Tekton vs Travis CI comparison

Google and Travis CI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9, while Travis CI is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.0. Google holds a 7.0% mindshare in BA, compared to Travis CI’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution.

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

3,484 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Travis CI

Read 2 Travis CI reviews

544 Views
533 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Tekton

Travis CI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Travis CI and Tekton compete in the continuous integration and delivery category. Tekton appears to have an edge due to its cloud-native architecture, making it highly suitable for Kubernetes environments.

Features: Travis CI provides simplicity and robust language support, benefiting from seamless GitHub integration and easy YAML-based configuration. Tekton offers flexibility in custom pipeline creation and Kubernetes-native operations, making it ideal for cloud-native development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Travis CI is straightforward to deploy, providing a traditional experience with extensive online support resources. Tekton requires Kubernetes knowledge for deployment but aligns well with cloud-native practices, supported by comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Travis CI has straightforward pricing plans catering to different needs, appealing for simple CI/CD requirements. Tekton is open-source, eliminating license costs and offering scalability, leading to long-term ROI for cloud-native efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Travis CI

Ranking in Build Automation

20th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Tekton is 7.0%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Travis CI is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tekton	7.0%
Travis CI	2.2%
Other	90.8%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer2741265

Software engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Benefit from a smooth learning curve and efficient adaptability

After seeing Jenkins and Tekton, I think Tekton is quite built on top of Kubernetes, so the learning curve is minimal. If you are working with Kubernetes, then OpenShift created Tekton on top of that, making it easily adaptable. Tekton is highly customizable. With Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders. If teams have time and want to make enhancements, they can do it themselves. Whatever OpenShift is providing regarding Tekton is sufficient. It is easy to use because we don't need to write every pod step every time. A proper DevOps engineer can help once or twice, and development teams can easily adapt to that, make small shell script changes in the steps, understand the process, and work with it.

Read full review

Pravar Agrawal

Senior SRE at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

YAML-based configuration and simple deployment but user interface needs modernizing

Travis CI is an okay tool, and I am forced to use it as part of my job. I don't maintain it; it is running somewhere else, and I don't have control over it. The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010. It is very basic and designed for lightweight CI work, and it cannot handle heavy CI. You cannot do branched flows, and you will have to write shell scripts to send calls here and there. The pipelines are not as detailed as some other CI/CD tools. If Travis is down, you don't have any control over it and need to reach out to their customer support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"Tekton is serverless and runs on OpenShift, and we leverage Tekton to take full advantage of the Kubernetes features such as running and scaling the solution in PaaS."

"It enables enterprises to build a flexible framework atop Tekton, making it easier to define workflows with standard inputs and outputs."

"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."

"Tekton is customizable because with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own."

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"We just have some configuration files, and it will handle the deployments smoother and faster compared to CI/CD 2.0."

More Tekton pros

"The only thing I like about Travis CI is that you have a YAML file to define a Travis flow."

Cons

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"Improvements could include introducing a UI-based pipeline development feature, such as drag and drop, which would help individuals with limited technical knowledge start building pipelines."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"Improvement is needed in the build step."

"Compared to traditional tools like Jenkins, Tekton lacks a lot of features. It's not efficient in managing conflicts between multiple pipelines."

More Tekton cons

"The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The solution is open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tekton?

We use Tekton for build and deployments. For LMP testing, we use the Tekton pipeline. We also use GitHub CI/CD. For infrastructure pipelines and Infrastructure as Code (IaC), we use Tekton. Previou...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Travis CI?

I'm not too sure about the pricing of Travis or how the agreement works.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Travis CI?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Travis CI?

Travis CI is mainly used to run integration tests as part of the deployment, which I do on Kubernetes. The Travis workflows are integrated with any changes in my code. It will have different jobs, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Jenkins vs Travis CI

Compared 12% of the time

Wercker vs Travis CI

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs Travis CI

Compared 8% of the time

Harness vs Travis CI

Compared 8% of the time

TeamCity vs Travis CI

Compared 7% of the time

More Travis CI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

January 2026

Download Tekton product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

January 2026

Download Travis CI product report

Overview

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.

Travis CI

Sample Customers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.