Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RHEV vs VMware ESXi comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

RHEV
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware ESXi
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of RHEV is 2.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware ESXi is 1.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
VMware ESXi1.7%
RHEV2.9%
Other95.4%
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sujeet-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage
Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.
Syed Ali Waqas - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently manages development environments with robust network integration
I recommend new users download and evaluate the free version from VMware's website. Once satisfied, they should purchase the professional version for a smooth and secure IT infrastructure. The professional version is cost-effective, allowing one to create multiple servers on a single server. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has a good licensing module."
"Technically, the main reason why I'm using Red Hat is because of its stability."
"We find the ease of use of this solution to be invaluable. It is user-friendly and integrates well with other software."
"The biggest aspect for me is the disk usage, the virtual manager, and the deployment of machines."
"The solution makes migration easy."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan."
"The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good."
"This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products."
"ESXi stands out for its simplicity in setup, management, and monitoring."
"ESXi's integration with VMware vCenter offers centralized management."
"From a technical perspective, VMware ESXi's best advantages are its reliability and high availability features. It's a very mature and good environment."
"My customers are satisfied with the solution’s performance."
"The migration and combination of vCenter, where I can manage everything at once, has helped me do my job."
"VMware ESXi's most proven and beneficial area for our virtualization needs revolves around clustering."
"ESXi stands out for its simplicity in setup, management, and monitoring."
"All the features of VMware ESXi are very beneficial, particularly for virtualizing our infrastructure."
 

Cons

"Specifically, enhancements in managing virtual machine migrations, cloning, and the creation of different VMs could further optimize its functionality."
"In comparison to VMware, this solution isn't as stable. We're testing it right now, and we're not trusting the stability of the product."
"It lags behind in that you need to go to something like Fedora to get all the extra bells and whistles."
"The solution should be made more user-friendly."
"The availability of technical expertise with the solution may be limited in some areas."
"The UI should be more interactive with additional features."
"Customers are not aware of this solution, they can improve by providing more awareness and solution availability."
"I would love to see better documentation and ease of use."
"The solution’s licensing model could be improved."
"There have been issues with the tool's technical support and pricing of licenses, making them areas where improvements are required."
"Licensing now needs improvement."
"The tool offers an open-source version, which is not really well supported."
"The software could be more user-friendly, allowing customers to easily find the resources and features they need."
"The software could be more user-friendly, allowing customers to easily find the resources and features they need."
"Licensing has become a major issue. The new subscription-based licensing model is problematic."
"It would be really helpful if there were options to do things in one or two clicks rather than doing everything through more manual interaction."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."
"I believe we pay on a yearly basis."
"Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."
"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."
"I would say the price is acceptable."
"It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-support it."
"This product has a variety of licensing options available. However, the level of licensing, and therefore the cost of licensing, is dependent on the number of servers being utilized."
"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable."
"VMware ESXi is a costly solution in Africa and other developing countries."
"Since Broadcom's acquisition, the solution's price has been adjusted, and perpetual licenses are no longer offered."
"The tool has become expensive."
"The solution is priced on the higher side."
"I rate the product price as one on a scale of one to ten, where one is high price and ten is low price."
"The pricing is expensive, with the cost for customers ranging from $10,000 to $20,000 yearly."
"The product pricing was reasonable before, but recent changes, including bundling, have complicated the cost structure."
"If one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as an eight."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about RHEV?
The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?
It's the open source. There's not much cost. It's very minimal comparably. Compared to what I am paying for VMware, it's negligible.
What needs improvement with RHEV?
The RHEV management plane could be improved, particularly the management interface. Something more similar to a Google, Amazon, or Azure interface might attract people to use its management interfa...
What do you like most about VMware ESXi?
My customers are satisfied with the solution’s performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware ESXi?
VMware ESXi is extremely expensive now compared to a few years ago. It's a core-based license now. We have bought VCF for about more than 2,000 cores. It's not a user-based license, and when you co...
What needs improvement with VMware ESXi?
It would be better if it had some scaling out features such as Kubernetes, automatic scale-out features, or automatic scheduling scale-out features, without being in a containerized platform such a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about RHEV vs. VMware ESXi and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.