GitHub Actions vs Tekton comparison

GitHub and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 11.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

GitHub Actions

Read 22 GitHub Actions reviews

2,804 Views
2,804 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

4,059 Views
4,059 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and GitHub Actions compete in the CI/CD tools category. Tekton, with its Kubernetes-centric design and high customizability, holds the upper hand for users needing deep integration with Kubernetes environments. In contrast, GitHub Actions excels in ease of use and integration within GitHub, making it more approachable for quick CI/CD deployments.

Features: Tekton provides seamless Kubernetes integration, high customizability, and scalability to fit containerized environments. GitHub Actions offers strong GitHub integration, automation features, and user-friendly setups with minimal configuration.

Room for Improvement: Tekton could enhance its user documentation, simplify YAML configurations, and improve tool integrations. GitHub Actions would benefit from better logging, expanded integration options, and improved debugging support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton is versatile across various environments with robust support from Red Hat for OpenShift, though community support is mixed. GitHub Actions, primarily used in public cloud settings, offers straightforward deployment through GitHub and relies on community support for assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton, as an open-source tool on OpenShift, offers significant cost savings and operational efficiency. GitHub Actions is also free for individual users, with enterprise use potentially incurring costs. Both tools have cost-effective open-source structures and demonstrate value in reducing operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Actions vs. Tekton Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitHub Actions is 11.4%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 11.5%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Integration with various environments and cloud providers enhances automation

I use GitHub Actions for CI/CD pipelines. I automate infrastructure, deployment, and all processes. Most companies use CI/CD pipelines, and GitHub Actions is one of the tools available for this purpose The most valuable feature of GitHub Actions is that it is completely free. It can be integrated…

Read full review

Prasad Gupta

Software Engineer at IBM Software Labs

Efficient CI/CD management with significant cost reduction and a user-friendly setup

One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"The main benefit is collaboration. It allows us to easily collaborate with other developers, regardless of location. For example, we can collaborate with both our African and German colleagues seamlessly. It's platform-agnostic, so it is flexible and not tied to any OS, so we can work on Linux, Windows, web, and even Oracle applications. It's flexible, reliable, and overall an excellent tool for our needs."

"GitHub Actions is valuable for its ease of use and integration."

"It improves efficiency as it involves no downtime and is managed by GitHub."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"The solution has saved us approximately 20% in terms of efficiency and productivity."

"It is a very stable solution as we have not faced any issues."

More GitHub Actions pros

"Tekton has a user interface that facilitates time savings, making it more user-friendly than Jenkins."

"Tekton allows you to categorize tasks according to your needs and minimizes the amount of code needed."

"It enables enterprises to build a flexible framework atop Tekton, making it easier to define workflows with standard inputs and outputs."

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"I like the setup of the dashboard."

"The most valuable features of Tekton include the reusability of tasks, the clean UI interface, and the binding of services and secrets."

"Tekton is customizable because with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own."

"The 'promote' feature is beneficial as it simplifies deployment processes by allowing easy promotion of applications to different environments without needing to re-run CI/CD processes."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"GitHub sometimes makes it difficult to debug actions."

"The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"The UI could be better."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"The only issue I have faced is with authorization, particularly when configuring the GitHub token correctly."

"In terms of improvements, I think better logging for debugging purposes would be helpful, especially for complex workflows."

More GitHub Actions cons

"I'm a bit worried about scaling Tekton from the point of view of big CI/CD processes."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"Improvements could include introducing a UI-based pipeline development feature, such as drag and drop, which would help individuals with limited technical knowledge start building pipelines."

"Compared to traditional tools like Jenkins, Tekton lacks a lot of features. It's not efficient in managing conflicts between multiple pipelines."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"Tekton lacks integration capabilities compared to other CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free of cost."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

Frankly, I cannot imagine something that could be improved in GitHub Actions; there's a lot of capabilities, and the feature set is more advanced than we use. The pricing is high for the advanced s...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 14% of the time

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 12% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 9% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Actions

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

August 2025

Download GitHub Actions product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

July 2025

Download Tekton product report

Overview

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Actions vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Actions vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.