

KVM and Nutanix AHV are prominent contenders in the virtualization category, with KVM having an advantage due to its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness. Nutanix AHV stands out for its infrastructure integration and comprehensive management.
Features: KVM offers open-source flexibility, integration with Linux-based systems, and support for real-time performance. Nutanix AHV provides seamless data protection, integration between storage and compute, and ease of management with its Prism interface.
Room for Improvement: KVM could benefit from improved user-friendly management interfaces and better support for Windows. Nutanix AHV requires enhanced integration with third-party applications and a more robust technical support framework.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KVM is supported by community forums and relies on Linux expertise for deployment, while Nutanix AHV offers streamlined deployment processes and strong enterprise-level support when bundled with its infrastructure solutions.
Pricing and ROI: KVM's open-source nature leads to significant savings, although optional paid support is available. Nutanix AHV, being license-free with Nutanix appliances, offers competitive pricing and eliminates extensive licensing fees, leading to substantial ROI for large-scale operations.
KVM definitely saves costs since it is open-source and does not obligate us to pay for licenses as necessary with other virtualization solutions.
We find a 100% return on investment with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, so there's no question about it.
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
We are getting the correct support personnel, who help us sort out our issues, so the support is very nice.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very much scalable, and we can scale up to 32 nodes easily, which is a huge size.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
The solution is very stable.
Upgrades and updates occur without any downtime, so it is 100% stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
Using Nutanix AHV Virtualization in a single management pane is very important to me, as it allows us to see everything related to our hardware, software, servers, and VMs from one console.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Nutanix AHV Virtualization | 6.5% |
| KVM | 8.5% |
| Other | 85.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.