Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025
HPE ProLiant DL Servers and IBM Power Systems compete in the server category. Based on the data comparisons, IBM Power Systems seem to have the upper hand in processing power and integrated virtualization features, excelling in high-load environments.
Features: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are known for their reliability, scalability, and remote management through iLO. They also support RAID configurations and offer a strong performance-cost ratio. On the other hand, IBM Power Systems boast exceptional processing power and reliability. They feature advanced virtualization capabilities, making them ideal for AIX and Linux applications, providing robustness and resilient performance.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProLiant DL Servers could enhance cost efficiency, improve iLO features, and streamline firmware updates. Users also desire simpler management tools. IBM Power Systems need better cloud integration, simplified licensing, and management interfaces. There's a call for reduced complexity in updates and enhanced documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both HPE ProLiant DL Servers and IBM Power Systems are typically deployed on-premises, with users generally satisfied with the deployment process. HPE users commend the responsiveness of support services, though it varies geographically. IBM users note the reliability of support but see room for improvement in documentation and response speed.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are seen as offering a good balance of cost and performance, yet users suggest enhancing licensing costs and pricing flexibility. IBM Power Systems are considered expensive but provide strong value in large-scale applications. Both systems promise solid long-term ROI through reliability and uptime, despite initial higher expenses.
To learn more, read our detailed
HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report (Updated: July 2025).
