Harness vs Tekton comparison

Harness and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Harness is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Harness holds a 7.8% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Harness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

Harness

Read 4 Harness reviews

2,431 Views
2,091 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

4,059 Views
4,059 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Harness

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Harness and Tekton compete in the CI/CD platform market. Harness often gains the upper hand due to its ease of use and robust features, while Tekton appeals to teams needing high customization.

Features: Harness provides automated Canary and Blue-Green deployments, intuitive cloud cost management, and straightforward UI for simplified workflows. Tekton offers pipeline modularity and integrates seamlessly with existing DevOps tools, emphasizing flexibility and adaptability. Harness is user-friendly, whereas Tekton serves teams craving customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harness offers a fast deployment model with extensive customer support, making it suitable for teams with limited technical resources. Tekton requires a technical setup but fosters a community-driven approach, benefiting teams with internal expertise and innovation. Harness's strong customer service and detailed guides provide an advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Harness involves a higher setup cost, offering clear ROI through reduced deployment time and minimized risks. Tekton, being open-source, presents a low initial cost but demands investment in development resources for complex pipelines. Harness focuses on managed efficiency, while Tekton's affordability comes with increased in-house management requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Harness vs. Tekton Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Tekton

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (27th), Cloud Cost Management (12th)

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Harness is 7.8%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 11.5%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

Prasad Gupta

Software Engineer at IBM Software Labs

Efficient CI/CD management with significant cost reduction and a user-friendly setup

One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"The most valuable features of Tekton include the reusability of tasks, the clean UI interface, and the binding of services and secrets."

"The feature that I like most about Tekton is that it is built for Kubernetes, so we can utilize our resources effectively."

"The tool offers flexibility and compatibility."

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"Tekton provides a feature where you can schedule the job."

"It enables enterprises to build a flexible framework atop Tekton, making it easier to define workflows with standard inputs and outputs."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"I'm a bit worried about scaling Tekton from the point of view of big CI/CD processes."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"When we started with Tekton around 2021 or early 2022, the community support was somewhat limited, which posed challenges when dealing with issues or debugging. We had to rely on Red Hat OpenShift support to overcome these challenges. However, I believe that these issues will naturally improve over timeas the developer community grows stronger. From a technical perspective, I haven't had the opportunity to deeply evaluate the product end-to-end, especially in the past year or so, when I've been less involved with it."

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

"It would be better if Tekton could show the YAML file while it is running, similar to GitHub pipelines, to provide more visibility on what's happening."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is open-source."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

Our primary use case for Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) is as a deployment tool. Although I am not a DevOps engineer, my team uses Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) for deployment purpos...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs Harness

Compared 6% of the time

More Harness Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 31% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

July 2025

Download Harness product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

July 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

Armory

No data available

Overview

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Tekton

July 2025

Free Report: Harness vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about Harness vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Harness vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.