Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo

Top 10 Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Wiz, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive cloud security features such as real-time threat prevention, extensive visibility, and robust compliance, ensuring optimal protection and risk management for organizations across various cloud environments.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare enhances website performance with effective CDN and DDoS protection. In comparison, Prisma Cloud excels in cloud security and compliance monitoring. Cloudflare offers cost-effective pricing, while Prisma Cloud provides comprehensive security, making it ideal for enterprises despite higher costs.
Download Cloudflare vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cloudflare offers a simple, cost-effective setup, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires more upfront investment, highlighting a difference in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare offers a simple, cost-effective setup, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires more upfront investment, highlighting a difference in initial expenses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers dynamic workloads and AWS integration with Twistlock and PureSec for comprehensive security, ideal for broad compliance needs. In comparison, Wiz's Security Graph provides risk visibility and an agentless scanning approach for efficient broad visibility in cloud environments without overhead.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Wiz Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Wiz, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Wiz, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud provides extensive CSPM, CWPP, and CIEM capabilities for robust cloud security across providers. In comparison, SentinelOne excels in real-time threat mitigation and AI-driven analytics. Prisma suits multi-cloud management, while SentinelOne appeals to rapid threat response needs.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically involves a higher setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically involves a higher setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a more budget-friendly option.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring and integrations, ideal for proactive cloud management. In comparison, Prisma Cloud ensures robust security across diverse environments, suitable for comprehensive compliance needs. Datadog provides flexible deployment, while Prisma Cloud offers holistic security solutions, each with unique pricing models.
Download Datadog vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Datadog offers transparent setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex pricing model, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers transparent setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex pricing model, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels with dynamic workload identity and valuable runtime protection across clouds. In comparison, Snyk integrates easily, focusing on developer needs with container security. Prisma Cloud justifies cost with features, while Snyk offers valuable ROI through developer-focused security enhancements.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Snyk Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers competitive setup costs, while Snyk's pricing is more accessible for smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers competitive setup costs, while Snyk's pricing is more accessible for smaller teams.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers advanced security features like automated forensics and seamless AWS integration, appealing to those needing robust protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cost-effective solutions with strong Azure integration, attracting users within the Microsoft ecosystem seeking comprehensive compliance and CSPM capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks often has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a noticeable difference in upfront expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks often has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a noticeable difference in upfront expenses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels with advanced AI for threat detection and user alerts, with ease of deployment and strong support. In comparison, Prisma Cloud offers cloud-native security with compliance monitoring, excelling in multi-cloud integration, appealing to buyers needing superior infrastructure protection.
Download Darktrace vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Darktrace offers relatively higher setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace offers relatively higher setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides more budget-friendly options.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive code analysis with extensive vulnerability tracking and language support, appealing to SDLC-focused buyers. In comparison, Prisma Cloud delivers robust cloud security suitable for multi-cloud environments, attracting buyers needing holistic, automated cloud protection.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Checkmarx One is noted for its moderate setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks tends to have higher initial expenses, highlighting a primary difference in budget requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One is noted for its moderate setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks tends to have higher initial expenses, highlighting a primary difference in budget requirements.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Veracode excels in static and dynamic analysis, offering robust security intelligence for code. In comparison, Prisma Cloud provides comprehensive cloud native security and excels in cloud service capabilities. Veracode's integration simplicity contrasts with Prisma Cloud's extensive cloud coverage and flexible deployment options.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Veracode Report
Veracode offers low upfront setup costs appealing to smaller teams, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more robust initial expense suitable for larger organizations seeking comprehensive cloud security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode offers low upfront setup costs appealing to smaller teams, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more robust initial expense suitable for larger organizations seeking comprehensive cloud security solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management through continuous monitoring and sophisticated scanning capabilities. In comparison, Prisma Cloud provides advanced cloud security, focusing on workload visibility and runtime risk clarity. Tech buyers might prefer Qualys for network vulnerabilities and Prisma Cloud for comprehensive cloud-focused security.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which has higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which has higher upfront expenses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud security management, ideal for environments integrating AWS. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data governance, excelling in sensitive data management. Prisma's high cost may deter some, whereas Varonis offers competitive pricing for its robust features.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Varonis Platform Report
Prisma Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while the Varonis Platform requires a more substantial initial investment. The contrast in setup costs highlights Prisma Cloud's affordability compared to Varonis's more complex implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while the Varonis Platform requires a more substantial initial investment. The contrast in setup costs highlights Prisma Cloud's affordability compared to Varonis's more complex implementation expenses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform
4.3 out of 5
Imperva offers strong application security and DDoS protection, ideal for web threats. In comparison, Prisma Cloud provides comprehensive cloud-native security and automation, suitable for complex infrastructures. Imperva excels in on-premises environments, while Prisma Cloud integrates seamlessly with public and hybrid clouds.
