GitLab vs Tekton comparison

In the CI/CD tools category, GitLab and Tekton are two prominent competitors. GitLab has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features offering both repository and deployment functionalities.

Features: GitLab provides robust CI/CD pipeline management, security features, and integration with various platforms, combining repository and deployment capabilities. Tekton stands out for its cloud-native architecture, customizable and scalable pipelines, and seamless Kubernetes environment operation.

Room for Improvement: GitLab faces challenges with AWS and third-party integrations, better metrics for non-developers, and cost concerns for smaller teams. Tekton needs better documentation, increased flexibility in YAML configurations, and scalability improvement; its dashboard also lacks detailed information.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab supports a wide array of deployment environments, with mixed reviews on customer service. Tekton focuses on hybrid and Kubernetes-based environments, with an emphasis on community support due to its open-source nature.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab offers free and paid versions, with high costs for smaller teams but good ROI in terms of features. Tekton is free of charge, providing cost-effectiveness and lower resource requirements, with ROI noted in operational cost reduction compared to licensed counterparts.