GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #33. GitHub holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 102 GitHub reviews

10,772 Views
7,540 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

3,551 Views
2,841 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (2nd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 2.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	2.7%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	96.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Abdulmunafz Mct

Full Stack Developer at Sri Krishna Arts and Science

Daily workflows have become streamlined as I manage projects, learn from clones, and host sites

The thing that has frustrated me is sometimes when I push using a Git command, I need to force the push, which is the main thing. The setup is frustrating because GitHub could add a repository with pre-installed packages or something since I need to install packages in VS Code before pushing and maintain it in the codebase. Git packages need to be installed manually, and if that was already in a GitHub repository, that would be much better. GitHub packages can be installed previously for the project upon the project requirement, and that is the thing I wanted to add here. That would be good. According to governance and security, I recently heard about some security issues in GitHub. I think that could be centralized and should consider those security issues and clear them. The AI capabilities there include Copilot or something else. I recently heard about security issues, but I do not know about it clearly. However, if security has been more tightened, it will be better.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"It is very helpful, time saving, and user-friendly."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"The flow process helps us keep our applications stable, the released version is always running smoothly, and once you get familiar with the system, it is very easy to use with a very user-friendly interface and user-friendly security."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

More GitHub pros

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"With Kiuwan, we were able to help our clients get a better visibility of their development activities and to mitigate risks."

"We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"Customer service is excellent."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"The technical support is very good, and we have received valid answers to our questions."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"The solution lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided proactively to customers."

"Could be more user friendly."

"When we were using GitHub, sometimes within a month or two, GitHub is down for some time."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

More GitHub cons

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I have been using GitHub for free, and recently I got a free education offer, such as educational resources. I believe it is GitHub Pro or something similar. I have been using the educational offer...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

I use GitHub for maintaining repositories, as it is easy to maintain freelance projects and to store college projects. I will be using it for hosting by providing a GitHub link. For one of my freel...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

GitLab vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 19% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

July 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

July 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a platform that enhances collaboration and version control among developers, utilizing robust integration tools and features suitable for distributed teams. Its capabilities cater to diverse coding and project workflows, supporting effective team contributions and project deployments.

GitHub efficiently manages code repositories, facilitating seamless collaboration in distributed environments. It incorporates features beneficial for continuous integration and continuous deployment with tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Recognized for its code-sharing, security, and branch management capabilities, GitHub serves as a versatile development hub. However, there's room for enhancement in project management, testing, and AI integration, with users expressing a need for better documentation, reporting, and enhanced user experience through improved automation and interface simplification.

What features make GitHub essential?

Version Control: Effective tracking of changes and management of code versions.
Collaborative Environment: Supports team-based collaborative projects across distributed locations.
GitHub Actions: Facilitates automation of workflows and seamless CI/CD integration.
Tool Integrations: Connects with platforms like Jenkins, Azure, Docker, and Jira.
Branch Management: Simplifies code maintenance and deployment processes.

What benefits should users consider?

Improved Team Productivity: Streamlines collaboration and project coordination.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks via GitHub Actions.
Enhanced Security Features: Provides advanced security measures for code safety.
Community Support: Access to extensive developer resources and community aid.
Versatile Usage Scenarios: Adapts to various development and DevOps environments.

GitHub is implemented widely in software development industries, supporting teams that require centralized platforms for code management. It is crucial for maintaining code integrity and facilitating developer communication. Industries rely on it for integrating tools essential for their CI/CD pipelines, accelerating project timelines, and organizing development tasks through collaborative workflows.

GitHub

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

August 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.