

Proxmox VE and Nutanix AHV compete in virtualization and cloud infrastructure solutions. Proxmox VE has an edge in cost-effectiveness due to its open-source nature, while Nutanix AHV is favored for its streamlined management and seamless integration with hyper-converged infrastructure.
Features: Proxmox VE offers versatile hardware compatibility with options for bare-metal installation and support for both full and container-based virtualization. It features ZFS & Ceph storage support, built-in backup solutions, and open-source accessibility, which contributes to its impressive performance. Nutanix AHV stands out with its Prism console for management, integrates storage and compute services, and provides advanced features like one-click upgrades and enhanced disaster recovery capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Proxmox VE can improve its performance with MS Windows and the maturity of its VDI, in addition to refining USB handling and GUI stability. There is a call for better storage IO management. Nutanix AHV, on the other hand, could benefit from enhanced integration with cloud platforms and third-party software, and users have expressed a need for a more flexible GUI and improved orchestration. The level of third-party support could also be increased.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Proxmox VE is known for its straightforward deployment process and benefits from an active community for support, although its official technical support has room for enhancement. Nutanix AHV excels in hybrid cloud deployments with seamless management through Prism, offering a supportive experience, although community support for Proxmox VE remains valuable.
Pricing and ROI: Proxmox VE's open-source model allows for significant cost savings with no licensing fees and offers optional affordable support plans, yielding a strong ROI, particularly for budget-conscious operations. Nutanix AHV, although free with Nutanix hardware purchases, tends to have higher costs for expanded functionalities, affecting smaller budget deployments. Still, both solutions provide a clear ROI, with Proxmox benefiting from zero licensing fees and Nutanix delivering value in comprehensive setups.
We find a 100% return on investment with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, so there's no question about it.
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
We are getting the correct support personnel, who help us sort out our issues, so the support is very nice.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very much scalable, and we can scale up to 32 nodes easily, which is a huge size.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
The solution is very stable.
Upgrades and updates occur without any downtime, so it is 100% stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
Using Nutanix AHV Virtualization in a single management pane is very important to me, as it allows us to see everything related to our hardware, software, servers, and VMs from one console.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Proxmox VE | 13.0% |
| Nutanix AHV Virtualization | 6.5% |
| Other | 80.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Proxmox VE is a complete virtualization management solution for servers. It is a powerful open-source platform and supports two virtualization technologies - KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) for virtual machines and LXC for containers. Proxmox VE has a central user interface that allows you to manage not only VMs and containers, but also storage resources, network configuration, and high availability for clusters. It is enterprise-ready and is valued for its scalability and maximum flexibility, enabling you to virtualize very demanding workloads. Proxmox VE makes it possible for you to easily install, manage, and monitor hyper-converged (HCI) data centers.
Proxmox VE Key Features
The Proxmox VE platform has many powerful features, including:
pen-source software, high-available clusters, command line, fencing, a web-based management interface, flexible storage options, REST API, live/online migration, storage replication stack, software defined storage, virtualized networking, backup and restore, two-factor authentication, role-based administration, and VM templates and clones.
Proxmox VE Benefits
Some of the biggest benefits of Proxmox VE are:
Reviews From Real Users
Here is some feedback from some of our users who are currently using the solution:
A PeerSpot user who is a director at a tech services company says, “The most valuable features of Proxmox VE are the ease of containerization. Overall the solution is generic, feature-rich, and has compatibility.”
Another PeerSpot user who is a head of IT operations at a tech services company mentions that "In addition to the virtualization, the firewall and the routing functions that it provides are valuable."
Deepen D., director and CTO at TechnoInfotech, expresses that "The feature that I have found most valuable is that its storage container, LVM, and everything else work out of the box."
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.