GitHub CoPilot vs Google Gemini AI comparison

GitHub and Google are both solutions in the AI Code Assistants category. GitHub is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. GitHub holds a 7.5% mindshare in AICA, compared to Google’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Google users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 31 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,637 Views
1,716 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Google Gemini AI

Read 17 Google Gemini AI reviews

4,764 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Google Gemini AI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

GitHub CoPilot and Google Gemini AI are advanced AI-driven productivity tools competing in the realm of development and data handling. While GitHub CoPilot has an advantage in IDE integration and code completion for developers, Google Gemini stands out with superior multimodal capabilities for diverse applications.

Features: GitHub CoPilot enhances coding productivity with context-aware suggestions and seamless IDE integration, supporting tasks like code generation, review, and debugging. It offers multi-language support and allows integration with IDEs such as Visual Studio Code, which is beneficial for complex projects. Google Gemini excels in handling text, image, and document prompts due to its multimodal large language model, proving versatile for complex data tasks and integration within Google's ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: GitHub CoPilot could improve the accuracy and relevance of suggestions and expand support for multiple files and complex codebases. Developers desire broader IDE integration and more refined management of AI suggestions. Google Gemini AI needs to improve handling of factual accuracy in long documents and enhance creativity for marketing tasks, also simplifying its setup process could benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both tools favor cloud deployment with GitHub CoPilot offering flexibility with on-premises options, whereas Google's hybrid model provides more choices with potential complexity. Community support for GitHub is robust, while Google's support ecosystem benefits from comprehensive platform offerings despite the complexity of its setup.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub CoPilot is competitively priced with flexible plans, providing good value especially for organizations due to productivity gains, though costly for personal use. Its ROI is significant in large-scale settings. Google Gemini offers moderate pricing, with trial costs seen as reasonable, yet full-scale deployments could be expensive. The effective handling of multimodal tasks boosts its ROI, despite some data accuracy concerns.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.4

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity, reduces costs by up to 40%, and improves ROI, especially for standardized tasks.

Sentiment score

4.4

Google Gemini AI reduces costs and boosts productivity, but ROI varies, with some preferring ChatGPT; production use requires paid APIs.

A lot of time is saved using GitHub CoPilot because the PR review process used to take two to three days, but now it takes about two to three minutes to analyze the complete PR, get context, and give the rating.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Workspace usage of Gemini 3 Pro for coding assistance significantly aids in building, prototyping, and preparing production-grade applications in a very short time.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

For some of the models it's actually free. It doesn't cost anything, but once you get to production scenarios in which you have to use the API, you have to pay.

Luís Silva

Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.9

GitHub CoPilot's support is generally satisfactory, with valuable community support but needs improvement in onboarding and response times.

Sentiment score

4.4

Opinions on Google Gemini AI's customer service vary, highlighting responsiveness but noting difficulties in accessibility and communication.

With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Whenever there's a downtime of GitHub CoPilot or any issue with login or plugins, customer support is good enough to solve those issues.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

GitHub technical support is excellent.

Majd Alasfar

AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Google Gemini AI has excellent customer support.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

They rely on a self-service approach, providing a lot of information online through blogs and documents.

Boris-Vishnevsky

CTO at AlphaNuTech

Microsoft has done better, though they're not great at it, but they seem to be more responsive.

Marcus Vandenbent

Senior Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

GitHub CoPilot is praised for its scalability, effective user support, and ease of license acquisition, with room for enterprise enhancements.

Sentiment score

5.5

Google Gemini AI is praised for scalability, efficiency, and infrastructure, with mixed opinions on cost and context window constraints.

It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

Multiple people using it get a lot of immediate and exact responses useful for fixing issues, debugging, automating, or enhancing features.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Google Gemini handles multiple PDF files and big files efficiently.

Moataz Ismail

Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It can conduct research quickly, taking only five to seven minutes to produce a ten-page research document with a reasonable executive summary.

Boris-Vishnevsky

CTO at AlphaNuTech

If you want to grow the amount of information that you want to insert into the model before you provide an answer, you have to use different techniques.

Luís Silva

Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

GitHub CoPilot is largely stable with minor glitches, mostly consistent but occasionally disrupted, especially in complex setups.

Sentiment score

6.9

Google Gemini AI is highly rated for stability, handling issues efficiently, though users note longer responses and pricing considerations.

In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Everything I've tried so far works without instability, bugs, or hallucinations.

Laurence Moseley

Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales

At times, I see Google Gemini AI hallucinate, and I feel that Gemini 3 Pro is too expensive for individuals like me, costing about thirty dollars per user per month.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

Recently, Google Gemini has been very stable, without performance issues.

Moataz Ismail

Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs improvements in accuracy, context awareness, language support, IDE integration, UI features, and automation capabilities.

Google Gemini AI needs better customization, interpretability, accuracy, and usability, with improvements in response time, UI, and learning curve.

Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Google Gemini needs more accurate answers and the ability to export data to Excel or Google Sheets.

Moataz Ismail

Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

When working on a 20-page document, Google Gemini sometimes loses context about earlier parts.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

Currently, it operates mostly autonomously, and while it provides structured activities, making the research configuration more accessible and flexible would be beneficial.

