Bamboo vs Harness comparison

Read 7 Harness reviews

2,588 Views
1,863 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) space. Harness appears to have the upper hand with advanced features providing a compelling reason for its cost.

Features: Bamboo offers strong integration capabilities with various Atlassian products, making it valuable for teams using Atlassian tools. Its customization capabilities thrive in standardized environments. Harness provides innovative automation and AI-driven features that enhance deployment efficiency. Its continuous verification tools are pivotal for rapid detection and rollback of faulty deployments, and the ability to create dynamic pipelines with minimal effort gives Harness a distinctive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo demonstrates ease of use with robust documentation and community support, simplifying deployment for teams familiar with Atlassian products. Harness shines in its simplified deployment model using AI, offering an intuitive setup that reduces manual configuration and errors. It provides strong customer support with tailored assistance advantageous for complex scenarios, appealing to teams seeking to minimize manual interventions.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's pricing model is cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises within existing Atlassian ecosystems. Its setup costs are low, providing strong ROI for teams using Atlassian. Harness, with a higher upfront cost, offers substantial ROI in dynamic environments by reducing deployment failures and operational overhead through its automation capabilities, valuable for organizations prioritizing cutting-edge CI/CD processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. Harness Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

Bamboo vs. Harness

December 2025

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.4

Bamboo yielded high returns with low costs, boosting efficiency and saving time, translating to significant financial gains.

Sentiment score

9.0

Harness streamlines deployments, boosting efficiency, reducing errors, and lowering costs, validating its licensing investment through automation.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Time is saved because we now save engineering time. Before, it required two to three engineers actively monitoring production during deployments, but after starting to use Harness, there is zero or minimal manual monitoring.

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

Bamboo support is generally helpful, but users note service delays and prefer forums; satisfaction rates 6 to 8 out of 10.

Sentiment score

7.8

Users appreciate Harness support's responsiveness and effectiveness, praising timely incident reports, proactive notifications, and helpful communication.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Harness customer support is really helpful anytime I try to reach out; they are available to assist with any issues I am facing.

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.4

Bamboo's scalability is generally praised, but opinions vary based on remote agent technology and resource allocation challenges.

Sentiment score

7.7

Harness excels in scalability, supporting extensive applications, though performance may drop with over 20 integrations in enterprise settings.

If you need more agents, you just switch on more agents.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.

Ravi Hanok

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.8

Bamboo is generally stable, with most issues resolved by upgrades; users rate it highly for robustness and stability.

Sentiment score

7.2

Harness is stable and reliable, with minor integration issues and proactive communication during occasional downtime enhancing user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Harness is decently stable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Room For Improvement

Bamboo requires better user-friendliness, plugin support, integration, API improvements, and enhanced deployment models for enhanced developer experience.

Harness needs streamlined setup, better security, improved automation, and flexible pricing to enhance efficiency and user experience.

Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

There is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines.

Technical Associate at ZS

Flexible pricing models and more essential features in lower tiers could address this issue.

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Setup Cost

Bamboo enterprise pricing starts at $2000, with agent-based fees rising to $120,000 annually, prompting calls for flexible models.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Valuable Features

Bamboo offers seamless Atlassian integration, customizable CI/CD pipelines, extensive automation, and third-party support, valued for ease of use.

Harness simplifies deployment with automation, AI-driven error handling, and intuitive design, enhancing safety, visibility, and efficiency for microservices.

The main benefits Bamboo provides for me and my team are the automation to pick up code changes and automate the deployments, building images.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.

Ravi Hanok

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Meantime to recovery (MTTR) improved from 30 to 60 minutes before Harness to 5 to 10 minutes now.

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

The best features in Harness are its user-friendliness and setup configuration.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Cloud Cost Management (9th), Feature Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.3%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 5.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Harness	5.8%
Bamboo	4.3%
Other	89.9%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Automated delivery has made production releases safer and has reduced deployment incidents

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

The first point for improvement is the steep learning curve, where concepts such as services, environment, pipelines, and templates take time to understand. New users often need training before becoming productive, resulting in slower initial onboarding compared to simpler CD tools. An improvement idea is better guided onboarding with more opinionated defaults and examples. The second improvement can be on UI complexity and navigation; the UI can feel cluttered with many options and finding past executions, logs, or specific settings sometimes takes extra clicks, leading to small but noticeable productivity loss. Simplified UI views for common workflows and improved search and filtering could help. I also see cost and licensing as potential areas for improvement, as pricing can feel high for small teams and advanced features are tied to higher tiers, which may limit adoption for startups or smaller organizations. Flexible pricing models and more essential features in lower tiers could address this issue.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

What needs improvement with Harness?

What is your primary use case for Harness?

My main use case for Harness is continuous deployment (CD), specifically for safe, automated deployment to production, especially in Kubernetes and cloud environments. For continuous deployment in ...

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 18% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 16% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 10% of the time

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 7% of the time

Chef vs Bamboo

Compared 5% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Compared 17% of the time

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 9% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudability vs Harness

Compared 5% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bamboo product report

Bamboo

January 2026

Download Harness product report

January 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Armory

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced