Kiuwan and Snyk compete in the code analysis and security vulnerability management category. Snyk seems to have the upper hand due to its simplicity, extensive integrations, and a comprehensive vulnerability database.
Features: Kiuwan is known for code quality management, detailed reporting, and integration with Jenkins, JIRA, and SDLC tools. It supports numerous languages and helps identify vulnerabilities, suitable for legacy systems. Users note its quick scanning speeds and comprehensive remediation steps. Snyk is praised for its developer-friendly approach, simplicity, and extensive integration options, including CI/CD systems. It delivers accurate vulnerability reports with minimal false positives and offers a self-service model with a vast vulnerability database.
Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could improve its report downloading process and support for additional languages. Integration with development environments like IntelliJ and NetBeans needs enhancement. Snyk requires better language support and a reduction in false positives. It could benefit from a streamlined reporting structure, improved integration with IDs, and enhancements in documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is commonly used in on-premises and hybrid cloud environments with some public cloud usage. Customer service has room for improvement, particularly in support accessibility. Snyk excels in public cloud deployments with robust cloud support options and well-regarded customer service, strong documentation, and responsive technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is cost-effective with pricing based on code lines scanned, regarded as more affordable than competitors, with users noting improvements in code quality and time-to-market. Snyk, while more expensive, offers a broad range of developer-focused features. Its complex pricing model is appreciated for extensive coverage and integration capabilities. Despite being pricey, users find its investment justified due to the features and comprehensive support provided.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Snyk | 5.6% |
| Kiuwan | 1.2% |
| Other | 93.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.
Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.
What are Snyk's standout features?Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