Download Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Imperva Application Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with clear cost structures, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more complex setup process with variable pricing based on advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Application Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with clear cost structures, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a more complex setup process with variable pricing based on advanced features.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive integration across cloud environments with dynamic workload identity and AWS integration. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides robust threat detection and behavior analysis. Prisma Cloud excels in consolidated management, while CrowdStrike Falcon is preferred for lightweight sensors and central management.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers reasonable setup costs, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security features a more cost-effective setup approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers reasonable setup costs, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security features a more cost-effective setup approach.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiWeb enhances network security with application control and web filtering, integrating seamlessly with Fortinet products. In comparison, Prisma Cloud excels in cloud environments with strong multi-cloud support and identity-based micro-segmentation, appealing to businesses seeking robust cloud-native security solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Fortinet FortiWeb involves a moderate setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reflects a higher initial investment. This distinction highlights the upfront financial consideration for businesses evaluating each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiWeb involves a moderate setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reflects a higher initial investment. This distinction highlights the upfront financial consideration for businesses evaluating each solution.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in pricing and customer support, offering a cost-effective cloud security solution with comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, JFrog Xray provides superior features with advanced artifact scanning and integrations, targeting organizations needing extensive security insights despite higher costs.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers straightforward setup with variable initial costs, while JFrog Xray presents a more complex configuration requiring higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers straightforward setup with variable initial costs, while JFrog Xray presents a more complex configuration requiring higher upfront investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
AWS Security Hub excels in seamless AWS integration, ideal for AWS-centric environments. In comparison, Prisma Cloud's multi-cloud support and security integrations attract enterprises needing comprehensive identity management. Tech buyers may prefer AWS for cost-effectiveness or Prisma for its robust identity and integration capabilities.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud security and DevSecOps integration, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive posture management. In comparison, Azure Front Door offers excellent traffic management with web application firewall and CDN capabilities, suitable for budget-conscious clients focusing on efficient public cloud performance.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, providing extensive security features, while Azure Front Door offers a lower setup cost, focusing on efficient traffic management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, providing extensive security features, while Azure Front Door offers a lower setup cost, focusing on efficient traffic management solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center excels in vulnerability scanning and compliance reporting. In comparison, Prisma Cloud offers a comprehensive cloud-native security approach. Tenable focuses on vulnerability management features while Prisma provides a broader range of cloud security tools.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center is noted for having a straightforward setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more complex pricing structure. This difference highlights varying levels of initial investment for effective deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center is noted for having a straightforward setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more complex pricing structure. This difference highlights varying levels of initial investment for effective deployment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive security features suitable for complex multi-cloud environments with tools like Cloud Workload Protection. In comparison, Orca Security provides ease of use through its agentless deployment, simplifying integration and maintenance with features like SideScanning technology for deep visibility.
