Fortify Software Security Center vs Kiuwan comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kiuwan is ranked #29. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 8 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

5,209 Views
5,001 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

4,464 Views
2,857 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Kiuwan compete in the application security testing industry. Kiuwan appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and quicker deployment, which is preferred by many tech buyers.

Features: Fortify Software Security Center offers robust static and dynamic analysis capabilities and supports enterprises focused on security. It provides thorough security assessments, ensuring comprehensive application coverage. Users value its integration with various security compliance standards. Kiuwan is noted for superior integration with development tools, offering real-time feedback that enhances developer productivity. Its advanced metrics and analytics give development teams critical insights. Kiuwan is particularly advantageous for agile environments due to its ease of use and flexible configuration options.

Room for Improvement: Users indicate Fortify Software Security Center could improve with enhanced automation capabilities. Simplifying its reporting functionalities would also benefit enterprises. Its user interface could use a refresh to meet modern standards. For Kiuwan, users suggest improving the documentation to aid better understanding. More flexible customization options would increase user satisfaction. Additionally, enhancing scalability to support larger enterprise environments is suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Software Security Center is praised for its thorough deployment processes, yet it requires a significant time investment, which might not suit all teams. Its customer service is highly rated for being responsive and helpful. Kiuwan is credited with a quick setup and seamless integration, which fast-paced teams value. While its customer support is effective, it may not receive the same level of acclaim as Fortify's service.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify's pricing model provides long-term cost benefits despite potentially high initial setup expenses. It is seen as cost-effective over time, especially for larger organizations. Kiuwan offers a favorable pricing strategy, particularly appealing for its extensive feature set. Users feel the ROI justifies any upfront costs. This makes Kiuwan attractive to smaller to mid-sized organizations looking for value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortify Software Security Center	1.5%
Kiuwan	1.0%
Other	97.5%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

Enables centralized analysis and improves governance through seamless tool integration

The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console. You can centralize both static analysis and dynamic analysis, and correlate both analyses in one tool to get better results by combining those independent results from each solution. That is outstanding, and there is no tool I have seen on the market that offers these capabilities. I appreciate the interoperability with other solutions from Fortify Software Security Center. Because we are using Kiuwan, you can run Kiuwan analyses and integrate them with Fortify Software Security Center to get those results in a single console. That is a good console for centralizing things in one point. That is one of the best features of the on-premises Fortify.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."

"The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."

"It's very important because they want to scan their source code every day, so we provide CICD integration to our customers so they can auto build and auto test every day, get reports, and fix issues."

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

More Fortify Software Security Center pros

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"We have had an improvement of 20% in our time to market and it significantly improved the quality of our code."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"From the tool itself, the developer can run an analysis with the same quality, and with this tool, every developer has the opportunity to do an unlimited analysis."

"Kiuwan has enabled us to give our customers peace of mind through early identification of code vulnerabilities and remediation before delivery to the customer."

"The solution will measure your development team, give a KPI for the CISO, reduce the time it takes to find and correct coding errors, and more."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"The initial setup of this solution is very complex. Specifically, the integration between other parts of the solution is difficult."

"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."

"The support for Fortify on-premises is the same as for the other products. I would say the support is not good and I would rate it a three out of ten."

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"The pricing and licensing models are poor."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"More languages and frameworks would enhance this tool."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

"The solution is priced fair."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Check with your account manager."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

The pricing for the on-premises Fortify is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In my opinion, there are no areas that could be improved with Fortify Software Security Center. I would say it is a good product and a mature product. However, the SAST has many improvement areas. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

We have installed Fortify Static Code Analysis, SAST, in Ecuador in two customers. The Fortify ScanCentral includes three components: SAST, Fortify Software Security Center, and the WebInspect.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 19% of the time

Checkmarx IaC Security / KICS vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Appvance AIQ Platform vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 16% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

October 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

No data available

Overview

Fortify Software Security Center offers comprehensive application security through a centralized console that integrates static and dynamic analysis, making it essential for organizations focused on robust security operations.

Fortify Software Security Center delivers extensive capabilities that facilitate application security testing, code audits, and bug fixes. Its centralized console enhances governance and control, while its interoperability with tools like Kiuwan and Azure strengthens its functionality. The dashboard's intuitive data customization, along with the ability to store and report data on-premises, further complements its integration capabilities. Although improvements in dataset aggregation, integration with tools like Jira, and resolution of false positives are required, its ability to scan and analyze source code to identify security violations is acknowledged.

What are the key features of Fortify Software Security Center?

Centralized Console: Streamlines governance and control through combined static and dynamic analysis.
Interoperability: Enhances functionality with tools like Kiuwan for comprehensive testing.
Customizability: Tailors vulnerability testing to standards such as OWASP Top Ten.
Macro Recording: Facilitates multi-factor authentication processes.
CI/CD Integration: Ensures seamless integration with development workflows.
Collaboration Module: Supports teamwork with clarification on issues.
Daily Scanning: Elevates code quality through regular evaluations.

Why should users consider Fortify Software Security Center for ROI?

Code Quality Enhancement: Improves coding practices through continuous deployment and daily scanning.
Seamless Deployment: Enhances implementation success and mitigates security threats effectively.
Customization Flexibility: Offers tailored solutions for overlapping features despite increased costs.
Collaboration Efficiency: Boosts teamwork through detailed issue explanations and analysis.

Fortify Software Security Center is adopted in software-driven industries for its robust application security capabilities. Users in technology sectors rely on its static code analysis for auditing and security testing. Its on-premises deployment model and integration with platforms like Azure make it ideal for storing and reporting data, providing customization that aligns with industry standards.

OpenText

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan

November 2026

Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.