Top 10 Citrix XenServer Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

55 reviews
82% willing to recommend

Top Citrix XenServer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Citrix XenServer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware vSphere, Proxmox VE, and Hyper-V. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Citrix XenServer surpasses its competitors by offering extensive virtualization capabilities, efficient resource management, and advanced security features, providing businesses with a reliable platform for building and managing modern virtual environments efficiently.

Citrix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Citrix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

VMware vSphere

4.4 out of 5

VMware vSphere

4.4 out of 5

Citrix XenServer provides a cost-effective, open-source solution suitable for small businesses, offering features like XenMotion and provisioning services. In comparison, VMware vSphere, though more expensive, caters to larger infrastructures with advanced centralized management and robust high availability options.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. VMware vSphere Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while VMware vSphere involves higher setup costs for more advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix XenServer offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while VMware vSphere involves higher setup costs for more advanced features.

Proxmox VE

4.3 out of 5

Proxmox VE

4.3 out of 5

Citrix XenServer excels in ease of installation for Windows-focused enterprises, integrating smoothly with Active Directory. In comparison, Proxmox VE offers open-source flexibility with minimal hardware requirements, appealing to budget-conscious users needing efficient virtualization and container-based solutions.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Proxmox VE Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Proxmox VE, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix XenServer requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Proxmox VE, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment solution.

Hyper-V

4.0 out of 5

Hyper-V

4.0 out of 5

Citrix XenServer excels in cost-effective virtualization and enterprise-level features. In comparison, Hyper-V is valued for its seamless integration with Microsoft solutions like Azure. XenServer's ease of deployment contrasts Hyper-V's dynamic memory allocation along with scalable architecture.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Hyper-V Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer setup cost is generally lower than Hyper-V, which often requires additional investment for advanced features and integration. Hyper-V offers a robust enterprise solution but may result in higher initial expenses compared to Citrix XenServer.

View comparison

Pricing

KVM

4.0 out of 5

KVM

4.0 out of 5

Citrix XenServer provides easy migration and a comprehensive console accessible via Windows, with robust disaster recovery options. In comparison, KVM's open-source model ensures high performance and scalability in Linux environments, appealing to enterprises needing flexibility and lower costs.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. KVM Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer typically involves a higher setup cost compared to KVM, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix XenServer typically involves a higher setup cost compared to KVM, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Citrix XenServer excels in virtualization with a free edition, reliable for Windows and Linux, though limited in UI and management tools. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift offers strong container management and automation for DevOps but faces challenges with documentation and integration complexity.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer offers a competitive setup cost, while Red Hat OpenShift tends to have a higher initial investment. Lower initial expenses with XenServer may suit budget-conscious users, whereas OpenShift's higher cost may reflect advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle VM VirtualBox

4.1 out of 5

Oracle VM VirtualBox

4.1 out of 5

Citrix XenServer offers advanced enterprise-grade features for resource management and VM migration. In comparison, Oracle VM VirtualBox provides versatility and ease of setup, catering well to desktop use. Tech buyers might prefer XenServer for complex environments or VirtualBox for user-friendly virtualization.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer's setup cost is higher with more complex initial configuration, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox offers a more affordable setup with simpler implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix XenServer's setup cost is higher with more complex initial configuration, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox offers a more affordable setup with simpler implementation.

Nutanix AHV Virtualization

4.3 out of 5

Nutanix AHV Virtualization

4.3 out of 5

Citrix XenServer attracts buyers with its feature-rich free edition, enabling VM migration and directory integration. In comparison, Nutanix AHV offers seamless storage integration and no licensing fees, appealing to enterprises aiming to consolidate resources and streamline operations effectively.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization Report

Pricing

Citrix XenServer has a low initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, whereas Nutanix AHV Virtualization offers a more expensive setup with advanced features, highlighting a trade-off between affordability and comprehensive capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle VM

4.0 out of 5

Oracle VM

4.0 out of 5

Oracle VM offers seamless integration with Oracle's ecosystem and excels in database optimization. In comparison, Citrix XenServer stands out for ease of use and cost-effective virtualization in diverse environments, making it appealing to small to medium businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM Report

Pricing

Oracle VM often incurs higher setup costs compared to Citrix XenServer, offering a more comprehensive initial investment, whereas XenServer typically presents a more economical setup option, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV

3.9 out of 5

RHEV

3.9 out of 5

RHEV offers robust scalability and open-source flexibility, appealing to large-scale deployments. In comparison, Citrix XenServer impresses with advanced management features and seamless integration, attracting businesses prioritizing operational efficiency. Both solutions provide unique values, catering to diverse technological and budgetary needs.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV Report

Pricing

RHEV setup cost is generally higher compared to Citrix XenServer, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

RHEV setup cost is generally higher compared to Citrix XenServer, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

IBM PowerVM

4.3 out of 5

IBM PowerVM

4.3 out of 5

PowerVM excels with advanced resource management and security features, justifying its higher cost. In comparison, XenServer offers cost-effective virtualization with easy Citrix integration, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking competitive pricing and compatibility with diverse environments without sacrificing key functionalities.

Download Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM Report

Pricing

IBM PowerVM setup costs are high with robust initial investments, while Citrix XenServer offers a more affordable setup with cost-effective implementation options.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM PowerVM setup costs are high with robust initial investments, while Citrix XenServer offers a more affordable setup with cost-effective implementation options.

Show 3 more products

Related categories

Server Virtualization Software

PaaS Clouds

Container Management