No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle GlassFish vs Tomcat comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GlassFish
Ranking in Application Server
13th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tomcat
Ranking in Application Server
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 3.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 13.1%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tomcat13.1%
Oracle GlassFish3.5%
Other83.4%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

it_user517413 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Developer
Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
Sanjay Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Capgemini
Customization and flexibility enhance web applications while support effectively resolves queries
Regarding improvements in Tomcat, I personally haven't used it very extensively, but all Apache products are very useful for our web applications. Although the web server setup is a little different, it has everything we have been using, and as of now, everything is good with no deficiencies that need improvement. I think that Tomcat needs a more robust logging error details feature; the current logging feature is available, but it should be more user-friendly. This improvement would make error handling more user-friendly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The products offers EE support."
"It's very stable. No problems at all. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"Tomcat is a lightweight application server, which makes it easy to deploy and install small applications."
"Tomcat is user-friendly and easy to set up, especially compared to WebLogic or JBoss where some specialty is required. If you are going for Tomcat, you can use their guidelines and can set it up easily."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the general web server features; it's simple and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the free EE server."
"Web apps are very easy to deploy."
"I find the quick startup valuable, particularly the static quick startup, and the server startup and application startup are very fast."
"Tomcat's best feature is the open source server. It's a flexible and lightweight solution."
 

Cons

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"Tomcat's performance is less than other solutions like IBM WebSphere or JBoss."
"If Apache can come up with a better solution to provide better security, that would be ideal."
"In terms of features, this solution is limited. It does do its job, but the enterprise-level features are missing."
"The stability must be improved."
"The configuration needs work."
"The enterprise support: Tomcat is an open source project, but for IT concerns, the enterprise support is needed when we encounter problems on it."
"Tomcat lacks a visual tool for configuring."
"Scalability is a major problem with Tomcat."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Tomcat's pricing is very cheap."
"This is an open-source product and it's free to use."
"If it is a community version of the solution, no payment is required. However, if it is a Linux version, we must buy the solution from JBoss."
"The price of the solution is good."
"Tomcat is not costlier than other solutions."
"The tool is free."
"There are no additional costs apart from the standard license."
"We are currently using the open-source version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Tomcat?
Tomcat lacks a visual tool for configuring. Everything is from the command line. I would like a visual tool for configuration to be added to Tomcat, as I see this feature missing.
What is your primary use case for Tomcat?
I work with Tomcat as a programmer, but not as an administrator. My major use case involves using Tomcat, mostly enclosed in any Java image for a Java application for REST API. I do not work with t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tomcat?
I am familiar with pricing for Tomcat. For me, it is open source. Since it is open source, I don't see any fee for that regarding whether the license for Tomcat is usually expensive or quite afford...
 

Also Known As

GlassFish
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting
1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Apache, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.