Download Orca Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup cost, while Orca Security offers a more flexible pricing model tailored for various needs, highlighting their different approaches to pricing and implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup cost, while Orca Security offers a more flexible pricing model tailored for various needs, highlighting their different approaches to pricing and implementation.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.7 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive security features for diverse environments with advanced integrations. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides robust traffic management but lacks multi-cloud security. Buyers may prefer Prisma Cloud for security needs or Azure Gateway for seamless Azure integration.
Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which is typically more budget-friendly. This notable cost difference can significantly impact the initial investment considerations for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which is typically more budget-friendly. This notable cost difference can significantly impact the initial investment considerations for businesses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud security and automated forensics, making it ideal for complex cloud environments. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF offers robust web application defense and superior protection capabilities, making it a strong choice for on-premises deployments and web security.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to F5 Advanced WAF, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to F5 Advanced WAF, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
VMware Aria Automation excels in automating infrastructure with integration ease, appealing to those managing existing VMware ecosystems. In comparison, Prisma Cloud offers multi-cloud security enhancements for tech buyers needing strong compliance and threat detection across various environments. Pricing reflects their advanced functionalities.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
VMware Aria Automation features a straightforward initial setup, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks may incur additional setup complexities and costs.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Automation features a straightforward initial setup, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks may incur additional setup complexities and costs.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers a comprehensive platform for cloud security posture management and integration with infrastructure as code, ideal for enhanced visibility and risk management. In comparison, AWS WAF focuses on web application firewall capabilities, providing targeted protection against web threats like SQL injection.
Download AWS WAF vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive features, while AWS WAF presents a more budget-friendly setup with essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive features, while AWS WAF presents a more budget-friendly setup with essential security functionalities.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cyera
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cyera
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud provides extensive infrastructure security and integration ease for diverse platforms. In comparison, Cyera offers advanced data protection with a focus on visibility and governance. Tech buyers may choose Prisma for comprehensive security or Cyera for data-centric privacy needs.
Download Cyera vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cyera requires more initial investment for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cyera requires more initial investment for implementation.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
BigID Next
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
BigID Next
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in cloud security, offering automated forensics and efficient network mapping, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, BigID Next provides detailed data insights and automated privacy management, appealing to organizations needing robust data governance across diverse data types.
Download BigID Next vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas BigID Next offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas BigID Next offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive cloud security with strong multi-cloud options and centralized management. In comparison, Trivy excels in code security, identifying vulnerabilities in multiple environments. Buyers might choose Prisma Cloud for feature depth, while Trivy appeals to budget-conscious users seeking effective scanning.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trivy Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves significant setup costs, while Trivy is generally more budget-friendly. The differences in pricing reflect their distinct features and market positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves significant setup costs, while Trivy is generally more budget-friendly. The differences in pricing reflect their distinct features and market positioning.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP excels in compliance checks and centralized firewall management. In comparison, Prisma Cloud offers extensive multi-cloud support and efficient threat detection. A tech buyer might value Check Point for visibility and control, while Prisma Cloud provides integration and security posture management.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a straightforward setup process, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a slightly more involved initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a straightforward setup process, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a slightly more involved initial setup.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers dynamic workload identity and AWS integration, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive multi-cloud security. In comparison, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall excels in configuration ease and pricing transparency, attracting those seeking straightforward deployment with responsive support.
Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is noted for its straightforward setup process, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more complex configuration stage. These differences highlight distinct user experiences during initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is noted for its straightforward setup process, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more complex configuration stage. These differences highlight distinct user experiences during initial deployment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive features and integrations, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive security. In comparison, Trend Vision One excels in competitive pricing and responsive support, appealing to those needing effective multi-cloud security with less granular features.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a competitive setup cost that appeals to larger enterprises, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security provides a more accessible pricing model suitable for small to midsize businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a competitive setup cost that appeals to larger enterprises, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security provides a more accessible pricing model suitable for small to midsize businesses.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform appeals with its simplicity, affordability, and ease of deployment, ideal for budget-conscious users. In comparison, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides extensive features and multi-cloud compatibility, making it a compelling choice for comprehensive, long-term cloud security investments.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers lower setup costs compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which provides a comprehensive solution but at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers lower setup costs compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which provides a comprehensive solution but at a higher initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in comprehensive security features, including container scanning and compliance management. In comparison, FortiCNAPP offers clear licensing and is effective for threat detection, though it lacks Prisma Cloud's advanced capabilities like micro-segmentation and broader deployment options.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than FortiCNAPP, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than FortiCNAPP, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Imperva Data Security Fabric
4.1 out of 5
Imperva Data Security Fabric appeals to those prioritizing robust database security through comprehensive protection and AI-driven monitoring. In comparison, Prisma Cloud suits enterprises needing extensive multi-cloud integration and workload protection, despite its higher cost. Imperva excels on-premises; Prisma Cloud targets hybrid and public cloud ecosystems.
Download Imperva Data Security Fabric vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Imperva Data Security Fabric typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which tends to have a higher entry price due to its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Data Security Fabric typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which tends to have a higher entry price due to its comprehensive security features.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in cloud security posture management with tools for cloud-native stacks. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector is known for its Web Application Firewall and DDoS protection. Tech buyers may choose Prisma Cloud for extensive multi-cloud security and Akamai for web application protection.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Akamai App and API Protector offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, catering to businesses seeking cost-effective application and API security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Akamai App and API Protector offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, catering to businesses seeking cost-effective application and API security solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
F5 Distributed Cloud Services
5.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in comprehensive security with features like cloud security posture management and automated compliance checks. In comparison, F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers superior application delivery capabilities, notably in traffic management, appealing to those needing advanced solutions.
Download F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a key pricing difference for businesses considering these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a key pricing difference for businesses considering these security solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers dynamic workload identity and AWS integration, appealing to buyers prioritizing visibility in hybrid environments. In comparison, Sysdig Secure's open-source Falco tool and network access management attract those needing robust, value-driven monitoring and runtime detection, especially in Kubernetes-focused setups.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Sysdig Secure Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers straightforward setup with varying cost structures dependent on feature selection, while Sysdig Secure involves a clearer pricing model with potentially higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers straightforward setup with varying cost structures dependent on feature selection, while Sysdig Secure involves a clearer pricing model with potentially higher initial setup costs.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive cloud-native protection, ideal for complex multi-environment needs. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall is tailored for Azure environments, emphasizing strong security against OWASP threats. A tech buyer might prefer Prisma Cloud for its extensive features, while Azure attracts with ease of integration and pricing.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup with an associated cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall requires a more complex installation but offers flexibility in deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup with an associated cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall requires a more complex installation but offers flexibility in deployment options.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
XM Cyber
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
XM Cyber
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive security management with real-time protection, valuable for comprehensive coverage. In comparison, XM Cyber focuses on advanced threat detection and simulation, appealing to buyers prioritizing specialized risk mitigation and faster ROI with cost-effective deployment and operational guidance.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. XM Cyber Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost compared to XM Cyber, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost compared to XM Cyber, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security with advanced threat detection and multi-cloud compliance, appealing to those needing extensive defense strategies. In comparison, Tenable Cloud Security focuses on vulnerability management, delivering targeted risk assessments, ideal for organizations prioritizing efficient vulnerability insights over broader security scopes.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Tenable Cloud Security Report
Prisma Cloud's initial setup costs are higher, providing comprehensive cloud security solutions, while Tenable Cloud Security offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on vulnerability management.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud's initial setup costs are higher, providing comprehensive cloud security solutions, while Tenable Cloud Security offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on vulnerability management.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels with a comprehensive security suite for multi-cloud environments and development pipeline integration. In comparison, SUSE NeuVector focuses on runtime security and network scanning. Buyers might choose Prisma Cloud for its multi-cloud capabilities or NeuVector for cost-effective runtime protection.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SUSE NeuVector Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally presents a higher setup cost compared to SUSE NeuVector, which often features a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally presents a higher setup cost compared to SUSE NeuVector, which often features a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security with integration across cloud environments, ideal for those needing extensive visibility. In comparison, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security focuses on Kubernetes-specific security, beneficial for organizations prioritizing containerized workloads with strong network mapping and monitoring capabilities.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing, making it a potentially more economical choice for businesses with cost considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing, making it a potentially more economical choice for businesses with cost considerations.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive security features like network visibility and cloud compliance, suitable for diverse needs. In comparison, Upwind provides specialized data protection and strategic pricing. Prisma Cloud ensures seamless integration across platforms, while Upwind's straightforward deployment caters to specific security requirements.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Upwind Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a straightforward setup cost, whereas Upwind offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a straightforward setup cost, whereas Upwind offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers extensive cloud security features with workload identity and multi-cloud integration, attracting tech buyers seeking comprehensive solutions. In comparison, NGINX App Protect specializes in application security management and efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing traffic management and session control.
