Sep 26, 2017
Have never used Cisco servers. HP is my server preference since they bought out Compaq so long ago.
If you have ever called tech support for either company, you would definitely choose HP over Cisco.
HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers compete in the server industry, offering solutions for data centers requiring robust performance and management capabilities. HPE ProLiant DL Servers appear to have an upper hand due to their cost-effective performance and superior technical support, appealing to businesses prioritizing budget and support quality.
Features: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are known for reliability, scalability, and performance. Their powerful yet cost-effective nature, alongside valuable remote management capabilities offered by iLO, stand out. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers excel in integration capabilities and network management efficiency, backed by UCS Manager, providing robust server management and ease of operation.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProLiant DL Servers could improve on boot times, management software features, and competitive pricing. Better technical support and remote monitoring integration are needed. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers have improvement potential in scalability, flexibility with storage options, and integration with non-Cisco hardware. Improve remote management capabilities and AI features for smarter operations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both HPE and Cisco offer robust deployment options. HPE supports hybrid deployments and receives praise for responsive technical support, though some users face response delays. Cisco offers quick problem-solving support, with noted improvements needed in responsiveness. Both receive high marks for structured service schedules and dependable assistance.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are cost-effective, providing superior performance versus cost benefits, although some note the higher price. Licensing for iLO is separate but deemed worthwhile. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers are more expensive due to licensing and components but offer robust features and integration options. Despite higher initial costs, both provide good ROI, though Cisco's higher price may deter cost-sensitive customers.
UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.
HPE ProLiant DL Servers are utilized by organizations for tasks like virtualization, database hosting, and application hosting, deployed both on-premises and in private clouds for diverse needs.
Organizations depend on HPE ProLiant DL Servers for stability, performance, and reliability. They are essential for running active directories, enterprise applications, and handling high-performance computing. These servers are known for their easy setup, scalability, and extensive management capabilities like iLO. Offering compatibility with many components and energy efficiency, they provide reliable hardware and good performance under demanding conditions. However, there is a need for improved price, stability, scalability, airflow, and power consumption. Enhancements in controller cache, port sizes, SAN connectivity, support availability, and management interface are also required. Faster technical support, better documentation, simplified configurations, and enhanced monitoring features and security integration would benefit users.
What are the key features?HPE ProLiant DL Servers are implemented across industries like finance for active directories and payment solutions, education for virtual desktops, healthcare for database synchronization, and IT firms for high-performance computing and application hosting.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
