FOSSA generally presents lower initial costs and faster ROI for companies not needing in-depth analysis. Its competitive pricing is ideal for basic licensing and vulnerability management. Although JFrog Xray is more expensive, its comprehensive capabilities justify the investment for firms requiring detailed artifact analysis and security oversight.

To learn more, read our detailed FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FOSSA

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Xray

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (36th), Container Security (16th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of FOSSA is 3.1%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Xray is 10.2%, up from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JFrog Xray	10.2%
FOSSA	3.1%
Other	86.7%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Hanumanth Ramsetty

Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

Proactively mitigate deployment vulnerabilities with seamless dependency tracking

Before using FOSSA, we could only identify issues after deployment in the Cloud Run. Now, with FOSSA, we identify dependency issues or vulnerabilities during the CI phase itself. This proactive approach has eliminated the need to search the internet for solutions, as FOSSA provides updated recommendations automatically. This has made the process more efficient and mitigated risks before deployment.

Read full review

Anand Nanwana

DevOps Engineer at Syvora

Offers flexibility across clouds and easy credential management while interface improvements are needed

For JFrog Xray, the Artifactory and package repositories are valuable features. There are many benefits from JFrog Xray. For example, with other registries such as ECR, we can use the images only in the AWS cloud. With JFrog, we can use this registry from any cloud or work locally as well. JFrog can support multiple packages, such as NuGet package, pip, and other technologies. It can be used for Terraform as well. The credential management is very easy in JFrog. For instance, when using GitHub action as a CI/CD tool, I just need to create a token and set up JFrog CLI there and give access to the repository. With multiple repositories, I can generate a token for a specific repository, add that token in the GitHub secret, fetch from the CI/CD, run the command JFrog CLI, and authenticate through the token. Then we can push the images into JFrog.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ease and speed of integrating into build pipelines, like a Jenkins pipeline or something along those lines. The ease of a new development team coming on board and integrating FOSSA with a new project, or even an existing project, can be done so quickly that it's invaluable and it's easy to ask the developers to use a tool like this. Those developers greatly value the very quick feedback they get on any licensing or security vulnerability issues."

"The scalability is excellent."

"FOSSA suggests solutions for dependency mismatches."

"The support team has just been amazing, and it helps us to have a great support team from FOSSA. They are there to triage and answer all our questions which come up by using their product."

"Policies and identification of open-source licensing issues are the most valuable features. It reduces the time needed to identify open-source software licensing issues."

"I found FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine to be accurate and that it was tuned appropriately to the settings that we were looking for. The policy engine is pretty straightforward... I find it to be very straightforward to make small modifications to, but it's very rare that we have to make modifications to it. It's easy to use. It's a four-category system that handles most cases pretty well."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to identify all of the components in a build, and then surface the licenses that are associated with it, allowing us to make a decision as to whether or not we allow a team to use the components. That eliminates the risk that comes with running consumer software that contains open source components."

"I am impressed with the tool’s seamless integration and quick results."

More FOSSA pros

"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."

"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."

"Good reporting functionalities."

"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."

More JFrog Xray pros

Cons

"We have seen some inaccuracies or incompleteness with the distribution acknowledgments for an application, so there's certainly some room for improvement there. Another big feature that's missing that should be introduced is snippet matching, meaning, not just matching an entire component, but matching a snippet of code that had been for another project and put in different files that one of our developers may have created."

"I wish there was a way that you could have a more global rollout of it, instead of having to do it in each repository individually. It's possible, that's something that is offered now, or maybe if you were using the CI Jenkins, you'd be able to do that. But with Travis, there wasn't an easy way to do that. At least not that I could find. That was probably the biggest issue."

"The solution provides contextualized, actionable, intelligence that alerts us to compliance issues, but there is still a little bit of work to be done on it. One of the issues that I have raised with FOSSA is that when it identifies an issue that is an error, why is it in error? What detail can they give to me? They've improved, but that still needs some work. They could provide more information that helps me to identify the dependencies and then figure out where they originated from."

"For open-source management, FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine is easy to use, but the list of licenses is not as complete as we would like it to be. They should add more open-source licenses to the selection."

"On the legal and policy sides, there is some room for improvement. I know that our legal team has raised complaints about having to approve the same dependency multiple times, as opposed to having them it across the entire organization."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"On the dashboard, there should be an option to increase the column width so that we can see the complete name of the GitHub repository. Currently, on the dashboard, we see the list of projects, but to see the complete name, you have to hover your mouse over an item, which is annoying."

"FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually."

More FOSSA cons

"The out-of-the-box PostgreSQL provided is not stable, which is why we are considering enterprise support."

"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."

"X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL."

"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."

"The UI of JFrog Xray could be improved. There is a dialogue box in the Xray section that doesn't always work properly."

"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."

"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."

"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."

More JFrog Xray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's cost is a five out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free."

"FOSSA is a fairly priced product. It is not either cheaper or expensive. The pricing lies somewhere in the middle. The solution is worth the money that we are spending to use it."

"FOSSA is not cheap, but their offering is top-notch. It is very much a "you get what you pay for" scenario. Regardless of the price, I highly recommend FOSSA."

"Its price is reasonable as compared to the market. It is competitively priced in comparison to other similar solutions on the market. It is also quite affordable in terms of the value that it delivers as compared to its alternative of hiring a team."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FOSSA?

The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free. You have to pay for the features you need, which I think is fair. If you want to get value for free...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FOSSA?

FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually. Some other tools like Check Point or SonarQube provide exact lin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FOSSA?

I have worked with FOSSA primarily to manage the dependencies in our projects. For example, if I take a Spring Boot application, FOSSA helps in identifying mismatches or unsupported dependencies th...

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Xray?

JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Xray?

I would assess the integration of JFrog Xray with CI/CD tools as the weak point. You have two means to do that: one is using the API, or the other is using the command line from JFrog. That part is...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Xray?

For JFrog Xray product, you can use it for two main goals: compliance and security. You can use it to check if your licenses are compliant, and you can check if your dependencies you want to use ar...

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck SCA vs FOSSA

Compared 39% of the time

Snyk vs FOSSA

Compared 19% of the time

Mend.io vs FOSSA

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs FOSSA

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs FOSSA

Compared 5% of the time

More FOSSA Competitors

Trivy vs JFrog Xray

Compared 14% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs JFrog Xray

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

Mend.io vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

More JFrog Xray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA

September 2025

Download FOSSA product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Xray

September 2025

Download JFrog Xray product report

Also Known As

No data available

JFrog Security Essentials

Overview

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.

FOSSA

JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].

If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.

As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"

JFrog

Sample Customers

AppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, Confluent

google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

September 2025

Free Report: FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

Find out what your peers are saying about FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.