Aqua Cloud Security Platform supports container environments with strong features such as Docker and Kubernetes integration, efficient vulnerability management, and seamless runtime protection, making it a key choice for cloud and container security.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Aqua Cloud Security Platform | 3.1% |
| Wiz | 13.8% |
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 11.0% |
| Other | 72.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Wiz | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiz | 4.4 | 13.8% | 97% | 42 interviewsAdd to research |
| SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | 4.4 | 6.4% | 99% | 124 interviewsAdd to research |
Aqua Security Platform is highly praised for its ability to secure cloud accounts, provide runtime protection for containers and functions, and add an extra layer of security to applications and infrastructure. Users appreciate the Drift Prevention feature, which allows for immutable images and strong runtime security. The on-demand patching feature is particularly valuable for dealing with vulnerabilities without available fixes, and the sandboxing service allows for the identification of potential code vulnerabilities.
Users have expressed a desire for better CICD integrations, including more plugins and container images for easier automation. They also suggest integrating with a Web Application Firewall (WAF) for enhanced functionality. Users would like Aqua Security to provide more open documentation for easier access and searchability. Source code scanning and analysis features should align with best practices. Users find the solution generally usable but believe that it could be more user-friendly. Some users found the user interface (UI) theme to be a source of stress, and they would appreciate more security prospects and add-ons for improved security. Aqua Security's reporting capabilities are perceived as lacking, as they provide open issues without actionable solutions. Users would like to see more intelligence behind the reporting, better log ingestion, and improved interaction between SOC, cloud, and container security.
Aqua Security Platform has proven to be a valuable investment. Users have reported positive outcomes, highlighting increased security and protection for their systems. The platform has demonstrated a strong return on investment, offering peace of mind and mitigating potential risks.
Some users feel that Aqua Security Platform's pricing could be improved, while others find it to be competitively priced. A few users considered it to be costly, but most place it in the middle range.
Aqua Security Platform is primarily used to secure cloud media applications and container applications. It is utilized by individuals from the security side of companies, particularly for scanning public clouds or containers. The solution is used on-demand for application onboarding, application changes, and handling tasks related to container security, including zero-day attacks. It is also used for network security and integrated into existing or new pipelines for scanning and finding vulnerabilities in images, specifically in the context of Infrastructure as Code and Kubernetes clusters.
Customers generally find the support for Aqua Security Platform to be satisfactory. Some suggest that it could be more tailored to meet the specific demands of customers in different countries. Technical support has been described as quick and responsive overall, although there are occasions when it may take longer to receive assistance.
The implementation of Aqua Security Platform was mainly done by the customers with some guidance from a consultant. They utilized Java forms with manifest files and deployed one component at a time. The initial installation only took a few hours, but additional configuration and integration may take a few days to complete.
Some reviewers say that Aqua Security Platform is not a very scalable product, while others gave it a high rating for scalability. Some reviewers mentioned that the solution scales by itself, but it is restricted by licensing. Others noted that the cloud solution and on-demand scanning capabilities make it fairly scalable. However, there were concerns about pricing and costs when scaling up, especially when it comes to billing and the number of licenses consumed.
Aqua Security Platform is highly regarded for its reliability. Users have reported solid performance and have not experienced any bugs, glitches, crashes, or freezes.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 141 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 80 |
| Large Enterprise | 384 |
Aqua Cloud Security Platform focuses on comprehensive container and cloud security enhancements. It offers robust tools for Docker and Kubernetes, efficient vulnerability management, and on-demand patching. The platform is praised for its Runtime Protection, Drift Prevention, and robust documentation, promoting seamless integration with existing platforms. Image scanning, Digital Threat Analysis, and sandboxing services accentuate security measures while integration with Docker Hub ensures ease of use. Scalable runtime policies, image assurance, and dynamic threat analysis simplify security tasks. Challenges remain in developing web security portals and greater standard server integration. Enhancing reporting, simplifying training, and improving log forwarding are key goals. Resource consumption, clearer roles, automation, and code analysis are vital future considerations.
What are the most important features of Aqua Cloud Security Platform?Aqua Cloud Security Platform is leveraged in industries focusing on container security, vulnerability scanning, and securing Kubernetes configurations within CI/CD pipelines. It is employed for image assessments and network security, demonstrating its efficacy in cloud applications and workload protection. Efficiently identifying misconfigurations and risks in cloud environments, it provides scanning for public clouds and docker environments, emphasizing data protection and application visibility tailored to customer-specific deployments.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform was previously known as Aqua Security Platform, CloudSploit, Argon.
HPE
Salesforce
Telstra
Ellie Mae
Cathay Pacific
HomeAway
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Business Development Manager at Axoft Ukraine | 4.5 | I find this an excellent on-premises security solution, particularly for its invaluable image scanning, scalability, and responsive support. However, its complex installation, lengthy deployment, and management capabilities, especially for CSPM, need improvement, alongside some minor stability issues. |
| Manager|Cloud Security & Solution Architect| CloudOps|AppSec | DevSecOps | DevOps | CapOps | FinOps at Wipro | 4.0 | I use Aqua for flexible, scalable container security and find support helpful. Although the UI can be stressful and I'd like IaC vulnerability scans, it's stable and competitively priced. I rate it 8/10. |
| DevSecOps Engineer at Foodhub | 4.0 | I used Aqua mainly for image and document scanning in DevSecOps pipelines. It was user-friendly, stable, and easier to set up than Prisma. Although the user roles were confusing, I recommend Aqua for its straightforward implementation. |
| Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy | 4.0 | I primarily use Aqua Security for on-demand container scanning in public clouds, finding its vulnerability protection valuable and stable. While setup seems simple and it scales well, I believe user-friendliness could improve. I rate it 8/10 and recommend it. |
| Head - Cybersecurity at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I value Aqua Security's on-demand patching and sandboxing, finding it stable with easy setup and good support. However, its reporting lacks intelligence, the licensing model is flawed for scalability, and it's quite costly. I also dislike its US-only services. |
| Enterprise Cloud Architect at UBS Financial | 3.0 | We use this for network security, valuing its container security. However, we'd like better overview visibility and improved runtime security. We find it stable and scalable, giving it a 6/10 after five years. |
| Enterprise Cloud Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use Aqua Security for Kubernetes CI/CD security. Its scanner is valuable, but I wish logging to Splunk and resource consumption would improve. Despite some support issues, it's stable and scalable, and I rate it eight out of ten. |
| Data Scientist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use Aqua Security for robust container runtime protection, particularly valuing its Drift Prevention. However, I wish for more open documentation and advanced source code analysis, despite its good stability and scalability. |