Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab comparison

GitHub and GitLab are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while GitLab is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. GitHub holds a 5.6% mindshare in RADS, compared to GitLab’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.
GitHub CoPilot
Read 27 GitHub CoPilot reviews
  • 2,490 Views
  • 2,301 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
GitLab
Read 84 GitLab reviews
  • 1,402 Views
  • 1,203 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

GitLab and GitHub CoPilot compete in the software development and version control arena. GitLab seems to have an upper hand with its comprehensive feature set that supports a wide range of DevOps activities, while GitHub CoPilot is notable for its advanced AI-driven code suggestion features, aimed at enhancing developer productivity.

Features: GitLab is recognized for its CI/CD pipeline management, repository control, and seamless integration capabilities. GitHub CoPilot, however, focuses on code suggestion, multi-language support, and test case creation, improving coding efficiency by reducing manual coding time.

Room for Improvement: GitLab could benefit from better integration with AWS, enhanced project management compatibility, and improved documentation. GitHub CoPilot needs more accurate code suggestions, support for more languages, and improved integration with various development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers flexible deployment options including public, private, and hybrid clouds, supported by community-driven assistance with limited response for free users. GitHub CoPilot provides on-premises deployment, relying on community and licensing-based support, but lacks GitLab's cloud flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is available as open-source and paid versions, suitable for small teams to enterprises, though the Ultimate edition might require business justification. GitHub CoPilot has a tiered pricing model, including a free version, with additional costs for enterprise use which can be substantial for larger teams.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot offers significant ROI with cost savings and productivity boosts, though perceptions vary by project and user.
Sentiment score
7.6
GitLab improves ROI by increasing efficiency, reducing deployment time, and enhancing DevOps through cost-saving, automation, and vulnerability management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
GitHub CoPilot support varies, with mixed user experiences; documentation and community assistance are often used over direct contact.
Sentiment score
6.8
GitLab's support varies by license; paid users praise responsiveness, while free version users rely on community forums and documentation.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerGaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot is praised for high scalability, supporting hundreds of users, though sometimes faces performance issues under heavy traffic.
Sentiment score
7.4
GitLab's scalable container architecture supports diverse environments, flexible deployment, and smooth integration, despite some configuration and scaling challenges.
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerSarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
GitHub CoPilot is praised for functionality despite stability issues, with reliability improving and suggestions for proxy handling improvements.
Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab is highly stable and reliable, with minor issues mainly under heavy load or during updates.
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerGaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewer
AS
 

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs accuracy, integration, stability, and affordability, plus broader language support and improved user control for better engagement.
GitLab users seek improved CI/CD automation, integrations, user interface, project management, security, pricing, and support for enhanced usability.
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewerSarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

GitHub Copilot offers free and paid versions with flexible pricing starting at $10, rated affordable by users.
GitLab provides flexible pricing with open-source access and paid tiers, catering to different enterprise needs and budgets.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerSarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerAndrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity with code suggestions, auto-completion, and multi-language support, enhancing efficiency and rapid development.
GitLab excels in UI, CI/CD, code management, and integration, offering user-friendly, efficient, and scalable development and deployment features.
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerAndrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
GitLab
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 3.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
Read full review
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements
The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Educational Organization
22%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?
The product is easy to integrate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable s...
See all answers
What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitLab?
Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 9% of the time
Claude vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Claude vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 8% of the time
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 7% of the time
Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 6% of the time
Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 5% of the time
More GitHub CoPilot Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab
Compared 25% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab
Compared 7% of the time
AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab Logo
AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab
Compared 5% of the time
Tekton vs GitLab Logo
Tekton vs GitLab
Compared 5% of the time
TeamCity vs GitLab Logo
TeamCity vs GitLab
Compared 4% of the time
More GitLab Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot
May 2025
GitHub CoPilot reportDownload GitHub CoPilot product report
Buyer's Guide
GitLab
May 2025
GitLab reportDownload GitLab product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fuzzit
 

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?
  • Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
  • Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
  • Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
  • Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
  • Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.
Which benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
  • Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
  • Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
  • Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab
April 2025
Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.