GitHub and Kiuwan compete in the software development space with a focus on version control and code quality, respectively. GitHub appears to have the upper hand in collaboration and version control, while Kiuwan provides superior security analytics.
Features: GitHub is recognized for its effective community support for open-source projects, version control, and integration capabilities such as Git Hooks and SSH keys. It also offers scalability, ease of use, and enhanced time efficiency. Kiuwan excels in software security and quality analytics, providing modularity, detailed reports, and quick scanning to ensure code efficiency and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Room for Improvement: GitHub users express the need for improved security, better integration with DevOps tools, and more user-friendly interfaces for non-technical users. They also see room for enhanced performance with larger files. Kiuwan users suggest improvements in syncing, technical support responsiveness, expanded language support, and faster analysis of new rules.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is mainly used in the public cloud with strong community support facilitating access and collaboration. However, its customer service is mixed, relying heavily on community forums for assistance. Kiuwan offers on-premises and hybrid deployment options, with generally satisfactory technical support that is rarely needed.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers an open-source platform with various free and paid tiers, generally seen as cost-effective, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as less costly than competitors, charging based on lines of code, offering good value for its analysis capabilities. Both platforms are considered to deliver a good ROI, with GitHub focusing on saving time in code management and deployment, and Kiuwan providing value through improving code quality and security.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
