Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (5th), AI Writing Tools (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (4th), AI Software Development (13th), AI Content Creation (7th), AI Research (2nd)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 10.5%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 7.3%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot7.3%
Claude for Enterprise10.5%
Other82.2%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at WTW
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour."
"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
 

Cons

"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."
"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"There is a lot of hallucination happening in GitHub CoPilot sometimes; on one side, it provides production-grade environment code, but on the other side, it lacks understanding the context of what I tell it and hallucinates a lot."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
"GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The solution's accuracy and relevance could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"The solution is costly."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases. The system should be better at understanding when to reply directly with the foundational model ...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily use Claude for developing quick Python scripts, conducting research, and getting answers to complex questions. Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because ...
 

Also Known As

Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.