FOSSA vs JFrog Xray comparison

FOSSA and JFrog are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. FOSSA is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while JFrog is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.0. FOSSA holds a 3.1% mindshare in SCA, compared to JFrog’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of FOSSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

FOSSA

Read 15 FOSSA reviews

1,810 Views
1,756 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

JFrog Xray

Read 10 JFrog Xray reviews

7,795 Views
3,508 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

FOSSA

JFrog Xray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

FOSSA and JFrog Xray compete in the software composition analysis space. FOSSA is often preferred for its cost-effectiveness and robust support, while JFrog Xray is notable for its comprehensive feature set, appealing to those prioritizing detailed functionality.

Features: FOSSA offers advantages in license compliance, vulnerability detection, and compatibility with CI/CD pipelines. It enhances visibility and security in managing open-source projects. JFrog Xray excels with in-depth binary analysis, artifact scanning, and seamless integration with JFrog Artifactory, ensuring broad coverage in security and compliance.

Room for Improvement: FOSSA could benefit from expanding its unclassified license handling to offer more comprehensive out-of-the-box legal policies. Additionally, integrating proprietary code analysis could enhance its offering. JFrog Xray's complexity might be lessened with streamlined user interfaces and simpler policy management to improve usability without losing functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FOSSA is known for its straightforward deployment and strong support services, aiding quick integration into diverse environments. While JFrog Xray provides extensive documentation and supportive assistance, its deployment can be more challenging due to its myriad of features.

Pricing and ROI: FOSSA generally presents lower initial costs and faster ROI for companies not needing in-depth analysis. Its competitive pricing is ideal for basic licensing and vulnerability management. Although JFrog Xray is more expensive, its comprehensive capabilities justify the investment for firms requiring detailed artifact analysis and security oversight.

To learn more, read our detailed FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FOSSA

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Xray

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (39th), Container Security (14th), Software Supply Chain Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of FOSSA is 3.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Xray is 7.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JFrog Xray	7.5%
FOSSA	3.1%
Other	89.4%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2588340

Senior Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Dependency management enhanced with update suggestions but lacks precise vulnerability tracking

FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually. Some other tools like Check Point or SonarQube provide exact line numbers for bugs. Also, the process in FOSSA can be quite contradicting and not very straightforward for new users.

Read full review

Anand Nanwana

DevOps Engineer at Syvora

Offers flexibility across clouds and easy credential management while interface improvements are needed

For JFrog Xray, the Artifactory and package repositories are valuable features. There are many benefits from JFrog Xray. For example, with other registries such as ECR, we can use the images only in the AWS cloud. With JFrog, we can use this registry from any cloud or work locally as well. JFrog can support multiple packages, such as NuGet package, pip, and other technologies. It can be used for Terraform as well. The credential management is very easy in JFrog. For instance, when using GitHub action as a CI/CD tool, I just need to create a token and set up JFrog CLI there and give access to the repository. With multiple repositories, I can generate a token for a specific repository, add that token in the GitHub secret, fetch from the CI/CD, run the command JFrog CLI, and authenticate through the token. Then we can push the images into JFrog.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the things that I really like about FOSSA is that it allows you to go very granular. For example, if there's a package that's been flagged because it's subject to a license that may be conflicts with or raises a concern with one of the policies that I've set, then FOSSA enables you to go really granular into that package to see which aspects of the package are subject to which licenses. We can ultimately determine with our engineering teams if we really need this part of the package or not. If it's raising this flag, we can make really actionable decisions at a very micro level to enable the build to keep pushing forward."

"FOSSA is easy to use and set up, provides relatively accurate results, and doesn't require armies of people to get value from its use."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to identify all of the components in a build, and then surface the licenses that are associated with it, allowing us to make a decision as to whether or not we allow a team to use the components. That eliminates the risk that comes with running consumer software that contains open source components."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ease and speed of integrating into build pipelines, like a Jenkins pipeline or something along those lines. The ease of a new development team coming on board and integrating FOSSA with a new project, or even an existing project, can be done so quickly that it's invaluable and it's easy to ask the developers to use a tool like this. Those developers greatly value the very quick feedback they get on any licensing or security vulnerability issues."

"Their CLI tool is very efficient. It does not send your source code over to their servers. It just does fingerprinting. It is also very easy to integrate into software development practices."

"FOSSA provided us with contextualized, easily actionable intelligence that alerted us to compliance issues. I could tell FOSSA exactly what I cared about and they would tell me when something was out of policy. I don't want to hear from the compliance tool unless I have an issue that I need to deal with. That was what was great about FOSSA is that it was basically "Here's my policy and only send me an alert if there's something without a policy." I thought that it was really good at doing that."

