Top 10 RHEV Alternatives

Name: RHEV
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 3.9 (37 reviews)

Vendor: Red Hat

3.9 out of 5

37 reviews
80% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top RHEV Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to RHEV based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, and Proxmox VE. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. RHEV surpasses its competitors by offering superior scalability, robust security features, and seamless integration with existing IT systems, ensuring efficient virtualization management and reduced operational costs for businesses seeking reliable and high-performance virtualization solutions.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

VMware vSphere

4.4 out of 5

VMware vSphere

4.4 out of 5

RHEV attracts budget-conscious businesses with its cost-effectiveness and simplicity. In comparison, VMware vSphere offers extensive features like advanced resource scheduling, providing better integration capabilities, which may appeal to organizations needing robust support and sophisticated deployment, justifying its higher investment.

Download RHEV vs. VMware vSphere Report

Pricing

Purchase only the cheaper solution with support. I don’t recommend high-end licenses.

Compared with other vendors’ products, the pricing of the license is slightly lower. The annual S&S price is very affordable.

View comparison

Pricing

Purchase only the cheaper solution with support. I don’t recommend high-end licenses.

Compared with other vendors’ products, the pricing of the license is slightly lower. The annual S&S price is very affordable.

Hyper-V

4.0 out of 5

Hyper-V

4.0 out of 5

RHEV offers strong Linux integration and cost-effective pricing, appealing to businesses prioritizing these aspects. In comparison, Hyper-V provides seamless Windows integration, enhanced security, and scalability, making it ideal for enterprises needing advanced features and willing to invest in potential long-term ROI.

Download Hyper-V vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Hyper-V incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced feature set and integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Hyper-V incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced feature set and integration capabilities.

Proxmox VE

4.3 out of 5

Proxmox VE

4.3 out of 5

RHEV offers strong integration and management tools for enterprises focused on IT security and compliance. In comparison, Proxmox VE emphasizes open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to organizations needing scalable solutions. RHEV supports enterprise deployment, while Proxmox VE suits SMEs with community support.

Download Proxmox VE vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV typically incurs higher setup costs than Proxmox VE, which is known for its affordability. RHEV offers advanced features that may justify its price, while Proxmox VE provides a cost-effective solution with essential virtualization tools.

View comparison

Pricing

KVM

4.0 out of 5

KVM

4.0 out of 5

RHEV offers seamless integration with Red Hat products and solid management tools, making it ideal for those needing streamlined deployments. In comparison, KVM's open-source versatility and robust performance attract businesses seeking lower costs and customization for diverse workloads.

Download KVM vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

It is free and can be run from your laptop, if needed, unlike VMware.

It is cheaper than other competitors like VMware or Hyper-V.

View comparison

Pricing

It is free and can be run from your laptop, if needed, unlike VMware.

It is cheaper than other competitors like VMware or Hyper-V.

Oracle VM VirtualBox

4.1 out of 5

Oracle VM VirtualBox

4.1 out of 5

RHEV offers enterprise-level capabilities with robust management tools, appealing to large-scale operations. In comparison, Oracle VM VirtualBox provides cross-platform compatibility and ease of use, making it ideal for efficient deployment and budget-conscious users seeking a cost-effective virtualization solution suitable for smaller businesses.

Download Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV's setup cost is higher compared to Oracle VM VirtualBox, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV's setup cost is higher compared to Oracle VM VirtualBox, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

Oracle VM

4.0 out of 5

Oracle VM

4.0 out of 5

Oracle VM offers advanced live migration and hard partitioning, beneficial for Oracle products. In comparison, RHEV emphasizes security with SELinux and cost-efficiency, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Oracle VM excels in Oracle integration, while RHEV is known for its open-source affordability.

Download Oracle VM vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

Oracle VM has a lower setup cost, while RHEV demands a higher initial investment. This cost difference significantly impacts initial budgeting strategies for businesses considering these virtualization solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Nutanix AHV Virtualization

4.3 out of 5

Nutanix AHV Virtualization

4.3 out of 5

RHEV offers attractive pricing for cost-sensitive buyers, providing efficient scalability in Red Hat environments. In comparison, Nutanix AHV excels with seamless integration and advanced features, ensuring long-term savings. Tech buyers might prefer RHEV for affordability but choose Nutanix AHV for comprehensive capabilities.

Download Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV has a lower setup cost compared to Nutanix AHV, offering a more economical entry point, while Nutanix AHV provides a higher initial investment but with potentially greater integrated features.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV has a lower setup cost compared to Nutanix AHV, offering a more economical entry point, while Nutanix AHV provides a higher initial investment but with potentially greater integrated features.

Citrix XenServer

4.0 out of 5

Citrix XenServer

4.0 out of 5

RHEV appeals to cost-sensitive buyers with seamless deployment and diverse OS support. In comparison, Citrix XenServer, though pricier, attracts those needing advanced virtualization features and security. RHEV's strong customer service contrasts with Citrix XenServer's complex deployment, justified by robust technical support.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV has higher initial setup costs compared to Citrix XenServer; however, Citrix may incur additional expenses with premium support and advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV has higher initial setup costs compared to Citrix XenServer; however, Citrix may incur additional expenses with premium support and advanced features.

Spot by Flexera

4.3 out of 5

Spot by Flexera

4.3 out of 5

RHEV offers robust virtualization and efficient resource management, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Spot by Flexera provides automated cloud optimization and multi-cloud support, appealing to those seeking dynamic cloud environments with potential for greater cost savings and long-term ROI.

Download RHEV vs. Spot by Flexera Report

Pricing

RHEV is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Spot by Flexera offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Spot by Flexera offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing structures.

VMware ESXi

4.2 out of 5

VMware ESXi

4.2 out of 5

RHEV offers flexibility and budget-friendly pricing, attracting adaptable, cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, VMware ESXi provides advanced management tools and structured deployment, appealing to enterprises prioritizing scalability and support. RHEV focuses on integration, while VMware ESXi delivers long-term value through superior features.

Download RHEV vs. VMware ESXi Report

Pricing

RHEV has a lower setup cost compared to VMware ESXi, making it a more budget-friendly option; however, VMware ESXi offers a wider range of advanced features that could justify the higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Server Virtualization Software

Cloud Management

Cloud Operations Analytics