CircleCI vs Tekton comparison

CircleCI and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CircleCI is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.7, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. CircleCI holds a 3.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of CircleCI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

CircleCI

Read 9 CircleCI reviews

1,158 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

3,484 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

CircleCI and Tekton are competing products in the continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) space. CircleCI has an advantage in ease of setup and customer support, whereas Tekton offers better customization and integration possibilities, appealing to users requiring flexibility and specific tooling support.

Features: CircleCI is noted for integration with third-party services, flexible scalability, and a library of pre-built integrations. It makes the CI/CD process simpler and is often favored for small to medium projects. Tekton takes a Kubernetes-native approach with strong integration support for cloud-native applications. Its customizable pipeline structures and flexibility meet enterprise-level needs well.

Room for Improvement: CircleCI could enhance its configuration options to better cater to enterprise environments and improve customization capabilities. Extending the user interface and further simplifying complex workflows would benefit its users. Tekton may improve on its technical setup requirements by reducing the complexity for newcomers. Enhanced documentation and clearer troubleshooting guidance can assist users in navigating its robust features more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CircleCI offers a user-friendly setup process and comprehensive support, including clear documentation and direct support channels. It's an attractive option for organizations needing a quick deployment. Tekton, part of the Kubernetes ecosystem, demands more technical knowledge but is backed by a strong community, attracting those who value open-source ecosystems and community collaboration.

Pricing and ROI: CircleCI provides a tiered pricing model, making it cost-effective for startups and smaller teams, facilitating quick ROI through rapid deployment. However, Tekton, as an open-source tool, incurs costs related to setup and maintenance of infrastructure but offers potential long-term ROI due to its customization for specific business needs. This may prove a sound investment for organizations able to unlock its full capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CircleCI vs. Tekton Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. Tekton

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (203rd)

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 7.0%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tekton	7.0%
CircleCI	3.5%
Other	89.5%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

RahulArora

Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automated CI/CD pipelines have transformed deployment speed and collaboration for my teams

CircleCI offers fast parallel builds, easy integration with GitHub, and the ability to deploy applications on Kubernetes pods, which are amazing features. Fast parallel builds and GitHub integration have definitely helped my team reach faster time to market for our applications. Previously, our deployment used to take a couple of hours when doing it manually, but with CircleCI pipeline, our hours-long job has been converted to a couple of minutes. Its simplicity, fast pipeline execution, and strong GitHub and GitLab integrations are definitely unique advantages I discovered while using CircleCI. Time saved is one of the key aspects I have seen since using CircleCI. I have noticed fewer deployment errors, and it has helped me with easy debugging. Time saved is directly proportional to the cost and effort saved. CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by integrating directly with my Git repositories as a fully managed SaaS platform. CircleCI has a great impact on my team's collaboration and communication, with around 25 to 40 developers and DevOps engineers using it daily across multiple repositories and environments, helping us use it at scale. CircleCI has significantly increased our release frequency and deployment speed compared to before I started using it. CircleCI improves security for my organization by enforcing automated checks in the pipeline and securely managing secrets through environment variables while providing auditable deployments. CircleCI integrates seamlessly with my DevOps toolchain by connecting directly to GitHub, container registries, and my cloud platform AWS, allowing the entire CI/CD flow from code commit to deployment and monitoring with minimal manual effort.

Read full review

reviewer2741265

Software engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Benefit from a smooth learning curve and efficient adaptability

After seeing Jenkins and Tekton, I think Tekton is quite built on top of Kubernetes, so the learning curve is minimal. If you are working with Kubernetes, then OpenShift created Tekton on top of that, making it easily adaptable. Tekton is highly customizable. With Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders. If teams have time and want to make enhancements, they can do it themselves. Whatever OpenShift is providing regarding Tekton is sufficient. It is easy to use because we don't need to write every pod step every time. A proper DevOps engineer can help once or twice, and development teams can easily adapt to that, make small shell script changes in the steps, understand the process, and work with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by bringing in faster deployments, which means we can release faster, receive quicker feedback, and enhance collaboration and communication across the entire team."

