Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Nutanix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 52 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

7,514 Views
7,439 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform compete in container orchestration, with OpenShift having the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust security appealing to enterprises prioritizing security and flexibility.

Features: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine integrates seamlessly with Nutanix infrastructure, offering simplified management and scalability as well as quick provisioning. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift boasts strong security features, extensive ecosystem integrations, and developer tools that provide an edge in flexibility and enterprise level security.

Room for Improvement: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine could enhance integration with non-Nutanix environments and expand its feature set for more diverse use cases. Red Hat OpenShift, while feature-rich, could benefit from simplifying its user interface and decreasing the complexity of its learning curve. Additionally, improving cost efficiency could enhance OpenShift's offering for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is praised for seamless deployment within Nutanix environments with effective support tailored to its platform. Red Hat OpenShift provides flexible deployment over a variety of infrastructures and offers broad ecosystem support, appealing to a diverse range of IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is known for its cost-effective setup that results in a faster ROI within Nutanix infrastructure. Red Hat OpenShift, despite higher initial costs, demonstrates substantial ROI through feature richness and scalability, catering to businesses seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Nelandran Moodley

Solaris UNIX Systems Engineer at Standard Bank South Africa

Consistent performance impresses users while technical support needs improvement

I definitely recommend Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform to other organizations due to its high availability, security, ease of use, and all the built-in features it offers. We do no maintenance for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform since ROSA is fully managed, and that's why it is a bit more expensive than EKS. The fully managed service includes 24/7 support, scheduling, and upgrades; we only need to inform Red Hat support about upgrades, and they manage the process end to end. Overall, I rate Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine; although I would say ten, I think it's important to allow room for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"Nutanix is very stable and reliable, based on my experience with many customers, including large banks and telcos."

"The technical support is excellent."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"Nutanix's support is really good."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."

"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."

"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."

"Integrating the product into our existing infrastructure was easy."

"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."

"The benefits I have seen from using Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform include that it provides a seamless application business, and the business is never going to be impacted because deployments and upgrades can be completed without impacting the real business."

"The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful for businesses. It also comes with features like OpenShift Virtualization."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement."

"The UI could be more user-friendly to drive tasks more effectively through the interface."

"The complexity of the installation could be reduced. While we got the necessary support, the instructions could be clearer."

"In my experience, the issues are not always simply technical. They do stem from technical challenges, but they struggle with the topic of adoption. When you encounter all of the customer pull, there are normally several tiers of your client pop that can adopt either the fundamental features or a little more advanced ones. The majority of the time, the challenge is determining how to drive adoption, how to sell the product to the customer, and how much time they can spend to really utilize those advanced features. If we get into much more detail, but this is from my perspective as the platform engineer and not the end customer, the ability of the end user to be able to debug potential issues with their application That is arguably the most important, let's say, work throughput in my area."

"I believe OpenShift Container Platform can improve in networking, architecture, and cloud areas by reducing deployment time, lowering costs, and streamlining engineer resources"

"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."

"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing is expensive for licensing."

"The pricing and licensing are handled on an upper management level, and I'm not involved in that, but I understand the solution to be somewhat pricey."

"We have to pay for the license."

"OpenShift Container Platform is highly-priced."

"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."

"Its licensing is completely incomprehensible. We have special people within our company. They discuss with Red Hat subscription managers. It is too complex, and I do not understand it. We are from the government, and we are trying to be as cheap as possible. Sometimes, I am just amazed at the amount of money that we have to pay. It is crazy."

"The license to use the OpenShift Container Platform is free. If you are capable with Java you can modify it."

"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten. There is a subscription called OpenShift Plus, which offers additional features and products the vendor provides to complement the OpenShift Container Platform. These include ACM, Red Hat Quay, and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feed...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenShift Container Platform?

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform needs some improvements, for example, in upgrade time, as normally, an extended upgrade method should be allowed, but sometimes if anyone clicks twice, it tries...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

Docker vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 61% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 10% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Docker vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

January 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

January 2026

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon

No data available

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.