Bamboo vs Harness comparison

Atlassian and Harness are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Atlassian is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Harness is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. Atlassian holds a 7.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Harness’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Harness users who would recommend it.

Bamboo

Read 22 Bamboo reviews

2,364 Views
2,387 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Harness

Read 3 Harness reviews

2,131 Views
1,455 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Harness

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) space. Harness appears to have the upper hand with advanced features providing a compelling reason for its cost.

Features: Bamboo offers strong integration capabilities with various Atlassian products, making it valuable for teams using Atlassian tools. Its customization capabilities thrive in standardized environments. Harness provides innovative automation and AI-driven features that enhance deployment efficiency. Its continuous verification tools are pivotal for rapid detection and rollback of faulty deployments, and the ability to create dynamic pipelines with minimal effort gives Harness a distinctive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo demonstrates ease of use with robust documentation and community support, simplifying deployment for teams familiar with Atlassian products. Harness shines in its simplified deployment model using AI, offering an intuitive setup that reduces manual configuration and errors. It provides strong customer support with tailored assistance advantageous for complex scenarios, appealing to teams seeking to minimize manual interventions.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's pricing model is cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises within existing Atlassian ecosystems. Its setup costs are low, providing strong ROI for teams using Atlassian. Harness, with a higher upfront cost, offers substantial ROI in dynamic environments by reducing deployment failures and operational overhead through its automation capabilities, valuable for organizations prioritizing cutting-edge CI/CD processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. Harness Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. Harness

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (31st), Cloud Cost Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 7.4%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 6.6%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Andrea Carella

DevOps Engineer at Politecnico di Milano

High availability, helpful support, and plenty of plugins available

I have used Google Cloud Platform and Amazon AWS for implementing Bamboo. It is not difficult to complete. The length of time it takes for deployment depends on a lot of variables, such as how the pipeline is deployed and what type of infrastructure is present. However, it typically takes only hours not days. I rate the setup of Bamboo a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

"It can do the CI pipeline well."

"In Bamboo, build and deployment have been segregated. The build plan and deployment plan are different. When comparing Bamboo to other solutions, the native feature you will not find in another tool, such as Jenkins. They have segregated the build and deployment plan. This means, building the application and deploying it are two separate parts in Bamboo, they have segregated it apart from the UI. This makes the tool a bit better compared to other tools."

"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."

"We use Bamboo to automate all our test builds and deployments. It integrates with tools like the ReportPortal to help us check and evaluate processes. When we initiate commands, it automatically checks for scaling issues or failures related to new code. Based on these evaluations, it provides reports in the ReportPortal, helping us decide whether to implement changes."

"The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well."

"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services."

More Bamboo pros

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

Cons

"It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem to grasp, making it difficult to train new people and help them understand."

"Bamboo can improve by providing more with scripting, such as they have with Jenkins. Bamboo is more UI-driven at this time, Jenkins is going in that direction too."

"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it. It should have just two or three screens rather than hundreds of screens requiring a lot of clicking. It also requires a lot of integration. It has a steep learning curve. It takes a lot of time to understand and put in the data. There is also no proper training."

"Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added."

"The performance around the deployment feature could be improved."

"Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement."

"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."

"Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."

More Bamboo cons

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

Previously, when deploying a version that had been deployed successfully before, it sometimes failed upon trying again, which seems to be an intermittent issue about stability. I prefer the previou...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

I used Harness for CICD, and it served as the release platform that our team used for Java applications. We do Java microservices, and we used it to deploy them.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 32% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 26% of the time

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 12% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Bamboo

Compared 3% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 20% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 15% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudability vs Harness

Compared 5% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

April 2025

Download Bamboo product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download Harness product report

Also Known As

No data available

Armory

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. Harness

April 2025

Free Report: Bamboo vs. Harness

Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bamboo vs. Harness report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.