OpenText Silk Test vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

1,407 Views
900 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,519 Views
3,026 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

OpenText Silk Test and UiPath Test Cloud are automation testing products. Based on comparison data, UiPath Test Cloud has a slight edge due to its modern architecture and seamless integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Silk Test supports complex test scenarios with minimal scripting, integrates across multiple platforms, and offers a comprehensive test framework. UiPath Test Cloud's key features include AI-driven testing, seamless integration with the UiPath ecosystem, and robust support for RPA.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could enhance its cloud capabilities, improve initial setup processes, and expand AI functionalities. UiPath Test Cloud might enhance support for more programming languages, improve detailed logging for non-AI tests, and provide more customization options in user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test features a stable deployment model but requires significant initial setup. Its customer service is detailed but lacks the agility of cloud-native systems. UiPath Test Cloud offers fast deployment with a cloud-native model, supported by responsive and real-time customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test has higher initial setup costs but provides a strong testing framework for long-term ROI. UiPath Test Cloud offers lower upfront costs with flexible pricing, ensuring attractive ROI through scalability and efficiency. Overall, UiPath’s approach allows for quicker ROI by reducing barriers to entry and supporting agile deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.7%
OpenText Silk Test	1.5%
Other	94.8%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"Using this DLL functionality we were able to automate our product."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"With the help of SilkTest we've automated a bunch of routine regression tests, thus we saved our testing team weeks of testing time."

"Not many performance Testing tool provides end to end response times for scripts running on the page, this tool is capable of providing end to end real time browser response times."

"It speeds up testing efforts."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"The document understanding is good."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."

"I've seen a lot of potential users upset with the SilkTest due to broken installation."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

"At that time, we never had good technical support in Bangalore."

"Need to improve online documentation, community and forums to share issues encountered and solutions."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"Its price is a bit high."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

March 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

February 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Test Suite

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.