Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CircleCI Logo

Top 10 CircleCI Alternatives

Vendor: CircleCI
3.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top CircleCI Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CircleCI based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Tekton. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

CircleCI surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled continuous integration and delivery with seamless GitHub integration, advanced caching strategies, and robust Docker support, ensuring efficient build processes and accelerated software deployment for development teams worldwide.

CircleCI Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CircleCI, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CircleCI Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI is favored for pricing and simplicity, attracting those prioritizing efficient setup. In comparison, GitLab appeals to users seeking robust features through its complete DevOps platform, offering substantial long-term ROI and extensive functionality for those with the required technical expertise.
Download CircleCI vs. GitLab Report
CircleCI has a straightforward setup cost, while GitLab may involve more complex initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI has a straightforward setup cost, while GitLab may involve more complex initial costs.
CircleCI Logo
CircleCI Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
CircleCI excels in pricing and support, appealing to startups and mid-sized firms. In comparison, VMware Tanzu offers advanced features like enhanced scalability, proving compelling for large enterprises. A tech buyer might choose CircleCI for cost-effectiveness or VMware Tanzu for comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
Download CircleCI vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
CircleCI offers a lower setup cost, making it a more affordable choice compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, which may require a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a lower setup cost, making it a more affordable choice compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, which may require a more significant initial investment.
CircleCI Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
CircleCI provides ease of use and robust documentation, appealing to teams needing fast setup. In comparison, Tekton offers extensive customization and flexibility with its open-source architecture, ideal for enterprises prioritizing scalability and extensive control over continuous integration and delivery pipelines.
Download CircleCI vs. Tekton Report
CircleCI offers a flexible pricing model that includes setup costs, while Tekton is open-source, resulting in lower initial expenses. CircleCI's comprehensive features justify its cost, whereas Tekton appeals to those prioritizing budget-friendliness.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a flexible pricing model that includes setup costs, while Tekton is open-source, resulting in lower initial expenses. CircleCI's comprehensive features justify its cost, whereas Tekton appeals to those prioritizing budget-friendliness.
CircleCI Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI offers cost-effective solutions with strong support and flexible configurations. In comparison, GitHub Actions provides seamless integration within GitHub repositories, enhancing workflow efficiency. Tech buyers might choose CircleCI for budget needs, while existing GitHub users may prefer Actions for its integration benefits.
Download CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions Report
CircleCI involves initial setup costs, while GitHub Actions typically provides a more straightforward setup process with potentially lower initial expenses. Differences in setup complexity and cost may influence the choice between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI involves initial setup costs, while GitHub Actions typically provides a more straightforward setup process with potentially lower initial expenses. Differences in setup complexity and cost may influence the choice between the two platforms.
CircleCI Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins, open-source and customizable, suits teams seeking flexibility and extensive plugin options. In comparison, CircleCI's ease of use appeals to those favoring cloud integration and straightforward processes for fast CI/CD deployments. Both offer distinct advantages for tech buyers.
Download CircleCI vs. Jenkins Report
Jenkins offers a lower setup cost compared to CircleCI, which tends to have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Jenkins offers a lower setup cost compared to CircleCI, which tends to have higher initial expenses.
CircleCI Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
CircleCI appeals to tech buyers with its favorable pricing, robust integrations, scalability, and excellent customer support. In comparison, Harness attracts those seeking advanced automation, sophisticated delivery capabilities, and long-term value, despite its higher cost and more intricate deployment model.
Download CircleCI vs. Harness Report
CircleCI has a minimal initial setup cost, making it attractive for startups, while Harness requires a higher upfront investment that might suit larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI has a minimal initial setup cost, making it attractive for startups, while Harness requires a higher upfront investment that might suit larger enterprises.
CircleCI Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity provides extensive plugin support and platform independence, ideal for complex integrations. In comparison, CircleCI offers container-based builds and simple GitHub integration, catering to teams seeking easy navigation and faster deployment.
Download CircleCI vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity charges a one-time setup fee, while CircleCI offers a no-cost setup.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity charges a one-time setup fee, while CircleCI offers a no-cost setup.
CircleCI Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
Bamboo integrates with Atlassian tools, offering customizable pipelines and flexible deployments. In comparison, CircleCI's GitHub integration and container-based builds simplify continuous integration. Bamboo's multi-environment support appeals to complex deployments, while CircleCI's YAML configuration eases straightforward deployments.
Download Bamboo vs. CircleCI Report
Bamboo requires an initial investment for setup, while CircleCI offers a more cost-effective setup process. CircleCI's setup approach provides budget-conscious teams a smoother, cheaper start.
View comparison
Pricing
Bamboo requires an initial investment for setup, while CircleCI offers a more cost-effective setup process. CircleCI's setup approach provides budget-conscious teams a smoother, cheaper start.
CircleCI Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI offers fast performance and intuitive configuration, appealing to smaller teams with its straightforward pricing. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline enhances automation with AWS service integration, making it suitable for larger enterprises invested in AWS infrastructure despite requiring extensive setup knowledge.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI Report
