Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kiuwan Logo

Top 10 Kiuwan Alternatives

Vendor: Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Kiuwan Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kiuwan based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube, Snyk, and GitLab. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kiuwan Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kiuwan, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools and provides detailed metrics for multiple languages. In comparison, Kiuwan offers efficient scanning and modular features, being praised for ease of use, making it suitable for quick integration into automated pipelines.
Download Kiuwan vs. SonarQube Report
SonarQube offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Kiuwan involves a more complex initial investment. The main difference lies in SonarQube's simplicity compared to Kiuwan's higher setup expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Kiuwan involves a more complex initial investment. The main difference lies in SonarQube's simplicity compared to Kiuwan's higher setup expenses.
Kiuwan Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan excels in integration capabilities and diverse language support, making it suitable for enterprises needing detailed insights. In comparison, Snyk focuses on simplicity and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and robust client service.
Download Kiuwan vs. Snyk Report
Kiuwan's setup cost is competitive, while Snyk offers flexible pricing options. Kiuwan emphasizes cost-effectiveness, contrasting with Snyk's adaptable plans catering to a broad range of needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan's setup cost is competitive, while Snyk offers flexible pricing options. Kiuwan emphasizes cost-effectiveness, contrasting with Snyk's adaptable plans catering to a broad range of needs.
Kiuwan Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan offers attractive pricing and easy deployment with robust code analysis and security features. In comparison, GitLab's higher cost delivers richer capabilities, including CI/CD integration and full DevOps lifecycle management, appealing to teams seeking comprehensive functionality despite more complex deployment.
Download GitLab vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.
Kiuwan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Checkmarx One offers extensive integrations and multi-language support. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in vulnerability insights and intuitive configuration, appealing to detailed security needs. Checkmarx One attracts with competitive pricing, while Kiuwan provides value through comprehensive insights despite higher costs.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Report
Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.
Kiuwan Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Veracode, known for robust analytics integration, appeals to those seeking seamless workflow integration. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts users desiring extensive rule customization. Veracode's intuitive deployment aids quick setup, while Kiuwan's cost-effectiveness offers detailed security insights, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers.
Download Kiuwan vs. Veracode Report
Veracode's setup cost is typically higher yet offers robust enterprise-level features, while Kiuwan presents a more budget-friendly option with costs that align well with small to medium-sized businesses, emphasizing flexibility and ease of initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode's setup cost is typically higher yet offers robust enterprise-level features, while Kiuwan presents a more budget-friendly option with costs that align well with small to medium-sized businesses, emphasizing flexibility and ease of initial implementation.
Kiuwan Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan is known for seamless integrations and security, appealing to businesses seeking speed and comprehensive reports. In comparison, Coverity Static attracts enterprises needing deep scanning and low false positives, though its complexity and cost may deter smaller businesses.
Download Coverity Static vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan offers a seamless setup with competitive costs, while Coverity Static requires higher upfront investment for installation. Kiuwan's affordability contrasts with Coverity Static's extensive setup expenses, catering to different financial preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a seamless setup with competitive costs, while Coverity Static requires higher upfront investment for installation. Kiuwan's affordability contrasts with Coverity Static's extensive setup expenses, catering to different financial preferences.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
OpenText Core Application Security
4.0 out of 5
OpenText offers quick compliance and seamless development cycle integration, attracting those needing thorough testing management. In comparison, Kiuwan enhances code quality with modular analysis and comprehensive insights, appealing to tech buyers seeking straightforward security assessments and support for diverse languages.
Download Kiuwan vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report
OpenText Core Application Security typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Kiuwan, making OpenText a more upfront investment choice, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly setup option appealing to those seeking immediate cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Core Application Security typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Kiuwan, making OpenText a more upfront investment choice, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly setup option appealing to those seeking immediate cost efficiency.
Kiuwan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan excels in pricing and customer support, appealing for its thorough code analysis and seamless integration efforts. In comparison, Mend.io's enhanced vulnerability detection and extensive tech support cater to those valuing a versatile solution, justifying its higher cost through robust features and solid ROI.
Download Kiuwan vs. Mend.io Report
Kiuwan has a more cost-effective setup cost compared to Mend.io, providing an attractive initial investment. On the other hand, Mend.io offers a higher setup cost, potentially indicating a more comprehensive upfront service or feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan has a more cost-effective setup cost compared to Mend.io, providing an attractive initial investment. On the other hand, Mend.io offers a higher setup cost, potentially indicating a more comprehensive upfront service or feature set.
Kiuwan Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
OWASP Zap appeals for its cost-effectiveness, plugin support, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts through its comprehensive features, offering in-depth analytics and continuous monitoring, although its complex setup is offset by responsive support. Buyer choice hinges on budget and feature priorities.
Download Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap Report
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup appealing to budget-conscious users, while Kiuwan presents a more premium setup cost reflecting its comprehensive solution.
View comparison
Pricing
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup appealing to budget-conscious users, while Kiuwan presents a more premium setup cost reflecting its comprehensive solution.
