Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement vs SAP Ariba Procurement comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle E-Business Suite iPr...
Ranking in Procurement Software
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Ariba Procurement
Ranking in Procurement Software
1st
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Procurement Software category, the mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement is 4.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Ariba Procurement is 25.0%, down from 25.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Procurement Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Ariba Procurement25.0%
Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement4.0%
Other71.0%
Procurement Software
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Moustafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable product with an easy initial setup process
We use Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement to procure raw materials such as cement for our company to produce finished goods The product has all the essential features to cover all our business requirements. There could be a mobile application for the product. The product has good stability.…
Argy Soudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has connected procurement and contracts efficiently while setup and support still require improvements
Support could be faster for critical issues with SAP Ariba Procurement. When patching happens and new releases come out, it can be hit and miss, though mostly it remains reliable. The on-time response is 99.9999%, but the main issue over the years has been with releases and patching. The initial setup of SAP Ariba Procurement is not straightforward. We have been trying to set it up for two and a half years for the council I work with. The personal account login is ready-made and allows landing page adjustments, but the overall software implementation can take forever and requires multiple teams to work on it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable product."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Salesforce provides me with the ability to create reports based on various parameters."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is one of the best tools in the market."
"The best features are the ease of use and the workflow management that allows me to understand every step in the approval process so that I can forecast the time through my request and its approval."
"Ariba allows us to manage our suppliers seamlessly."
"I like the guided buying features."
 

Cons

"There could be a mobile application for the product."
"The interface lags a bit since it is a heavy application."
"I would like the solution to be more automatic."
"Salesforce is expensive, with a subscription-based model."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"SAP could make it easier for people to become SAP Ariba consultants within the SAP ecosystem."
"Ariba Procurement tends to integrate best with other SAP products and is harder to work with if you have non-SAP products in your architecture."
"I would like to see more reports coming out of Ariba and more insights because it has to work in connection with SAP. So unless I run SAP and Ariba, I have to run. I am not able to see the utility of Ariba."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is more expensive than one of its competitors."
"The product is somewhat expensive. Only large organizations can handle such an application."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The licensing cost depends on the customer."
"The license is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Procurement Software solutions are best for your needs.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Hospitality Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement?
The product is somewhat expensive. Only large organizations can handle such an application.
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement?
The interface lags a bit since it is a heavy application. If the product is made lightweight, it can be much faster. The product needs to be made more user-friendly. I think that on the main page o...
What needs improvement with SAP Ariba Procurement?
Salesforce is expensive, with a subscription-based model. This poses challenges for small and medium enterprises due to the high costs of the cloud offering. There is a need for varying pricing bas...
What is your primary use case for SAP Ariba Procurement?
The primary use case of Salesforce is in the B2B space. I use it to capture, analyze, summarize, and record customer database and information. It is the de facto standard in the industry for such p...
 

Also Known As

E-Business Suite iProcurement
Ariba Procurement
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Portobello S.A., Gulf Air, Dubai Holding LLC, Grupo Aerom_xico SAB de CV, Flexera Software, Imperial College London, Byblos Bank SAL, Y-Telecom, Cyprus Telecommunications Authority, Trombini Embalagens S.A.
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle E-Business Suite iProcurement vs. SAP Ariba Procurement and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.