


Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and SUSE Rancher compete in cloud security and container management. Prisma Cloud is better for security due to its comprehensive features, while SUSE Rancher stands out in Kubernetes management, ideal for container-focused organizations.
Features: Prisma Cloud provides comprehensive security management, threat detection, and compliance tracking. SUSE Rancher offers robust Kubernetes management, multi-cluster operations, and support for containerized applications, excelling in Kubernetes integration and management capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Prisma Cloud could enhance its Kubernetes management and multi-cloud support, while improving integration with third-party tools. SUSE Rancher might improve its security features, enhance compliance capabilities, and refine its user interface for a more intuitive experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Cloud offers straightforward deployment with robust customer service, easing integration into existing security infrastructures. SUSE Rancher is flexible and easy to deploy in Kubernetes environments but could improve customer support to match Prisma Cloud's service level.
Pricing and ROI: Prisma Cloud has a higher initial setup cost, yielding ROI through increased security and compliance. SUSE Rancher, with its open-source model, provides a cost-effective solution with lower setup costs, benefiting ROI through Kubernetes management efficiencies. Security-focused organizations may prefer Prisma Cloud, while those valuing container management and cost efficiency might opt for SUSE Rancher.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
CallStream helps us integrate and automate tasks.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
Reputation and data security are the two most important things to a financial institution.
We may have prevented a security breach with remediation of the findings.
For cost reduction, we save a lot on manpower; instead of hiring a 24/7 team to do the provisioning, we could just hire a couple of teams to monitor SUSE Rancher Management to do the provisioning.
It definitely saved time and manpower.
Rather than dealing with three employees, after implementing SUSE Rancher Manager, we are able to do it with a single employee, which ultimately saves the cost.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
I would give them 10 out of 10.
The customer support is very friendly, and they are very fast in addressing the issues.
Since we were the partner for deployment, customer support was especially robust from the presales team at SUSE.
SUSE Rancher's customer support is performing well.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We haven't had any issues scaling the solution.
There aren't any limits to Prisma Cloud's scalability.
SUSE Rancher's scalability is working with high performance, and it can handle growth and additional clusters easily based on my experience.
It uses HPA in the backend, so horizontal pod autoscaling is by default inherited in SUSE Rancher.
It could scale significantly.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
Continuous monitoring is crucial to ensure system stability and avoid vulnerabilities or threats.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
Most of the time, when the client requires data, it is not available.
The cloud environment is dynamic, so the tool must be dynamic.
The tool is working fine with SUSE without any downtimes, technical issues, or critical errors.
There are some areas where it can improve, such as on the stability and reliability side.
SUSE Rancher is stable, and I have used it for monitoring my Kubernetes cluster.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Prisma Cloud is an excellent tool.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
The most pressing issue that I found in SUSE Rancher is that it is a bit slow. Compared with Komodor, it is very slow.
I wish the container could be more lightweight so that anyone can test and verify SUSE Rancher Prime.
One of the major challenges I faced with SUSE Rancher was during a POC for one customer who was using VMware. There was a significant challenge between VMware CSI and SUSE integrations.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
The cost was not on the higher side.
If you are using a single tool like Prisma Cloud, with a single license, you can monitor all environments, such as Google Cloud, Azure, AWS, and Oracle Cloud.
The pricing for what we are using is pretty good.
Rancher is free of cost for us as it is open source.
It is a very good tool to use, and it has a very good costing structure.
Licensing, which is per unit based, was straightforward.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
It provides a single pane of glass.
If I want to check how many of my S3s have encryption, I can write a Lambda function in Prisma Cloud and get that report.
Overall, the most valuable features for us in Prisma Cloud are those that provide visibility, ensure compliance with regulations, and help us align our on-premises servers and cloud environments with mandated security standards.
We use Rancher Desktop for local development, testing APIs locally, and it helps to seamlessly publish to the cloud.
SUSE Rancher has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to identify issues before they happen through monitoring utilizations and node pressure.
The openness helped in integrating the existing tools with SUSE Rancher itself, which was the biggest use case.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 7.8% |
| Qualys TotalCloud | 1.4% |
| SUSE Rancher | 0.6% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
SUSE Rancher manages and deploys Kubernetes clusters, simplifies container orchestration, and enhances DevOps practices, supporting multi-cloud environments and facilitating application scalability and monitoring.
SUSE Rancher provides robust Kubernetes cluster management and seamless integration with different tools and platforms, making it valuable for complex cloud infrastructures. It aids in automating workflows, ensuring consistent application performance across environments, and enhancing security with reliable RBAC. It simplifies operations with automated updates and comprehensive monitoring tools, supporting multiple Kubernetes distributions. SUSE Rancher offers centralized management of clusters with an intuitive experience, though it may benefit from better stability, performance optimizations, and improved documentation clarity.
What are the important features?SUSE Rancher is implemented in various industries where managing Kubernetes clusters and ensuring application scalability are critical. It supports complex cloud infrastructures, automating workflows, and integrating seamlessly with different tools, enhancing overall operational efficiency and security. In industries needing consistent performance and centralized management, SUSE Rancher proves to be an invaluable tool.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.