OpenText Silk Test vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 1.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

1,322 Views
859 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,433 Views
2,987 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

OpenText Silk Test and UiPath Test Cloud are automation testing products. Based on comparison data, UiPath Test Cloud has a slight edge due to its modern architecture and seamless integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Silk Test supports complex test scenarios with minimal scripting, integrates across multiple platforms, and offers a comprehensive test framework. UiPath Test Cloud's key features include AI-driven testing, seamless integration with the UiPath ecosystem, and robust support for RPA.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could enhance its cloud capabilities, improve initial setup processes, and expand AI functionalities. UiPath Test Cloud might enhance support for more programming languages, improve detailed logging for non-AI tests, and provide more customization options in user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test features a stable deployment model but requires significant initial setup. Its customer service is detailed but lacks the agility of cloud-native systems. UiPath Test Cloud offers fast deployment with a cloud-native model, supported by responsive and real-time customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test has higher initial setup costs but provides a strong testing framework for long-term ROI. UiPath Test Cloud offers lower upfront costs with flexible pricing, ensuring attractive ROI through scalability and efficiency. Overall, UiPath’s approach allows for quicker ROI by reducing barriers to entry and supporting agile deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.8%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.8%
OpenText Silk Test	1.4%
Other	94.8%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The pricing could be improved."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

January 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Test Suite

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.