OWASP Zap and Kiuwan are key players in the application security testing arena. User feedback points to OWASP Zap as more favored for its pricing and support, while Kiuwan gains recognition for its comprehensive feature set, making it appealing despite its higher cost.
Features: OWASP Zap is known for effectively identifying security vulnerabilities, efficient scanning, and immediate vulnerability testing. Kiuwan is praised for its broad feature set, including advanced code analysis and integration capabilities, making it versatile for different use cases.
Room for Improvement: OWASP Zap users request improvements in performance speed and reporting tools. Kiuwan users seek more streamlined integrations and better documentation. Both sets of users desire enhanced usability features, with Kiuwan users seeking easier navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OWASP Zap is noted for straightforward deployment, though some users wish for more responsive customer service. Kiuwan provides detailed implementation support, but deployment can be challenging for some organizations.
Pricing and ROI: OWASP Zap is valued for its cost-effectiveness. Kiuwan, although more expensive, offers clear ROI through comprehensive functionality, appealing to those who prioritize an extensive suite of security tools despite higher costs.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.
The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.
With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
