Kiuwan and Coverity Static compete in the code analysis and security domain. While Kiuwan is favored for its economical pricing and flexibility, Coverity Static is preferred for its strong static analysis capabilities and security feature set.
Features: Kiuwan's strengths lie in its high-speed scanning, modularity, and detailed analytics, proving efficient for both manual and automated pipelines. It offers robust integration with Jenkins and JIRA, making it ideal for organizations with legacy systems. Coverity Static excels in static analysis capabilities with a low false positive rate. It provides powerful integration with Jenkins and GitLab, offering comprehensive compliance features and robust security advisories.
Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could expand its programming language support and improve report generation mechanisms. Users have noted a need for better integration with IDEs and Azure DevOps. Coverity Static should focus on reducing false positives and improving user interface usability. It could benefit from a more intuitive setup and improved SCM integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan offers flexibility with cloud and on-premises deployment options, but customer support feedback is mixed, with suggestions for more support channels. Coverity Static, largely deployed on-premises, receives higher ratings for its robust technical support and documentation. Both offer hybrid cloud capabilities, but Coverity's customer support is generally rated higher.
Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is considered cost-effective, pricing based on lines of code, which is advantageous for smaller applications. Its lower cost is a competitive edge over rivals like Coverity Static. Coverity Static is seen as more expensive, charging based on users, impacting larger teams. While Kiuwan aligns well with budget-conscious buyers, Coverity’s higher costs are justified by its comprehensive features for extensive organizational needs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Coverity Static | 3.8% |
| Kiuwan | 1.1% |
| Other | 95.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.
Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