Kiuwan Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Acunetix offers compelling pricing and customer support, with notable scanning capabilities. In comparison, Kiuwan appeals to developers through a wide range of code analysis and integration features, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations prioritizing feature-rich investment over cost efficiency.
Download Acunetix vs. Kiuwan Report
Acunetix has a higher setup cost, offering robust security features, while Kiuwan presents a more affordable setup, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix has a higher setup cost, offering robust security features, while Kiuwan presents a more affordable setup, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.
Kiuwan Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan is ideal for those prioritizing affordability and easy integration. In comparison, Sonatype Lifecycle impresses with its extensive automation and risk analysis capabilities. Kiuwan favors a straightforward deployment, while Sonatype justifies its higher cost with significant long-term ROI benefits.
Download Kiuwan vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Sonatype Lifecycle involves a more complex and potentially higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Sonatype Lifecycle involves a more complex and potentially higher setup expense.
Kiuwan Logo
HCL AppScan
3.8 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
HCL AppScan
3.8 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in comprehensive vulnerability detection with flexible deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers efficient integration and affordability, making it ideal for diverse programming environments. HCL may suit organizations prioritizing support, while Kiuwan appeals with cost-effective integration capabilities.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.8 out of 5
Qualys Web Application Scanning is noted for its efficient deployment, favorable pricing, and strong support, making it ideal for vulnerability management and seamless integration needs. In comparison, Kiuwan appeals with a comprehensive feature set for those prioritizing extensive code analysis and security compliance.
Download Kiuwan vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs a setup cost that can be higher, focusing on comprehensive security features, while Kiuwan presents a comparatively lower setup expense, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs a setup cost that can be higher, focusing on comprehensive security features, while Kiuwan presents a comparatively lower setup expense, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate initial investment.
Kiuwan Logo
Klocwork
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Klocwork
4.0 out of 5
Klocwork offers reliable support and clear pricing for efficient code analysis. In comparison, Kiuwan provides a comprehensive feature set with robust integration capabilities. Tech buyers may choose Klocwork for ease of deployment or opt for Kiuwan's broader functionality despite its complexity.
Download Kiuwan vs. Klocwork Report
Klocwork's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive features, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly option with a lower initial setup cost, highlighting its potential appeal for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Klocwork's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive features, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly option with a lower initial setup cost, highlighting its potential appeal for organizations with limited budgets.
Kiuwan Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
GitHub offers robust code management, ideal for open-source projects with its integration capabilities. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in code quality and security analysis. Tech buyers may choose GitHub for collaboration ease, while Kiuwan attracts those prioritizing security and detailed reporting.
Download GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report
GitHub's setup cost is considered minimal by most users, while Kiuwan has a more complex setup reported by its users, highlighting a key difference in initial deployment experience.
View comparison
Pricing
GitHub's setup cost is considered minimal by most users, while Kiuwan has a more complex setup reported by its users, highlighting a key difference in initial deployment experience.
Kiuwan Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Invicti attracts budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and efficient customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers advanced integration capabilities and extensive scanning features, appealing to those prioritizing long-term value through comprehensive security tools despite higher initial costs.
Download Invicti vs. Kiuwan Report
Invicti has a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan requires a higher initial investment. This pricing distinction highlights Invicti as a more budget-friendly option compared to Kiuwan.
View comparison
Pricing
Invicti has a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan requires a higher initial investment. This pricing distinction highlights Invicti as a more budget-friendly option compared to Kiuwan.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Contrast Security Assess
4.4 out of 5
Kiuwan appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, catering to diverse environments. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess delivers advanced real-time monitoring and dynamic assessments. Kiuwan's efficiency suits budget-conscious teams, while Contrast's richer features justify higher costs for those seeking comprehensive security insights.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Fortify Application Defender
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan impresses with integration capabilities and insightful analytics, favoring users seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Fortify Application Defender provides real-time protection and comprehensive security, appealing to those prioritizing depth and immediate threat response. Kiuwan offers ease of deployment, while Fortify demands a higher learning curve.
Download Fortify Application Defender vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan offers lower setup costs making it a more budget-friendly option, while Fortify Application Defender presents higher initial expenses but offers robust features for comprehensive security.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers lower setup costs making it a more budget-friendly option, while Fortify Application Defender presents higher initial expenses but offers robust features for comprehensive security.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Digital.ai Application Security
3.0 out of 5

Our proprietary protection capabilities shield apps from reverse engineering, tampering, API exploits, and other attacks that can put your business, your customers, and your bottom line at risk.

View comparison
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Fortra's Digital Defense Frontline WAS
1 out of 5

Fortra's Digital Defense Frontline Web Application Scanner (WAS) is an easy-to-use security solution that provides prioritized vulnerability reporting and technical recommendations so your remediation team can tackle the biggest threats, first. Frontline WAS easily runs dynamic web application tests with accurate results, not matter how much your web apps change.

View comparison

Related categories

Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Development Analytics