Invicti Web + API vs Kiuwan comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Kiuwan is ranked #34. Invicti holds a 2.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

Invicti Web + API

Read 37 Invicti Web + API reviews

13,849 Views
6,509 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

4,464 Views
3,527 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and Kiuwan compete in web application security and quality assurance. Acunetix appears to have the upper hand in user satisfaction for features and support, attractive to larger organizations due to its advanced scanning capabilities, while Kiuwan's lower price and ease of use appeal to smaller enterprises looking for cost-effective solutions.

Features: Acunetix offers comprehensive vulnerability detection for websites and applications, advanced PCI DSS scoring, and interactive transaction capabilities. It integrates extensively with CI/CD tools and provides fast setup with multiple scan scheduling options. Kiuwan provides fast code scans with detailed reports, supports various programming languages, and includes modularity for customized use.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance automation for web services, improve reporting features, and further reduce false positives. Performance on large-scale scans also needs attention. Kiuwan could benefit from better programming language support, an improved UI, and enhancements in handling false positives and report downloading options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds but experiences mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. It provides 24/7 technical support but sometimes lacks timely responses. Kiuwan primarily supports on-premises and public cloud deployments, with generally satisfactory and responsive technical support. However, it offers less deployment flexibility compared to Acunetix.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is perceived as more expensive, with pricing based on the number of domains and features, but delivers significant ROI through security improvements and reduced manual review time. Kiuwan is more affordable with pricing based on lines of code, offering ROI benefits through time savings and reduced resource allocation for manual testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,336 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Application Security Tools

13th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (29th), DevSecOps (7th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti Web + API	2.6%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	96.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are happy, we're not unhappy with Acunetix, but we are very impressed by some of the things that it has been doing."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments, allowing good dashboard visualization that can be reported easily to management, providing complete visibility on vulnerability metrics."

"I appreciate the features that Acunetix has for the speed and the fact that it is in the cloud, which does not put any resources in my network, so I can set up a scan, go to bed, come back, and see the reports in my email."

"It has been able to find some vulnerabilities, and we've been able to remediate our websites and vulnerabilities, thanks to Acunetix."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world."

"If an organization has 100 plus applications and wants to use an automated scanner, they should definitely go ahead with Acunetix because it is very cost-effective and will save time compared to focusing on other solutions and performing manual security assessments."

More Invicti Web + API pros

"With Kiuwan, we were able to help our clients get a better visibility of their development activities and to mitigate risks."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"Kiuwan has enabled us to give our customers peace of mind through early identification of code vulnerabilities and remediation before delivery to the customer."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"The solution will measure your development team, give a KPI for the CISO, reduce the time it takes to find and correct coding errors, and more."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."

"Acunetix provides the benefit of saving time for an end user. I would not say it saves money because the cost and license of Acunetix is far more than what others offer."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"The time to fix issues is not too quick, so in the case of time-restricted projects for some customers, this might become a problem."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"However, it doesn't seem very helpful or useful for scanning web services, and that has what I feel that the organization could work better on that."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

More Invicti Web + API cons

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The pricing and licensing models are poor."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The price is exceptionally high."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 15% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

October 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan

November 2026

Free Report: Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti Web + API vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.