Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Nutanix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 52 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

9,753 Views
9,655 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform compete in container orchestration, with OpenShift having the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust security appealing to enterprises prioritizing security and flexibility.

Features: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine integrates seamlessly with Nutanix infrastructure, offering simplified management and scalability as well as quick provisioning. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift boasts strong security features, extensive ecosystem integrations, and developer tools that provide an edge in flexibility and enterprise level security.

Room for Improvement: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine could enhance integration with non-Nutanix environments and expand its feature set for more diverse use cases. Red Hat OpenShift, while feature-rich, could benefit from simplifying its user interface and decreasing the complexity of its learning curve. Additionally, improving cost efficiency could enhance OpenShift's offering for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is praised for seamless deployment within Nutanix environments with effective support tailored to its platform. Red Hat OpenShift provides flexible deployment over a variety of infrastructures and offers broad ecosystem support, appealing to a diverse range of IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is known for its cost-effective setup that results in a faster ROI within Nutanix infrastructure. Red Hat OpenShift, despite higher initial costs, demonstrates substantial ROI through feature richness and scalability, catering to businesses seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Saleem Tamton

Open Shift Lead at Al Rajhi Bank

Seamless upgrades have protected business operations and support secure, flexible deployments

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform needs some improvements, for example, in upgrade time, as normally, an extended upgrade method should be allowed, but sometimes if anyone clicks twice, it tries to upgrade the second level and gets stuck, so that area should be enhanced. The strictness of the SSD and HDD also should be aligned, because in some environments, we cannot strictly make some rules related to HDD, since Red Hat is strictly making a rule after 4.16 to adopt SSD instead of HDD, which in some environments will not allow, so some workaround should be done on that. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is the best option, but as many companies and the world are mainly looking for security purposes, the clear text format needs to be adopted instead of any third party. Red Hat has to develop its own product, as HashiCorp and CyberArk Conjur exist, but Red Hat needs to protect the clear text format because the secret should not be seen by anyone. Currently, it is a clear text method allowing anyone in the namespace to see the username and password, which should be controlled in that way. The major improvements needed are related to upgrade time and strict rule-making.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"The technical support is excellent."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"Nutanix is very stable and reliable, based on my experience with many customers, including large banks and telcos."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

"It's a good tool and a very comprehensive tool."

"It has been a good solution to deploy all containerized applications."

"It automates rolling out new features, packaging the code, conducting security scans, and deploying to OpenShift."

"First and foremost we have benefited vastly in cost reduction."

"It’s user-friendly."

"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and logging functionalities."

"The console or the GUI of OpenShift is awesome. You can do a lot of things from there. You can perform administration tasks as well as development tasks."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

"There have been cases where we've deployed with Karbon and haven't seen that it includes errors."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

"In my experience, the issues are not always simply technical. They do stem from technical challenges, but they struggle with the topic of adoption. When you encounter all of the customer pull, there are normally several tiers of your client pop that can adopt either the fundamental features or a little more advanced ones. The majority of the time, the challenge is determining how to drive adoption, how to sell the product to the customer, and how much time they can spend to really utilize those advanced features. If we get into much more detail, but this is from my perspective as the platform engineer and not the end customer, the ability of the end user to be able to debug potential issues with their application That is arguably the most important, let's say, work throughput in my area."

"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."

"The stability needs improvement."

"The support costs are too high."

"The initial setup can be hard."

"Another thing that bugs me is that they removed the software in NFS storage. I don't understand why because this is a common type of storage. I am having problems with that, so I wish they would put it back."

"I believe OpenShift Container Platform can improve in networking, architecture, and cloud areas by reducing deployment time, lowering costs, and streamlining engineer resources"

"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"We paid for Cloud Pak for integration. It all depends on how many VMs or how many CPUs you are using. They do the licensing based on that."

"OpenShift with Red Hat support is pretty costly. We have done a comparison between AWS EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Services) which provides fully managed services from AWS. It's built on open-source-based Kubernetes clusters and it is much cheaper compared to Red Hat, but it is a little expensive compared to ECS provided by AWS."

"If you buy the product for a year or three, you get a lot of discounts...I feel that the product is worth its cost, especially since setting it up can be done with just a few clicks."

"Its licensing is completely incomprehensible. We have special people within our company. They discuss with Red Hat subscription managers. It is too complex, and I do not understand it. We are from the government, and we are trying to be as cheap as possible. Sometimes, I am just amazed at the amount of money that we have to pay. It is crazy."

"We currently have an annual license renewal."

"It largely depends on how much money they earn from the application being deployed; you don't normally deploy an app just for the purpose of having it. You must constantly look into your revenue and how much you spend every container, minute, or hour of how much it is working."

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing is expensive for licensing."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I don't have a technical role, but we are a system integrator, so we sell solutions such as OpenShift and Kubernetes as part of the sales team. We are a reseller called eSky IT, and I serve as the ...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feed...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenShift Container Platform?

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Docker vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 56% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 5% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Docker vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

June 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

June 2026

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon

No data available

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform enhances productivity with advanced security, scalability, and automation. It supports deployment across environments and is designed for cloud-native applications, making it popular for its role-based access control and efficient networking routes.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform provides a user-friendly interface and integrated management capabilities that streamline operations. Its auto-scaling features and seamless environment deployment are complemented by robust security through policy-based governance and built-in pipeline management. Users benefit from its flexibility and efficiency when handling enterprise-level tasks. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in costs, documentation, and ease of use, citing a steep learning curve and challenges with installation and updates. Enhanced training and support are in demand, along with pricing considerations and refinement of user interfaces and deployment processes.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform?

Advanced Security: Leverages policy-based governance for robust protection.
Scalability: Features auto-scaling to manage resources efficiently.
Automation: Integrated management capabilities enhance productivity.
Role-Based Access Control: Provides flexible user permissions for increased security.
Networking Routes: Facilitates efficient routing and communication.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlines operations through integrated management and automation.
Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model supports scalable deployments.
Security Compliance: Ensures secure deployments across environments.
Flexibility: Supports transitions from monolithic to cloud-based architectures.

Organizations in banking, telecom, and finance utilize Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform to deploy applications and microservices efficiently. It assists in managing Kubernetes environments, enhancing DevOps workflows, and integrating robust CI/CD pipelines. The platform supports cloud-native transformations and compliance, ensuring security in deployments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.