Fortify Application Defender vs Klocwork comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while Perforce is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Perforce’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Fortify Application Defender

Read 11 Fortify Application Defender reviews

1,527 Views
1,267 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Read 25 Klocwork reviews

3,638 Views
2,001 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Fortify Application Defender

Klocwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Klocwork and Fortify Application Defender are both prominent choices in the software security analysis domain. Klocwork is favored in terms of deployment and customer service, whereas Fortify Application Defender offers superior features and functionality, despite its higher cost.

Features: Klocwork offers advanced code analysis, integrates seamlessly with developer workflows, and supports incremental analysis, making it developer-friendly. Fortify Application Defender provides dynamic application security and a broader range of vulnerability coverage and is favored for its comprehensive threat detection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork requires enhancements in reporting capabilities, interface responsiveness, and support for a wider range of languages. Fortify Application Defender could benefit from improved documentation, simplified setup processes, and a more intuitive user interface to assist newcomers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, ensuring a smooth user experience. Fortify Application Defender presents a steeper deployment learning curve, but once users overcome this, they experience reliable performance; its customer support, though adequate, is not as accessible as Klocwork's.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork offers more accessible pricing with quicker return on investment, attracting budget-conscious buyers. Fortify Application Defender's higher cost is offset by extensive features, which many users find justify the expense over time, delivering long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Application Defender

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Klocwork

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Static Code Analysis (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Fortify Application Defender is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Klocwork	1.3%
Fortify Application Defender	1.2%
Other	97.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

VinothSivam

CTO at Abcl

Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines

I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten. However, I'm concerned about how it handles an increasing number of lines of code. As the complexity grows, so does the time it takes for the tool to review everything. I want more clarity on how Fortify Application Defender handles multiple threats. We have numerous endpoints, but the tool runs in our pipeline, meaning it operates in the cloud. All our code is configured there, and the tool runs integration testing, unit testing, user testing, and final production code tests. It's a day-to-day experience. It's utilized almost every day as part of our pipeline runs. Each team responsible for integration testing, human testing, user access testing, and preproduction testing runs it whenever they take a build.

Read full review

Krishna M Gopalakrishnan

Manager, Quality, Functional Safety, Cybersecurity Embedded Processing at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Experience with compliance improvements and efficiency boosts but static analysis engine shows a need for enhancement

One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improvement. Customers using different static analysis tools report more issues than with Klocwork, indicating that Klocwork's engine is not as superior. Klocwork should be able to analyze large codebases efficiently, supporting a desktop version for periodic small delta changes before pushing to the server.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization."

"I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy."

"Its ability to find security defects is valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology."

"The most valuable features of Fortify Application Defender are the code packages that are default."

"The information from Fortify Application Defender on how to fix and solve issues is very good compared to other solutions."

"Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications."

"The product saves us cost and time."

More Fortify Application Defender pros

"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively."

"Overall I find Klocwork's features superior for our needs."

"We like using the static analysis and code refactoring, which are very valuable because of our requirements to meet safety critical levels and reliability."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time."

"Technical support is quite good."

"It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration."

"Klocwork is user-friendly, with a client-server architecture that provides all needed compliance."

More Klocwork pros

Cons

"Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives."

"The biggest complaint that I have heard concerns additional platform support because right now, it only supports applications that are written in .NET and Java."

"Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking."

"The false positive rate should be lower."

"The licensing can be a little complex."

"The workbench is a little bit complex when you first start using it."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"I encountered many false positives for Python applications."

More Fortify Application Defender cons

"What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity."

"We'd like to see integration with Agile DevOps and Agile methodologies."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."

"Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"The way to define the rules is too complex. The definition/rules for static analysis could be automated according to various SILs, so as to avoid confusion."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

More Klocwork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."

"The product’s price is much higher than other tools."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."

"The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."

"The price of this solution could be less expensive."

"Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Transportation Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Application Defender?

I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Application Defender?

The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify Application Defender?

We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Klocwork?

I work on tools such as Klocwork, LDRA, as well as Jira and Confluence, focusing more on the software quality assurance aspect. We use Klocwork for coding and aggregate checks. We use it for static...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 9% of the time

Coverity Static vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortify Application Defender Competitors

Coverity Static vs Klocwork

Compared 21% of the time

SonarQube vs Klocwork

Compared 19% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 8% of the time

Helix QAC vs Klocwork

Compared 8% of the time

CodeSonar vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Fortify Application Defender product report

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

January 2026

Download Klocwork product report

Also Known As

HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender

No data available

Overview

Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

OpenText

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Sample Customers

ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork

February 2026

Free Report: Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Application Defender vs. Klocwork report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.