Nasuni vs WekaFS [EOL] comparison

Nasuni and Weka are both solutions in the File System Software category. Additionally, 100% of Nasuni users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Weka users who would recommend it.

Nasuni

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

9,184 Views
1,837 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WekaFS [EOL]

Read 1 WekaFS [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Nasuni

WekaFS [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

Nasuni and WekaFS [EOL] are competitive solutions in cloud-based file storage. Nasuni seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer service, offering a cost-effective choice, while WekaFS [EOL] has superior performance and features.

Features:Nasuni provides cloud-native storage solutions with scalability, seamless data management, and integrated archiving. WekaFS [EOL] offers high performance with a low-latency file system, extensive customization, and integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Nasuni's deployment is straightforward, supported by excellent customer service. WekaFS [EOL] requires more complex deployment but offers powerful technical support.

Pricing and ROI:Nasuni is noted for competitive pricing and substantial ROI with lower upfront costs. WekaFS [EOL] incurs higher initial expenses but delivers long-term value and performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed File System Software Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nasuni

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (12th), Cloud Migration (6th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (34th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (18th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

WekaFS [EOL]

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Roberto Telezynski

Solutions Architect - Senior at Storageone

It's really fast, flexible new technology and we don't have any bottlenecks due to speed

It's really fast, flexible and new technology. We don't have any bottlenecks due to speed. We can snapshot all the data to object storage and replicate it to another site using the object storage features. You can take as many snapshots as you want to back up all your data. There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want. Apart from snapshots of data to object storage, you can also tier the data, which is a different procedure. They can provide huge bandwidth or throughput to a single client. This is a very special platform for working with high-performance computing. You can use a server like a DGX or an NVIDIA and provide individual clients with almost 200 gigabytes per second. This is where PowerScale and Isilon have major limitations. We don't have such limitations with Weka. That's why it's been indicated for high-performance computing clusters. I'm very excited to work with this platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have one platform to manage all of our data, to see it and to quickly access it, and that is huge."

"Nasuni has eased our job because we don't have to worry about the user requests for additional space anymore."

"I particularly like the restore process. Our financial teams make changes to spreadsheets and other files, and we've got teams using Photoshop files. They make mistakes and need to recover files, and we can do that instantly. We also have users who manage to delete folders, and we can bring them back instantly within a few seconds."

"Nasuni has helped to replace multiple data silos with a single global file system, providing a single platform with a 360-degree view of our data so we can secure it properly, ensure resiliency, and maintain the visibility required for strict regulations like GDPR."

"We use Nasuni's continuous file versioning feature and it fully protects us. With the ability to version files and have continuous recovery, it helps in terms of resiliency. If we have an incident then we would be able to easily recover from it by using the technology."

"The snapshot functionality and the unified file system are definitely the most valuable features for us. The UFS allows everybody across the organization to see the exact same data at the same time, instead of having different file servers with different structures on them, and that's mission-critical. We have different branches throughout our organization that have to act on that data."

"With Nasuni, we have been able to replace multiple data silos and toolsets with a single global file system, which is important to us because we have been able to consolidate several different products and solutions."

"We have less downtime and fewer trouble tickets from users who cannot access their shared files. Nasuni has reduced the friction and noise associated with file management because the devices are more reliable."

More Nasuni pros

"This is a very special platform for working with high-performance computing."

"There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want."

Cons

"We've had some organizational changes that Nasuni has not been able to keep up with, mainly from a data or file system perspective. Moving a filer from one management console has been a challenge. It lacks the flexibility to move files in and out of the management console. We have six management consoles now, and we're constantly telling Nasuni, "Hey, please allow us to move a filer from management console A to B." They can't do that."

"It is difficult to configure Nasuni. Adding a filer is an easy task, but deciding where to add them, how many to add, and what size to add takes a lot of time. I have to analyze my existing storage to understand how many users are going to access which folders. I have to design the Nasuni architecture accordingly."

