GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kiuwan is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
2,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,474 Views
1,297 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Kiuwan compete in code management and software analytics respectively. GitHub has the upper hand in community support and collaboration, while Kiuwan excels in security and detailed analysis.

Features: GitHub offers strong community support for open-source projects, efficient source code management, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. Kiuwan provides fast code scanning, detailed reporting, and thorough security vulnerability analysis.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance project management abilities, improve tool integration, and offer a more intuitive user experience for non-tech users. Kiuwan could improve technical support response times, extend support for additional development frameworks, and reduce false positives in scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub, being cloud-based, offers deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, benefiting from vast community support even with mixed direct customer service reviews. Kiuwan allows for both cloud-based and on-premises deployments, though its security focus may complicate setup. Users find Kiuwan's customer service supportive, often relying on its technical community.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides a free version and diverse licensing options, suitable for various organizational needs, particularly cost-effective for open-source projects, despite some complexity in its licensing model. Kiuwan offers competitive pricing based on code lines, delivering value especially for enterprises focusing on security and quality, both providing substantial ROI by enhancing productivity and reducing time to market.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is valuable."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"It is really simple to set up."

More GitHub pros

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The ticketing system is not working."

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

More GitHub cons

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

August 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.