Citrix XenServer vs RHEV comparison

Citrix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while Red Hat is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.2. Citrix holds a 4.0% mindshare in SVS, compared to Red Hat’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Citrix XenServer

Read 56 Citrix XenServer reviews

6,275 Views
6,024 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

RHEV

Read 37 RHEV reviews

3,987 Views
3,947 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Citrix XenServer

RHEV

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

RHEV and Citrix XenServer compete in the virtualization platforms category for enterprise environments. Citrix XenServer appears to have a marginal advantage due to its advanced features, while RHEV is noted for its value with favorable pricing and support.

Features: RHEV provides robust management tools, flexible integration capabilities, and efficient resource allocation. Citrix XenServer offers advanced hypervisor technology, virtualization efficiency, and superior scalability.

Room for Improvement: RHEV could enhance its advanced feature set, scalability, and hypervisor innovations. Citrix XenServer might improve its pricing model, ease of initial setup, and user interface refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEV is recognized for its straightforward installation and reliable support, ensuring a smooth transition for IT teams. Citrix XenServer, though more complex to deploy, benefits from comprehensive documentation and a strong user community.

Pricing and ROI: RHEV is noted for competitive upfront costs and a strong ROI, suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Citrix XenServer, despite a potentially higher initial cost, justifies this with long-term benefits in performance and support for high-performance environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RHEV

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 4.0%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 2.4%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Citrix XenServer	4.0%
RHEV	2.4%
Other	93.6%

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Consulting benefits from robust consulting while also recognizing the need for improved disk management

When it comes to optimization, that's one of the weaker points of Citrix XenServer, especially regarding disk management, which is somewhat clumsy. Backup-related issues and disk management should be improved. Especially concerning backup, as discussions with Veeam engineers about Citrix XenServer backup strategy indicate there might not be a solution from Veeam soon. License optimization is not such a significant problem, but licenses are quite complicated. Vendors constantly invent new license models, making it difficult to order the correct licenses needed. There is not a big difference between Citrix and VMware products because Citrix can implement Windows and Linux anyway.

Read full review

Mike Neuliep

Linux Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has supported virtualization projects in side jobs but has required workarounds due to lack of maintenance

In my opinion, the best features of RHEV are that it is a real hypervisor and it is free, so it performs better than VMware. I have used the live migration feature in the past with RHEV. There is a free clone of it that is based on the open source. Live migration is a nifty feature if your app is not highly available and you need to do maintenance on a machine. You can migrate the VM off of it, do your maintenance, and move it back when you are done. RHEV has a high availability architecture with a built-in monitoring feature where you could see machines other than the one you are operating on. I tend to implement high availability not so much in RHEV, but by using standard application high availability strategies. Red Hat has another product specifically for high availability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to order and make payments online has streamlined our business operations and enabled us to reach a wider range of customers."

"The most valuable feature is its stability."

"The price is the solution's most valuable feature."

"Good alternative of VMware ESXi, you can use free version to try the product first and perhaps move to the paid version if you need support or you need features that is not available in the free version."

"Simply the ability to virtualize and make better use of existing resources is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Citrix Hypervisor integrates easily and I can manage the infrastructure better. If I need to take a machine down to expand the hard drive, I do not have to physically be here. I do not need to order new equipment or new hard drives. I can shut it down, increase the drive space and bring it back up."

"The product is a great option for enterprise-level organizations."

"The solution is extremely scalable."

More Citrix XenServer pros

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."

"Performance and security are key advantages of RHEV."

"It's a very good platform to build your virtual machines on and highly integrated with Red Hat itself and its satellites."

"The most valuable features of RHEV are all the tools, such as virtualization, management of cloud platforms, and integration of container environments. The solution has good compatibility between virtualization, content management, and cloud management. Having the full set of these tools is the advantage of it."

"I can control and manage everything. I know everything that's cooking inside. This is the best part for me."

"Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor has robust virtualization management features with proven enterprise security and performance."

"The solution has a good licensing module."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More RHEV pros

Cons

"There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity."

"I think the technical support could be better because we have received support directly from the Dell server instead of from Citrix directly."

"Bigger footprint than VMware, along with dependence on Linux in Dom."

"Windows guests are well supported, but Linux guests have limited support."

"The graphics user interface is pretty bad."

"The solution would benefit from faster technical support."

"The solution is too expensive and people are kind of moving away from Citrix. It's starting to become a problem. It is a primary reason that while we are rebuilding we're going to seek out open-source solutions."

"Citrix Hypervisor is expensive if you get it as a stand-alone product, so this is one area for improvement. Its price could be cheaper."

More Citrix XenServer cons

"With RHEV, the cyberattacks should be fewer. I want RHEV to be better protected."

"A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware."

"My teammates and I often complain that VMware is well-documented and has a large community since it is the de facto standard. I would love to see better documentation and ease of use."

"This solution could be more secure."

"There are two things that I would like to see improvement in when it comes to Red Hat. First is the pricing and second is the support."

"We hope that Red Hat can produce a paradigm edition. We are looking for paradigm computing and paradigm storage. Its scalability can be improved. It is not easy to scale, and we hope that Red Hat can provide a more scalable system. They should also provide local service and support. Our customers are looking for a good software vendor to provide professional services."

"Specifically, enhancements in managing virtual machine migrations, cloning, and the creation of different VMs could further optimize its functionality."

"The GUI interface needs improvement. Not 90%, but 50% or 60% of the work is done from the command line and so on, so the GUI needs work because people are looking for an easier way to manage the environment."

More RHEV cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is so important. Customers do consider the price seriously."

"We migrated from VMware to XenCenter to cut costs."

"This solution is open source, it's free."

"The cost of this product is not high."

