Kiuwan vs Klocwork comparison

Kiuwan and Perforce are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Kiuwan is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.8, while Perforce is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.2. Kiuwan holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Perforce’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,522 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Read 25 Klocwork reviews

3,353 Views
1,878 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Klocwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Klocwork and Kiuwan are leading tools in software analysis. Klocwork has the upper hand in static code analysis, while Kiuwan stands out in integration flexibility and reporting features.

Features: Klocwork is known for precise defect detection, wide language support, and comprehensive static code analysis. Kiuwan offers versatile integrations, strong reporting tools, and adaptability in diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork could improve its integration capabilities, update its technology stack, and enhance user-friendliness. Kiuwan needs better support documentation, more intuitive navigation, and expanded user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork's setup is straightforward but lengthy, with responsive support. Kiuwan's deployment is quick and user-friendly, though customer support experiences vary.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork has high initial setup costs but offers long-term ROI through detailed analysis. Kiuwan provides competitive pricing with quick ROI due to seamless integration and robust reporting.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Klocwork

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Klocwork

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Klocwork	1.4%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	97.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

More Kiuwan pros

"There's a feature in Klocwork called 'on-the-fly analysis', which helps developers to find and fix the defects at the time of development itself."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

"Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem."

"It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration."

"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis."

"The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."

"Technical support is quite good."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

More Klocwork pros

Cons

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

More Kiuwan cons

"What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity."

"The way to define the rules is too complex. The definition/rules for static analysis could be automated according to various SILs, so as to avoid confusion."

"This solution could be improved if they offered support of more languages including Ada and Golang. They currently only support seven languages."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release."

"Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."

More Klocwork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Check with your account manager."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Klocwork?

I work on tools such as Klocwork, LDRA, as well as Jira and Confluence, focusing more on the software quality assurance aspect. We use Klocwork for coding and aggregate checks. We use it for static...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 46% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Coverity Static vs Klocwork

Compared 28% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 27% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 14% of the time

Helix QAC vs Klocwork

Compared 6% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork

Compared 6% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

September 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

September 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Klocwork

September 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. Klocwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. Klocwork report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.