Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Billing Software (4th)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 22.6%, down from 26.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Maximo22.6%
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management2.7%
Other74.7%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Omar Samy - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved resource management and streamlined operations enhance organizational efficiency
IBM Maximo could be improved if they added a comprehensive finance module, as that would make it a more complete standalone application. Currently, if you need specific finance software, you need to purchase something such as SAP and integrate it with IBM Maximo. Coverage in this area would help reduce dependency on additional software. Regarding finance features, I would want to see payment capabilities added to IBM Maximo, particularly for factories making payments with providers and collections. This feature isn't adequately covered in IBM Maximo. Additionally, enhanced finance reporting and managing GL would be beneficial. IBM Maximo covers GL but only at a surface level. It doesn't provide deep account analysis.
RajneeshThamke - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported tracking asset lifecycles with cost and maintenance visibility
The best feature is the ability to track the entire lifecycle from when the asset enters your organization until disposal. The entire lifecycle can be captured, including costs, depreciation, and any maintenance performed on the asset. All these costs can be tracked, which is the beauty of it. The advanced analytics and reporting tools are highly advanced. Because of the advent of AI technology, integrating it with AI will probably add much more value to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"We were doing all kinds of paperwork for every type of order and to maintain our assets but with the use of the IBM Maximo application, we can automate a lot of the processes."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"We were able to scale perfectly.​"
"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
 

Cons

"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"You can get lost using the application"
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"The standard reports that shipped with the package need to be enriched with more advanced reports, especially for the Inventory Management sections."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?
IBM Maximo could be improved if they added a comprehensive finance module, as that would make it a more complete standalone application. Currently, if you need specific finance software, you need t...
What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?
My main use case for IBM Maximo is managing maintenance. I used it first as an end user, and later joined the implementation team. Now I'm administrating and implementing IBM Maximo. The transition...
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Maximo?
There are many good implemented functions in IBM Maximo, but I see these two functions as the most valuable ones from my point of view. My advice to others considering IBM Maximo is that top manage...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Maximo
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.