"Being able to know the licenses of the libraries is most valuable because we sell products, and we need to provide to the customers the licenses that we are using."

"FOSSA allows us to keep track of all dependencies to ensure they are up to date and not causing any vulnerabilities."

More FOSSA pros

"Good reporting functionalities."

"I am utilizing the deep scanning capabilities in JFrog Xray product, and this feature is very handy because with other software, you don't know where the bad dependencies come from."

"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

"With JFrog, we can use this registry from any cloud or work locally as well, and it can support multiple packages such as NuGet, pip, and other technologies including Terraform, making credential management very easy."

"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."

More JFrog Xray pros

Cons

"FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually."

"One thing that can sometimes be difficult with FOSSA is understanding all that it can do. One of the ways that I've been able to unlock some of those more advanced features is through conversations with the absolutely awesome customer success team at FOSSA, but it has been a little bit difficult to find some of that information separately on my own through FAQs and other information channels that FOSSA has. The improvement is less about the product itself and more about empowering FOSSA customers to know and understand how to unlock its full potential."

"I wish there was a way that you could have a more global rollout of it, instead of having to do it in each repository individually. It's possible, that's something that is offered now, or maybe if you were using the CI Jenkins, you'd be able to do that. But with Travis, there wasn't an easy way to do that. At least not that I could find. That was probably the biggest issue."

"I would like the FOSSA API to be broader. I would like not to have to interact with the GUI at all, to do the work that I want to do. I would like them to do API-first development, rather than a focus on the GUI."

"While running a FOSSA scan, it takes time for the results to reflect in the FOSSA UI portal."

"If you have thousands of applications, organizing them all into teams or tags is challenging."

"On the dashboard, there should be an option to increase the column width so that we can see the complete name of the GitHub repository. Currently, on the dashboard, we see the list of projects, but to see the complete name, you have to hover your mouse over an item, which is annoying."

"For open-source management, FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine is easy to use, but the list of licenses is not as complete as we would like it to be. They should add more open-source licenses to the selection."

More FOSSA cons

"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."

"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."

"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."

"X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL."

"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."

"The UI of JFrog Xray could be improved. There is a dialogue box in the Xray section that doesn't always work properly."

"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."

"The out-of-the-box PostgreSQL provided is not stable, which is why we are considering enterprise support."

More JFrog Xray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable as compared to the market. It is competitively priced in comparison to other similar solutions on the market. It is also quite affordable in terms of the value that it delivers as compared to its alternative of hiring a team."

"FOSSA is not cheap, but their offering is top-notch. It is very much a "you get what you pay for" scenario. Regardless of the price, I highly recommend FOSSA."

"The solution's cost is a five out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free."

"FOSSA is a fairly priced product. It is not either cheaper or expensive. The pricing lies somewhere in the middle. The solution is worth the money that we are spending to use it."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FOSSA?

The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free. You have to pay for the features you need, which I think is fair. If you want to get value for free...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FOSSA?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FOSSA?

I have worked with FOSSA primarily to manage the dependencies in our projects. For example, if I take a Spring Boot application, FOSSA helps in identifying mismatches or unsupported dependencies th...

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Xray?

JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Xray?

I would assess the integration of JFrog Xray with CI/CD tools as the weak point. You have two means to do that: one is using the API, or the other is using the command line from JFrog. That part is...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Xray?

For JFrog Xray product, you can use it for two main goals: compliance and security. You can use it to check if your licenses are compliant, and you can check if your dependencies you want to use ar...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs FOSSA

Compared 23% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs FOSSA

Compared 22% of the time

Mend.io vs FOSSA

Compared 9% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs FOSSA

Compared 6% of the time

GitLab vs FOSSA

Compared 5% of the time

More FOSSA Competitors

Trivy vs JFrog Xray

Compared 11% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs JFrog Xray

Compared 9% of the time

Wiz vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs JFrog Xray

Compared 5% of the time

Mend.io vs JFrog Xray

Compared 5% of the time

More JFrog Xray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA

February 2026

Download FOSSA product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Xray

January 2026

Download JFrog Xray product report

Also Known As

No data available

JFrog Security Essentials

Overview

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.

FOSSA

JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].

If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.

As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"

JFrog

Sample Customers

AppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, Confluent

google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

December 2025

Free Report: FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray

Find out what your peers are saying about FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FOSSA vs. JFrog Xray report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.