"It's a stable product."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to build quicker and do things quicker."

"CircleCI has significantly reduced build and deployment times, saving substantial engineering hours and effort for me, which has directly improved my productivity and release velocity, reflecting incredible ROI."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."

More CircleCI pros

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"The tool offers flexibility and compatibility."

"It scales automatically based on the number of tasks or pipelines running, which is efficient and effective for our development needs."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"Tekton is serverless and runs on OpenShift, and we leverage Tekton to take full advantage of the Kubernetes features such as running and scaling the solution in PaaS."

"The ability to scale is valuable."

"Tekton is customizable because with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"Billing is a mess."

"I believe debugging complex pipelines and managing credits can sometimes be challenging, especially for large workflows, so these areas can be improved."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"I rated CircleCI six out of ten because I think they need more transparency in pricing, as there are instances of unclear network data transfer and storage costs related to caching and workspaces."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"A return on investment with CircleCI has not been observed, and no relevant metrics such as time saved or fewer employees needed can be shared."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"The product's scalability can be challenging when multiple users access it simultaneously."

"Compared to traditional tools like Jenkins, Tekton lacks a lot of features. It's not efficient in managing conflicts between multiple pipelines."

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"When we started with Tekton around 2021 or early 2022, the community support was somewhat limited, which posed challenges when dealing with issues or debugging. We had to rely on Red Hat OpenShift support to overcome these challenges. However, I believe that these issues will naturally improve over timeas the developer community grows stronger. From a technical perspective, I haven't had the opportunity to deeply evaluate the product end-to-end, especially in the past year or so, when I've been less involved with it."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

"The solution is open-source."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free of cost."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

There is not much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that is managed by the legal team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

CircleCI's Orbs are not as easy to use as they could be. If CircleCI implemented a function approach similar to GitHub Actions, it would be significantly better. CircleCI could be improved if it co...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?

For others looking into using CircleCI, study thoroughly about CircleCI's Orbs because they are quite complicated. The overall review rating for CircleCI is 6 out of 10.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tekton?

We use Tekton for build and deployments. For LMP testing, we use the Tekton pipeline. We also use GitHub CI/CD. For infrastructure pipelines and Infrastructure as Code (IaC), we use Tekton. Previou...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs CircleCI

Compared 7% of the time

Jenkins vs CircleCI

Compared 6% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI

February 2026

Download CircleCI product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

January 2026

Download Tekton product report

Overview

CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates software development, streamlining the process for engineers and developers. It's valued for its ability to enhance development speed while maintaining high software quality.

Known for its robust CI/CD capabilities, CircleCI supports a wide range of programming languages and integrations, allowing teams to build and deploy code with efficiency and reliability. Its flexibility and automation features help teams quickly adapt to changing project requirements. CircleCI's cloud-based architecture ensures scalability and accessibility, making it an attractive option for modern development environments.

What are CircleCI's key features?

Continuous Integration: Automates code integration with testing to catch errors early.
Continuous Deployment: Simplifies the process of deploying code to production environments.
Customizable Workflows: Offers flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages.
Parallel Execution: Speeds up builds by running multiple tasks at once.
VCS Integration: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.

What benefits can users expect when using CircleCI?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines development workflows, reducing the time to market.
Improved Code Quality: Early error detection through automation increases overall quality.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing workloads as development needs evolve.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared visibility and control over development processes.

In tech-driven industries, CircleCI enables efficient software development pipelines. Its ability to run automated tests and manage deployments effectively is particularly beneficial in fast-paced, innovation-driven fields like fintech, mobile app development, and SaaS platforms. Offering tools that meet high-demand environments, it supports teams in delivering timely and quality software products.

CircleCI

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. Tekton

February 2026

Free Report: CircleCI vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about CircleCI vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CircleCI vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.