Bamboo vs GitHub Actions comparison

Atlassian and GitHub are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Atlassian is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.4, while GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Atlassian holds a 7.1% mindshare in BA, compared to GitHub’s 11.4% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Bamboo

Read 22 Bamboo reviews

2,291 Views
2,288 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Read 21 GitHub Actions reviews

2,461 Views
2,124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bamboo

GitHub Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and GitHub Actions are both tools used in continuous integration and deployment, with unique strengths catering to different needs. GitHub Actions has a slight edge due to its user-friendly automation and integration capabilities within GitHub, compared to Bamboo's intricate integration with Atlassian products.

Features: Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian products like Jira, flexibility in setting up complex pipelines, and multi-environment deployment capabilities. Salesforce and Oracle integrations add value to its ecosystem. GitHub Actions provides easy automation with GitHub, efficient scalability, and support for versatile workflow creation, enhancing project efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Bamboo could improve ease of use, plugin support, and UI complexity. It also lacks Docker support and better version control in plans. Enhancements in integration and user training would boost its utility. GitHub Actions needs better artifact management, improved logging, expanded language support, and enhanced integration processes to improve user experience further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo is primarily on-premises or hybrid cloud-based, offering less flexibility compared to GitHub Actions, which excels in public cloud deployment, ensuring easy scalability. Bamboo receives positive feedback for customer service but occasionally faces delays. GitHub Actions benefits from strong community support, although its server-less nature presents different technical support challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's cost is affected by the use of agents, leading to higher expenses for large setups, with subscription models and hardware costs adding up. GitHub Actions, being mostly free or low-cost, is advantageous for small-scale or open-source projects, despite additional fees for enterprise-level usage. Both tools offer significant ROI by optimizing workflows and saving time.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,098 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 7.1%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Actions is 11.4%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Andrea Carella

DevOps Engineer at Politecnico di Milano

High availability, helpful support, and plenty of plugins available

I have used Google Cloud Platform and Amazon AWS for implementing Bamboo. It is not difficult to complete. The length of time it takes for deployment depends on a lot of variables, such as how the pipeline is deployed and what type of infrastructure is present. However, it typically takes only hours not days. I rate the setup of Bamboo a nine out of ten.

Read full review

MohamedMostafa1

Chief Software Engineer at Valeo

Handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurationsThe automation feature of GitHub Actions is

I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community."

"Bamboo was used extensively in our organization for PCA compliance."

"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."

"The tool is useful for continuous deployment."

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system."

"It can do the CI pipeline well."

"The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

More Bamboo pros

"GitHub Actions is a beautiful tool that integrates smoothly with all major tools, reducing CI/CD work by 30% to 40%."

"GitHub Actions can be easily configured, especially for environment variables and secrets. The UI is understandable and user-friendly for setting up CI/CD pipelines. I prefer tools like GitLab, where the pipeline starts quickly and is accessible near the commits for easy access. However, many CI/CD tools are interchangeable due to similar features of GitHub Actions and other similar tools."

"It offers numerous built-in features for pipeline management, release management, and even work item tracking on boards, which makes it a versatile tool that seamlessly integrates with hardware and facilitates optimization."

"The level of automation achievable is really good. So, the custom workflow creation and Marketplace Actions improved our project's efficiency."

"Creating workflows in YAML format is straightforward and easy to comprehend. This includes both understanding and writing workflows. Additionally, the downloading aspect for third-party instances can also be easily done. It's worth noting that vulnerability analysis and similar tasks should be part of our automation through data workflows. Furthermore, we can break down our processes step by step, starting from building, then moving on to analysis, testing, and finally deploying in production and the clear environment. All of these tasks can be efficiently managed within this platform."

"The solution has saved us approximately 20% in terms of efficiency and productivity."

"It improves efficiency as it involves no downtime and is managed by GitHub."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

More GitHub Actions pros

Cons

"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."

"The tool is not capable of using YAML efficiently."

"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it. It should have just two or three screens rather than hundreds of screens requiring a lot of clicking. It also requires a lot of integration. It has a steep learning curve. It takes a lot of time to understand and put in the data. There is also no proper training."

"The performance around the deployment feature could be improved."

"Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement."

"It's a little outdated. It's three years old."

"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."

"Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."

More Bamboo cons

"Switching between hosted and self-hosted agents can be a bit complex, as self-hosted agents need to be provisioned in platforms like Azure or AWS."

"The minor drawback of GitHub Actions is the management of the dashboard and pipeline runs, which needs improvement. The dashboard for running pipelines could be better."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"The UI could be better."

"GitHub sometimes makes it difficult to debug actions."

"The only issue I have faced is with authorization, particularly when configuring the GitHub token correctly."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"The main improvement would be to add support for more programming languages and frameworks."

More GitHub Actions cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins we...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

I would need to check with my team about specific shortcomings. We still use Jenkins ( /products/jenkins-reviews ) for some tasks, which suggests there may be areas for improvement in GitHub Actions.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 32% of the time

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 13% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 11% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 8% of the time

Bitbucket vs Bamboo

Compared 3% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Tekton vs GitHub Actions

Compared 35% of the time

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 10% of the time

CircleCI vs GitHub Actions

Compared 4% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Actions

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

May 2025

Download Bamboo product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

May 2025

Download GitHub Actions product report

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions

April 2025

Free Report: Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions

Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bamboo vs. GitHub Actions report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.