CircleCI necessitates initial setup costs, while AWS CodePipeline offers a more streamlined process with no upfront charges, providing a distinct cost advantage for businesses prioritizing budget predictability.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI necessitates initial setup costs, while AWS CodePipeline offers a more streamlined process with no upfront charges, providing a distinct cost advantage for businesses prioritizing budget predictability.
CircleCI Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
CircleCI attracts budget-conscious teams with its affordability and responsive support. In comparison, CloudBees, with its extensive enterprise features, is suitable for large organizations seeking scalability. CircleCI offers simplicity, while CloudBees provides a comprehensive feature set for those willing to invest for long-term value.
Download CircleCI vs. CloudBees Report
CircleCI offers a cost-effective setup, while CloudBees incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a cost-effective setup, while CloudBees incurs higher initial expenses.
CircleCI Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
GoCD offers value in pipeline modeling with strong visibility, aiding deployments. In comparison, CircleCI's integration capabilities and flexibility cater to complex configurations. GoCD's cost-effectiveness suits specific environments, while CircleCI's cloud model and customization options provide quick, efficient integration with higher ROI.
Download CircleCI vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to CircleCI, making it a more budget-friendly option for teams starting with continuous integration. CircleCI, however, justifies its higher setup costs with advanced features and robust scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to CircleCI, making it a more budget-friendly option for teams starting with continuous integration. CircleCI, however, justifies its higher setup costs with advanced features and robust scalability.
CircleCI Logo
Bazel
1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Bazel
1 out of 5
CircleCI excels in integration and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Bazel is preferred for efficiency in building and handling dependencies. CircleCI attracts tech buyers with its intuitive interface and support, while Bazel appeals through its open-source flexibility despite intricate setup requirements.
CircleCI imposes no upfront costs, while Bazel has a minimal setup fee, highlighting the different economic approaches of both platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI imposes no upfront costs, while Bazel has a minimal setup fee, highlighting the different economic approaches of both platforms.
CircleCI Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
CircleCI offers simplicity and broad integrations, favored for efficient scaling and programming language support. In comparison, Buildkite excels in complex, customizable pipelines, making it ideal for enterprise needs with strong on-premise capabilities, beneficial for security and compliance-focused deployments.
Download Buildkite vs. CircleCI Report
CircleCI typically does not have an initial setup cost, while Buildkite has a notable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI typically does not have an initial setup cost, while Buildkite has a notable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses.
CircleCI Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
CircleCI offers efficient build pipelines with seamless GitHub and Bitbucket integration, ideal for startups. In comparison, AWS CodeBuild provides scalability and advanced AWS ecosystem integration, suitable for enterprises seeking deep integration capabilities and extensive pre-configured environments, justifying its higher cost.
Download AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI Report
CircleCI offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while AWS CodeBuild may involve more complex setup requirements. The setup choices between these two tools can significantly influence user preferences based on the ease and cost of onboarding.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while AWS CodeBuild may involve more complex setup requirements. The setup choices between these two tools can significantly influence user preferences based on the ease and cost of onboarding.
CircleCI Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
Travis CI attracts with its GitHub integration and ease of use. In comparison, CircleCI's advanced testing and parallel job execution appeal to those needing customization. CircleCI's cloud deployment offers scalability, while Travis CI's pricing benefits small teams.
Travis CI offers a minimal setup cost, while CircleCI provides a more comprehensive setup option with higher initial investment. Travis CI is ideal for quicker setups, whereas CircleCI caters to advanced configurations with its extensive setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Travis CI offers a minimal setup cost, while CircleCI provides a more comprehensive setup option with higher initial investment. Travis CI is ideal for quicker setups, whereas CircleCI caters to advanced configurations with its extensive setup.
CircleCI Logo
Bitrise
1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
Bitrise
1 out of 5
CircleCI offers extensive integration capabilities and customizable workflows suitable for diverse development environments. In comparison, Bitrise thrives with mobile-focused configurations, appealing to mobile app developers. CircleCI provides flexible deployment pricing, while Bitrise justifies cost with specialized mobile solutions.
CircleCI offers competitive pricing with no initial setup costs, while Bitrise requires a minimal setup fee. These distinctions highlight key pricing differences between the two CI/CD platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers competitive pricing with no initial setup costs, while Bitrise requires a minimal setup fee. These distinctions highlight key pricing differences between the two CI/CD platforms.
CircleCI Logo
SemaphoreCI
1 out of 5
CircleCI Logo
SemaphoreCI
1 out of 5
CircleCI is attractive for its community support and pricing, suitable for diverse environments with easy deployment. In comparison, SemaphoreCI appeals to those valuing performance and speed, justifying its cost with advanced features and efficient build times.
CircleCI offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive features, while SemaphoreCI provides a more budget-friendly setup, making it appealing for those with cost constraints. The pricing structures highlight a significant contrast in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive features, while SemaphoreCI provides a more budget-friendly setup, making it appealing for those with cost constraints. The pricing structures highlight a significant contrast in initial investment.

Related categories

Build Automation
AI Software Development
Application Security Tools