GitHub Actions vs Tekton comparison

GitHub and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. GitHub holds a 8.1% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

GitHub Actions

Read 23 GitHub Actions reviews

3,083 Views
3,083 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

3,484 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Tekton and GitHub Actions are players in the CI/CD tools category. In this competitive space, GitHub Actions seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration within GitHub and user-friendly community-driven ecosystem.

Features: Tekton is deeply integrated with Kubernetes, making it a strong choice for users in cloud-native environments. It offers scalability, customization, and efficient pipeline management while being cost-effective compared to tools like Jenkins. GitHub Actions provides automation solutions within GitHub, utilizing a community-driven ecosystem for ease of use and seamless interaction with GitHub repositories, allowing automation of tasks without added configuration.

Room for Improvement: Tekton requires advanced Kubernetes expertise and lacks comprehensive documentation, making it challenging for new users and missing some integration features compared to Jenkins. GitHub Actions, though user-friendly, could improve debugging, extend integration support across more third-party tools, and enhance pipeline and log management capabilities to enrich user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton is well-suited for Red Hat OpenShift environments with Red Hat support, especially for on-premises requirements, though community support can be inconsistent. GitHub Actions is ideal for public cloud deployments with robust GitHub integration, while community support varies in response time, given its open-source nature.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is open-source, offering savings particularly against Jenkins, with potential high costs through resource duplication across clusters. GitHub Actions offers low-cost options, with free tiers accessible to most users, while enterprise-level features incur reasonable additional costs, providing valuable ROI through scalable and efficient operations.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Actions vs. Tekton Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitHub Actions is 8.1%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 7.0%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tekton	7.0%
GitHub Actions	8.1%
Other	84.9%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Has supported repository management and demonstrates potential in workflow flexibility

While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps. Given the evolving nature of technology, there are potential improvements GitHub Actions can focus on, including enhancing support and reliability to match its competitors.

Read full review

reviewer2741265

Software engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Benefit from a smooth learning curve and efficient adaptability

After seeing Jenkins and Tekton, I think Tekton is quite built on top of Kubernetes, so the learning curve is minimal. If you are working with Kubernetes, then OpenShift created Tekton on top of that, making it easily adaptable. Tekton is highly customizable. With Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders. If teams have time and want to make enhancements, they can do it themselves. Whatever OpenShift is providing regarding Tekton is sufficient. It is easy to use because we don't need to write every pod step every time. A proper DevOps engineer can help once or twice, and development teams can easily adapt to that, make small shell script changes in the steps, understand the process, and work with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The level of automation achievable is really good. So, the custom workflow creation and Marketplace Actions improved our project's efficiency."

"Creating workflows in YAML format is straightforward and easy to comprehend. This includes both understanding and writing workflows. Additionally, the downloading aspect for third-party instances can also be easily done. It's worth noting that vulnerability analysis and similar tasks should be part of our automation through data workflows. Furthermore, we can break down our processes step by step, starting from building, then moving on to analysis, testing, and finally deploying in production and the clear environment. All of these tasks can be efficiently managed within this platform."

"GitHub Actions is a beautiful tool that integrates smoothly with all major tools, reducing CI/CD work by 30% to 40%."

"I am familiar with the entire life cycle of the product."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"GitHub Actions can be easily configured, especially for environment variables and secrets. The UI is understandable and user-friendly for setting up CI/CD pipelines. I prefer tools like GitLab, where the pipeline starts quickly and is accessible near the commits for easy access. However, many CI/CD tools are interchangeable due to similar features of GitHub Actions and other similar tools."

"The main benefit is collaboration. It allows us to easily collaborate with other developers, regardless of location. For example, we can collaborate with both our African and German colleagues seamlessly. It's platform-agnostic, so it is flexible and not tied to any OS, so we can work on Linux, Windows, web, and even Oracle applications. It's flexible, reliable, and overall an excellent tool for our needs."

"GitHub Actions helps automate the deployment process, eliminating manual copying and testing, which saves time and minimizes errors."

More GitHub Actions pros

"I find it beneficial to show data from Tekton to another GitHub or Bitbucket pipeline."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"One of the best things I appreciate is that Tekton runs on the Kubernetes platform. This is very useful when working on a project with other team members. For instance, suppose we have a very big project that requires building a large amount of source code or running many unit tests. During the build and unit test phases, Tekton on Kubernetes allows us to have a scalable machine to handle these tasks. This scalability is the most useful aspect for me."

"It scales automatically based on the number of tasks or pipelines running, which is efficient and effective for our development needs."

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"The platform's most valuable feature is its wireless capability, which makes installation easy and sets up the flow."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"My company would want to see some AI features in the tool as it can add value to the product."

"There is a part that detects outdated libraries. If that feature could be more intuitive and informative, that would be nice."

"The UI could be better."

"In our company, procedures or rules need to be completed, which is not a problem with GitHub Actions but with our process."

"Improvements could be made in terms of time-saving capabilities and resolving potential complexities in centralized workflows."

"The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

More GitHub Actions cons

"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."

"Tekton lacks integration capabilities compared to other CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"Tekton lacks sufficient documentation"

"Incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"Improvement is needed in the documentation and the overall integration process."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The solution is open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tekton?

We use Tekton for build and deployments. For LMP testing, we use the Tekton pipeline. We also use GitHub CI/CD. For infrastructure pipelines and Infrastructure as Code (IaC), we use Tekton. Previou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 7% of the time

Bitrise vs GitHub Actions

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Travis CI vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

January 2026

Download GitHub Actions product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

January 2026

Download Tekton product report

Overview

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

February 2026

Free Report: GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Actions vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Actions vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.