"The most valuable feature is the cost; it is a free product."

"Citrix Hypervisor is a licensed product, and customers who buy the Citrix XenDesktop get Citrix Hypervisor for free. If they don't buy the license for Citrix XenDesktop, they'll need to pay for Citrix Hypervisor and its price is high. Pricing is even higher than VMware. The licensing policy for Citrix Hypervisor is good. It's straightforward. The only issue is the price because it's an expensive product."

"Citrix is a good low-cost alternative to VMware, so if budgeting is an issue then I would recommend it."

"The licensing is straight forward based on usage and features."

More Citrix XenServer pricing and cost advice

"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."

"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."

"We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance."

"It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-support it."

"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."

"Its price depends on the use cases."

"This product has a variety of licensing options available. However, the level of licensing, and therefore the cost of licensing, is dependent on the number of servers being utilized."

"We are using the free version of Red Hat."

More RHEV pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?

Licensing with Citrix XenServer is very cost-effective. Organizations save substantial money because competing solutions, such as VMware, cost double or triple. If you are using Citrix load only, t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?

There could be improvements in Citrix XenServer, but I cannot think of any at the moment. Overall, we are very happy with it.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Citrix Hypervisor?

Our main use case for Citrix XenServer is to monitor and ensure everything is functioning properly with Citrix and that all users can access the system. It is primarily used for monitoring since Ci...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?

It's the open source. There's not much cost. It's very minimal comparably. Compared to what I am paying for VMware, it's negligible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RHEV?

RHEV is not improving because it has been discontinued. It has been discontinued for years. I would love to get back into RHEV, but the job market is difficult and no one is hiring. RHEV is designe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RHEV?

I have done some consulting where I used RHEV, taking on side jobs to run virtual machines in the financial industry for a startup. The last time I used RHEV was in my home lab, but that has been d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 17% of the time

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 17% of the time

VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle VM vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 6% of the time

More Citrix XenServer Competitors

Hyper-V vs RHEV

Compared 20% of the time

VMware vSphere vs RHEV

Compared 17% of the time

Proxmox VE vs RHEV

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle VM vs RHEV

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs RHEV

Compared 4% of the time

More RHEV Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer

June 2026

Download Citrix XenServer product report

Buyer's Guide

RHEV

June 2026

Download RHEV product report

Also Known As

Hypervisor

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization

Overview

Citrix XenServer provides virtualization with high availability and robust security, offering seamless VM migration and centralized management through XenCenter. Its expansive compatibility and integration enhance its appeal, particularly for SMBs.

Citrix XenServer is recognized for its user-friendly virtualization capabilities, facilitating dynamic scalability and efficient resource management. It supports a wide range of operating systems and integrates with Citrix solutions for improved operations. Businesses benefit from its affordability and ease of deployment. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in third-party tool integration, network and backup management, and storage flexibility. High costs, limited Linux support, system complexity, technical support, and hardware compatibility remain challenges. An updated and intuitive interface is in demand for more seamless operations across platforms.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?

User-Friendly Virtualization: Simplifies virtualization operations with efficient management tools.
High Availability: Ensures continuous access to virtualized resources.
Robust Security: Protects virtual environments with comprehensive security protocols.
Seamless VM Migration: Facilitates easy migration of virtual machines across environments.
Centralized Management: XenCenter provides centralized control for resource management.
Dynamic Scalability: Supports scaling of resources as per business requirements.
Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Enables monitoring and optimizing of system performance actively.
Unlimited Virtual Machines: Offers the capacity for deploying numerous virtual machines without limitations.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Competitive pricing model reduces virtualization costs.
Comprehensive Virtualization: Complete solution for desktop and server virtualization needs.
Ease of Deployment: Quick and straightforward setup process minimizes downtime.
Integration with Citrix Solutions: Enhances functionality with existing Citrix technologies.

In diverse industries, Citrix XenServer is leveraged for server and desktop virtualization, cloud automation, and infrastructure management. Many deploy it for virtual desktop infrastructure, application delivery, on-premises data centers, and to support Citrix application delivery like XenApp and XenDesktop. Enterprises migrating from VMware often find Citrix XenServer cost-efficient for these applications, serving as a main computing platform for enterprise applications including ERP systems and SQL Servers.

Citrix

RHEV offers a cost-effective virtualization platform with support for up to 160 cores and 2 TB of RAM per host, emphasizing open-source accessibility and integration with applications like OpenStack.

RHEV stands out with features such as high performance, stability, ease of migration, and robust security. Its integration capabilities with diverse applications and the self-service Power user portal enhance its appeal for IT environments. While the platform's affordability compared to VMware is noted, areas for improvement include the GUI, user-friendliness, network virtualization, and the need for enhanced pricing and support in regions lacking system integrators. RHEV's ability to facilitate seamless migration from legacy systems to virtual environments is widely adopted in sectors such as government, banking, and IT services.

What are the key features of RHEV?

Open-Source Accessibility: Offers flexibility and customization options.
High Performance: Supports up to 160 cores and 2 TB of RAM per host.
Seamless Integration: Integrates well with applications like OpenStack.
Live VM Migration: Enables continuous operations without downtime.
Power User Portal: Provides self-service capabilities for users.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Optimization: Provides a cost-effective alternative to VMware.
Scalable Computing: Allows flexible resource allocation and scaling.
Migration Efficiency: Facilitates moving from legacy systems smoothly.
Robust Security: Enhances data protection and privacy management.

RHEV is widely used in high-computing tasks like AI and big data analytics within data centers, supporting cloud solutions, AI, and ERP systems. It's implemented in privacy clouds for industries such as government, banking, and IT services to migrate workloads from physical to virtual environments and optimize operational costs.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV

June 2026

Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.