Download NGINX App Protect vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally has a higher setup cost compared to NGINX App Protect, which is known for offering a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks generally has a higher setup cost compared to NGINX App Protect, which is known for offering a more budget-friendly implementation.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud security, with features like dynamic workload identity and automated forensics. In comparison, Qualys TotalCloud efficiently manages multiple cloud applications with FlexScan and CSPM, offering a centralized platform for vulnerability management across hybrid environments.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Qualys TotalCloud Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a setup cost that may be perceived as higher, while Qualys TotalCloud offers a more competitive pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a setup cost that may be perceived as higher, while Qualys TotalCloud offers a more competitive pricing structure.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers broad cloud-native security with robust integration for diverse environments. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF focuses on application security with AI-driven threat detection, also lauded for effective customer service and clear pricing, attracting different preferences in security management needs.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is noted for its streamlined setup process, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF often incurs higher initial setup costs, highlighting a key distinction in the implementation phase of these cloud security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is noted for its streamlined setup process, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF often incurs higher initial setup costs, highlighting a key distinction in the implementation phase of these cloud security solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive cloud security with strong visibility and compliance, ideal for larger enterprises needing extensive integration. In comparison, Aikido Security delivers agile threat detection and quick ROI, appealing to businesses prioritizing rapid deployment and cost-effective threat management.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost, whereas Aikido Security offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial cost between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks requires a higher setup cost, whereas Aikido Security offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial cost between the two solutions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Sysdig Falco
5.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Sysdig Falco
5.0 out of 5
Prisma Cloud appeals to organizations needing wide-ranging protection with competitive pricing and broad integration capabilities. In comparison, Sysdig Falco provides advanced security functionalities and robust threat detection, appealing to those valuing feature depth and cost-efficiency through precise threat management.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, whereas Sysdig Falco's setup requires more initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, whereas Sysdig Falco's setup requires more initial investment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec
3.9 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers superior usability and customer support, ideal for rapid integrations. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec excels in integration capabilities and automation, making it suitable for complex, multi-cloud environments. Buyers may favor Prisma Cloud for ease and Rapid7 for extensive features.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks articulates higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, signifying distinct initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks articulates higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, signifying distinct initial investment requirements.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Cloud delivers extensive multi-cloud security with advanced features like runtime network mapping. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in L7 protection with DDoS mitigation and machine learning. Prisma's cost aligns with security needs, while Radware offers moderate pricing with tiered options.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more complex setup compared to the straightforward setup of Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a key difference in user experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more complex setup compared to the straightforward setup of Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a key difference in user experience.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, ideal for budget-conscious buyers needing basic security. In comparison, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks excels in cloud security features and integration capabilities, appealing to larger organizations seeking extensive protection across cloud environments.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex setup process and cost structure, highlighting their different approaches to deployment and financial transparency.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex setup process and cost structure, highlighting their different approaches to deployment and financial transparency.

Related categories

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
Container Security
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)