Boris-Vishnevsky

CTO at AlphaNuTech

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot offers free individual access and enterprise plans from $18-$20 per user, with negotiable pricing.

Google Gemini AI offers competitive pricing, but costs may rise with more licenses, setup fees, and currency fluctuations.

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Google Gemini is free.

Laurence Moseley

Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales

The per license cost is on par with others, but with the number of licenses, it becomes expensive.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

The feature of Gemini 2.5 research is highly discounted.

Boris-Vishnevsky

CTO at AlphaNuTech

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity with context-aware suggestions, multi-language support, and seamless IDE integration for efficient coding.

Google Gemini AI excels in multi-modal tasks, enhancing productivity with seamless integration and real-time, intelligent workflows.

It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.

BhavneetKaur

Vice President of Products at C5i

Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

Context awareness, inline autocompletions, rapid code prototyping, Agentic mode, and availability in multiple language IDEs are the best features of GitHub CoPilot.

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

The most valuable feature of Google Gemini is its ability to function as an intelligent assistant, providing accurate answers to natural language queries and performing translations.

Laurence Moseley

Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales

The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt.

Luís Silva

Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

It provides an experimental search module capable of scanning hundreds of websites to deliver summarized data.

Moataz Ismail

Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Gemini AI report

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in AI Code Assistants

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (8th)

Google Gemini AI

Ranking in AI Code Assistants

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Writing Tools (1st), Large Language Models (LLMs) (1st), AI Proofreading Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 7.5%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Gemini AI is 7.0%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	7.5%
Google Gemini AI	7.0%
Other	85.5%

AI Code Assistants

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

Uday Boya

AI Research Enthusiast and Developer at ADP

AI workflows have transformed prototyping and coding productivity across my daily projects

There is a steeper learning curve for advanced agentic features that could be improved, and hallucinations should be reduced. The answers provided are long, which is impressive but not efficient for users needing rapid, crisp responses. Providing concise answers would improve the user experience. Google Gemini AI's UI code is too vague and the designs are not very appealing. Google Gemini AI can improve its UI code and address hallucination issues. The long answers provided can be tiresome to read, and the pricing is too high for individuals like me. These considerations led me to give a rating one point less than ten. Native GitHub or Vercel export could be integrated, and the context could be increased to over two million tokens. A simplified agentic setup for the UI could also help non-technical experts handle it more effectively.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?

The pricing of Google Gemini AI is not well understood, so no feedback can be provided on the cost. It was thought to have come together with the device subscription.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Gemini?

Google Gemini AI is not used much because it does not appear to be as responsive or as effective as Alexa when responding to questions, queries, instructions, or commands. When in a room with Googl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?

Google Gemini AI is used for common, basic digital assistant queries such as asking about the weather and the time. Often there are conflicting responses from Google Home, Google Home Mini, and the...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 15% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 13% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon CodeWhisperer vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Cursor vs Google Gemini AI

Compared 25% of the time

Grammarly Pro - Enterprise vs Google Gemini AI

Compared 17% of the time

Jasper vs Google Gemini AI

Compared 5% of the time

Rytr vs Google Gemini AI

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Granite vs Google Gemini AI

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Gemini AI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2026

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Gemini AI

January 2026

Download Google Gemini AI product report

Also Known As

No data available

Google Bard

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Google Gemini AI integrates into Google Workspace for productivity, leveraging multi-modal capabilities to optimize tasks in text, image, and data handling. It balances cost and performance, enhancing operations through seamless real-time data processing and intelligent assistance.

Google Gemini AI is designed to enhance productivity through its integration with Google services, providing smart solutions for text writing, automated workflows, and image generation. It supports efficient data handling and intelligent searches, with real-time processing ensuring fast and accurate results. While it merges seamlessly with Google's offerings, there are areas for improvement like customization, data export functionality, and the interpretability of answers. Users have called for expanded context size, improved context retention, and enhanced factual accuracy along with creativity enhancements without hallucinations. Video creation features and a streamlined setup process are also on user wishlists.

What are the key features of Google Gemini AI?

Multi-modal Capabilities: Efficiently processes text, images, and data for enhanced task handling.
Google Workspace Integration: Seamless collaboration to boost productivity.
Real-time Data Processing: Ensures fast and accurate analyses and responses.
Intelligent Assistance: Facilitates dynamic searches and task automation.
Automated Workflows: Streamlines processes, saving time for users.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost and Performance: Achieves a balance for efficient operations.
Enhancement of Productivity: Boosts efficiency with seamless integration and task assistance.
Accurate Data Handling: Ensures precise data processing and real-time analysis.
Enhanced Creativity: Supports innovative solutions without hallucinations.

In specific industries, Google Gemini AI is employed to analyze financial services, enhance marketing strategies, conduct market research, manage internal documents, and provide real-time data analysis. It aids in creating test cases, generating emails, organizing documents, and enhancing intelligent searches, supporting strategic research initiatives efficiently.

Google

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Google Gemini AI report.

See our list of best AI Code Assistants vendors.

We monitor all AI Code Assistants reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.