Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Ixia BreakingPoint Logo

Ixia BreakingPoint Reviews

Vendor: Keysight Technologies
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Ixia BreakingPoint?

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Get the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Ixia BreakingPoint, OpenText Core Application Security, Spirent CyberFlood and more!
Ixia BreakingPoint is the #34 ranked solution in AST tools. PeerSpot users give Ixia BreakingPoint an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Ixia BreakingPoint is most commonly compared to OpenText Core Application Security: Ixia BreakingPoint vs OpenText Core Application Security. Ixia BreakingPoint is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Get the category report
Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Featured Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

Read more reviews

Ixia BreakingPoint mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category stands at 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ixia BreakingPoint0.3%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)22.1%
Checkmarx One10.0%
Other67.6%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Ixia BreakingPoint is praised for its Layer 7 traffic generation for applications like Facebook and Netflix, its DDoS testing module, and a comprehensive ransomware and malware database. Users highlight its flexibility due to numerous protocols and options, making it excellent for IDP scenario testing and cloud application testing. The virtual variant simplifies deployment and maintenance with minimal personnel. Application simulation over LTE networks is also emphasized.
  • "The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."
  • "It is a scalable solution."
  • "I like that we can test cloud applications."

Room for Improvement

Ixia BreakingPoint could enhance its REST API for better tool control and improve preconfigured network settings. The flash GUI has improvement potential, and traffic generation's accuracy is questionable, especially for simulated applications like Netflix. SSL simulation and DDoS production simulations need refinement for realism. Users find configuration complex and pricing could be more competitive. Performance capacity on interfaces and UI mode packages require enhancement, and integration with a portal for webinars would be beneficial.
  • "The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."
  • "They should improve UI mode packages for the users."
  • "The price could be better."

Pricing

Enterprise users report varied costs for Ixia BreakingPoint licensing. Annual subscriptions generally range from €10,000 to $25,000, with pricing often adapted for use cases. Some small companies pay around $12,000 yearly, while larger organizations note costs reach $25,000. Licenses include all features without differentiation, and larger setups with private clouds may experience higher expenses. Customers mention the solution as costly, with monthly payment options available based on required services.
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

Popular Use Cases

Ixia BreakingPoint is primarily used for network and security testing, including stress testing, validation of network changes, and traffic simulation. Users apply it for simulating user web access, security testing such as IDS, anti-malware, and infrastructure performance, and testing legacy protocols. It's also utilized in security certification validation and verifying firewall policies. Ixia BreakingPoint generates traffic to simulate various scenarios and evaluates the impact of attacks on application traffic.

Service and Support

Customer service and support of Ixia BreakingPoint are generally quick and professional, providing responsive technical assistance and training. Users have dedicated support and find it helpful, although some experience delays when resolving hardware or software issues on-site. It requires a six out of ten rating for speed improvement.

Deployment

Ixia BreakingPoint's initial setup is generally straightforward, especially for basic tests in a lab or LTE network. BPS VE simplifies configurations with Network Neighbourhood and superflows. Users note that deployment can range from quick, five-click setups to more complex scenarios requiring extensive knowledge. For basic tests like DDoS attacks, the setup is easy and quick, often taking about one hour to a few days depending on testing demands and models.

Scalability

Ixia BreakingPoint is recognized for its scalability, notably in its virtual form. Users appreciate the simplicity of scaling traffic generation with virtualization. While some express limitations, particularly on hardware, others experience efficient scaling up to high traffic levels. Deployment of multiple testing blades enhances performance. Usage varies, with some having fewer users, while others engage thousands. Users rate its scalability at a moderate level, typically without significant challenges.

Stability

Ixia BreakingPoint shows strong reliability in tests spanning four to twenty-four hours. Users report it to be stable, with some rating it between eight to nine out of ten. While many highlight its consistency, some note minor stability issues linked to the Flash component. A few mention encountering a problem when switching to a new version. Overall, the majority describe Ixia BreakingPoint as a market leader with commendable stability.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise70
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
University
4%
Government
4%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Non Profit
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%

Compare Ixia BreakingPoint with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Ixia BreakingPoint

Ixia BreakingPoint customers

Corsa Technology

Related questions

  • 11
What Application Security Solution Do You Use That Is DevOps Friendly?
  • 17
Which is the most comprehensive open source Web Security Testing tool?
  • 69
What is the best Application Security Testing platform?
  • 9
When evaluating Application Security Testing, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 23
SAST vs. DAST: Which is better for application security testing?
  • 34
What tools do you rely on for building a DevSecOps pipeline?
  • 40
What does the Log4j/Log4Shell vulnerability mean for your company?
  • 42
Checkmarx or Veracode. Which should we choose?
  • 65
What are your recommended automated penetration testing tools?
  • 22
What are the OWASP top 10 in 2020?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
OpenText Core Application Security vs Ixia BreakingPoint Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Ixia BreakingPoint
Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint Logo
Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint
See all alternatives
 
Ixia BreakingPoint Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Staff QA Engineer at Virsec4.0We used Ixia BreakingPoint to test and validate security certifications for applications, focusing on IDP scenarios and multiple protocols. The solution's UI needs improvement, as well as testing features and matching interface performance with actual performance.
ManBusiness Directorager at CSG SOLUTION3.5I use Ixia BreakingPoint for security testing through traffic generation. Its most valuable feature is the extensive ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks. However, integration needs improvement, and a vendor-provided portal for webinars would be beneficial.
Business Unit Manager at BAKOTECH4.5I use Ixia BreakingPoint for building, backend, and verification firewall tasks. I appreciate the ability to test cloud applications, though the price could be improved. I haven't used other solutions or providers for this purpose.
Director at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5No summary available
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.5No summary available
SDWAN Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
Senior System Engineer with 51-200 employeesNo summary available
Product Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0No summary available