"We forecasted that the data at my client's organization would grow by about ten percent annually, but we are migrating more data because we are bringing in some servers that had not previously been within the scope of our license. We expected it would take us two years to reach a specific amount of data, but we hit that mark in one year. The licensing cost skyrocketed, so we need to renegotiate. It puts us in a bind because we are reliant on Nasuni for our service strategy. We can't deny our customers, but we also struggle to pay for that."

"Nasuni is not a stable solution."

"The speed at which new files are created is something that could be improved. For example, if you create a new file in another country, I won't see it for between 10 and 15 minutes."

"The user-friendliness of its access needs improvement. When I log into the console, I see all the files that we handle globally. There are hundreds of Nasuni files that I can see on the console, but no way that I can filter them down. While this is a small thing, I need to scroll down and select the ones that I want. "Control F" doesn't work nor is there a dropdown menu that I can click on and select the ones that I want."

"One thing to consider is that Nasuni will have the same limitations that a traditional file storage solution will have, although that is because they are taking the place of a traditional architectural model. For example, Office 365 supports collaboration on documents such as Excel files and Word documents, but because Nasuni is a traditional file server, in that sense, it can't make use of that functionality."

"When we first set up our bandwidth limiting, we had a few problems when it came to managing it. This is something that could be made easier; however, we were able to make the changes that we needed to for our environment."

More Nasuni cons

"If the product included synchronous replication and VLAN integration, I would rate it 10 out of 10."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

"I would not say it is economically priced, but it is affordable. If you can afford to pay for it, it is worth the money, but it is definitely not overpriced. It is priced about where it needs to be in the market. We were satisfied with the way they did their licensing and how they handled it. I believe they actually license by data size. It is based on how much data is being held on the machine and replicated, and that's completely understandable. So, for us, their pricing was as expected and affordable."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

"Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive. When we first took Nasuni out, we were just paying for the service. We got storage at a reduced rate. It has now changed, and they're now more of an all-in-one type of thing. It can be quite expensive, but it works out. Apart from that, licensing-wise, it's very simple."

"The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

See all answers

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

See all answers

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Oracle ZFS vs WekaFS [EOL]

Compared 30% of the time

DDN EXA5 vs WekaFS [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Elastifile vs WekaFS [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Quantum StorNext vs WekaFS [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon FSx vs WekaFS [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More WekaFS [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nasuni

July 2026

Download Nasuni product report

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

August 2026

Download WekaFS [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

WekaIO Matrix

Overview

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Nasuni

WekaFS [EOL] offers a robust and scalable file system designed for demanding workloads, providing seamless access to data with high performance and low latency.

Targeting advanced data management needs, WekaFS [EOL] utilises a distributed architecture that ensures high availability and resilience. It supports diverse workloads, making it suitable for environments requiring rapid data access and scalability. Its design focuses on delivering efficient storage solutions for enterprises.

What are the key features of WekaFS [EOL]?

Distributed Architecture: Ensures scalability and reliability for large-scale data operations.
High Performance: Delivers low latency and high throughput, ideal for heavy data processing workloads.
Data Resilience: Provides robust data protection to prevent data loss in critical operations.
Unified Access: Supports both file and object storage access, enhancing data accessibility and integration.

What benefits or ROI should users look for with WekaFS [EOL]?

Scalable Storage: Offers the ability to scale effortlessly as your data grows, optimizing storage costs.
Improved Data Access: Fast and reliable data retrieval speeds up processes and increases productivity.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs through efficient data management and reduced operational overhead.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies deployment in existing infrastructures, reducing setup time and errors.

WekaFS [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and research, where rapid data access and large-scale data management are critical. Its flexibility and robustness support complex computing environments, ensuring seamless performance for industry-specific requirements and adaptations.

Weka

Sample Customers

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital

ZebraMed, Innoviz, TuSimple, Tre Altamira, IEX, iCarbonX, Mellanox, Spookfish, AI Singapore, San Diego Supercomputer Center

Find out what your peers are saying about CTERA, Panzura, Nasuni and others in File System Software. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.