Citrix XenServer and KVM compete in the virtualization market. KVM has an edge due to its flexibility and compatibility with diverse infrastructures.
Features: Citrix XenServer offers full-featured free access, Windows-based management, and XenMotion for VM migration. KVM provides low cost, high scalability, and excellent integration with Linux environments.
Room for Improvement: Citrix XenServer has issues with high resource use, limited Linux support, and a Windows-dependent setup. KVM faces challenges in ease of use, lacking out-of-the-box management features, and better Windows guest support is needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix provides good customer support, albeit with some delays, whereas KVM relies on community support and can offer enterprise-level assistance for a cost.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix XenServer's advanced features and support can be costly but valuable for large deployments. KVM's free open-source model, only charging for enterprise support, is budget-friendly.
My clients generally maintain their Citrix infrastructure without shifting, suggesting stability and reliable operation as Citrix XenServer is fully established.
KVM definitely saves costs since it is open-source and does not obligate us to pay for licenses as necessary with other virtualization solutions.
They do not provide adequate support for midsize businesses.
Customer support can be complex and slow, especially when dealing with Unicom.
Since being acquired, Citrix's customer service has experienced delays in response time.
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
Familiarity with Linux can enhance its performance and usability.
Citrix needs to improve the hypervisor, specifically in security and performance.
Although the product is technically competitive, it is not widely known or used due to poor marketing.
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
It is cheaper compared to its competitors.
The pricing is considered not expensive.
The pricing and licensing policy of Citrix XenServer is not transparent and quite confusing.
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
It provides secure access to applications and resources, which is crucial for us and our clients.
It is user-friendly and easy to deploy, making it an attractive option.
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
Citrix XenServer provides virtualization with high availability and robust security, offering seamless VM migration and centralized management through XenCenter. Its expansive compatibility and integration enhance its appeal, particularly for SMBs.
Citrix XenServer is recognized for its user-friendly virtualization capabilities, facilitating dynamic scalability and efficient resource management. It supports a wide range of operating systems and integrates with Citrix solutions for improved operations. Businesses benefit from its affordability and ease of deployment. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in third-party tool integration, network and backup management, and storage flexibility. High costs, limited Linux support, system complexity, technical support, and hardware compatibility remain challenges. An updated and intuitive interface is in demand for more seamless operations across platforms.
What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?In diverse industries, Citrix XenServer is leveraged for server and desktop virtualization, cloud automation, and infrastructure management. Many deploy it for virtual desktop infrastructure, application delivery, on-premises data centers, and to support Citrix application delivery like XenApp and XenDesktop. Enterprises migrating from VMware often find Citrix XenServer cost-efficient for these applications, serving as a main computing platform for enterprise applications including ERP systems and SQL Servers.
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
