GitLab vs Kiuwan comparison

GitLab and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Kiuwan is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.8. GitLab holds a 2.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 86 GitLab reviews

18,203 Views
2,730 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,522 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitLab

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and GitLab compete in the software market. Kiuwan excels in pricing and customer support, making it a preferred choice for value seekers. GitLab attracts users with its wide range of features, providing long-term benefits.

Features: Kiuwan offers robust code analysis, extensive security checks, and improved software quality. GitLab provides a comprehensive suite of DevOps tools, seamless integration into development pipelines, and versatility for large-scale projects.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Kiuwan could enhance its integration options, improve reporting functionalities, and adapt to modern demands. GitLab users indicate occasional performance lags, the need for simpler configurations, and optimization challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is known for easy deployment and responsive customer service. GitLab, although initially complex, offers comprehensive online resources to aid in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan's pricing is straightforward and cost-effective, promising quick ROI. GitLab has higher initial costs but delivers satisfactory ROI through its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Kiuwan

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.4%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.4%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	96.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

"The stability of GitLab is impressive."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."

"By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects."

"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

More GitLab pros

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."

"While GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features. Roadmaps and Gantt charts in GitLab are not as advanced as in Jira, and changing start and end dates is more laborious in GitLab."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better."

"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."

"In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents."

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

More GitLab cons

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"We are using the open-source version."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Check with your account manager."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient. Security-wise, we have security features enabled in GitLab fo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 38% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 12% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 46% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

September 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

September 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Kiuwan

September 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.