Sophos MDR and SentinelOne Vigilance compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Based on features, Sophos has the upper hand with its integration capabilities and centralized management console, while SentinelOne stands out for advanced detection and low system resource usage.
Features: Sophos MDR offers vital integration capabilities across multiple security products, providing a centralized management console with threat containment and rollback features. Its strength lies in its continuous monitoring and protection against malware. SentinelOne Vigilance is known for advanced user behavior analytics, an efficient ransomware rollback on Windows, and low system resource footprint. It integrates well with third-party EDR tools, offering a streamlined detection process.
Room for Improvement: Sophos MDR requires enhancements in multitenancy support, integration with MDM solutions, and report generation features. More affordable pricing models and advanced AI capabilities are also desired by users. SentinelOne needs to improve resource usage efficiency during deployment and better integration with SaaS platforms. Enhancements in Linux and Mac rollback features and predictive analytics are areas where users seek upgrades.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions support cloud and on-premises deployments. Sophos MDR provides comprehensive options and offers responsive support praised for its issue resolution and multi-language capabilities. SentinelOne Vigilance has versatile deployment options, but users report challenges with resource use during setup. However, it is noted for commendable customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Sophos MDR is considered mid-range priced, with flexible subscription plans and a notable ROI from reduced incident response times. Some users find its cost on the higher side. SentinelOne Vigilance offers reasonable pricing compared to next-gen solutions, with a per-device model beneficial for smaller setups, providing substantial ROI through robust features. Both platforms could improve pricing accessibility for diverse market segments.
For the overall return on investment, both time and money, I would say it is a full 20.
It allows them to have access to a SOC-like service without the associated costs.
On average, these claims are 97.5% lower compared to those relying solely on endpoint protection.
I would rate the actual technical support from SentinelOne Vigilance a nine.
Sophos offers different support levels depending on the severity of the issues, which ensures timely assistance.
I would rate the technical support by Sophos at nine point five out of ten.
Users have noted that the solution can easily scale to accommodate an increasing number of protected devices without the need for redeployment.
Sophos MDR seems to have no limitations on scalability.
I find it absolutely stable.
Overall, the stability of Sophos MDR is a strong point, contributing to its effectiveness in managing real-time threats and maintaining a secure environment.
I would rate the stability as very reliable.
Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once.
Introducing more detailed and customizable reporting and analytics features could help organizations better understand their security posture and the effectiveness of the MDR service.
The pricing, licensing, and setup costs in general are quite affordable.
The solution is cost-efficient, especially for small customers who cannot justify the expense of setting up an internal SOC.
The pricing of Sophos MDR is reasonable and competitive, scoring about nine out of ten.
I am actually able to synthesize machine learning with human experience to manage complex threats in IRs.
The important features of Sophos MDR include detection and response capabilities.
The most valuable feature of Sophos MDR is that it offers a monitoring service directly from the OEM, which is beneficial for SMB customers who cannot afford a SOC.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Sophos MDR | 5.9% |
| SentinelOne Vigilance | 5.8% |
| Other | 88.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
SentinelOne Vigilance provides reliable endpoint security with features like behavior analytics and ransomware protection, offering organizations capabilities such as third-party management and effective malware detection while maintaining low resource usage and kernel-independent operations.
SentinelOne Vigilance stands out by offering robust endpoint protection, utilizing machine learning and Storyline technology to enhance malware detection and prevention. Its rollback capabilities, impressive scalability, ease of use, and comprehensive analytics are consistently acknowledged. Monthly reports offer insightful analytics, and its 100% ransomware recovery commitment adds assurance. However, areas for improvement include better integration with Microsoft Windows, SIEM, and SOAR solutions, along with enhanced dashboard control and memory forensics.
What features make SentinelOne Vigilance effective?SentinelOne Vigilance is widely implemented within industries for endpoint protection and malware detection in environments like private clouds and on-premises, aiding ransomware prevention and integration with SOC teams. Businesses across sectors rely on it to protect infrastructure and manage endpoint activities effectively.
Threat Notification Isn’t the Solution – It’s a Starting Point
Other managed detection and response (MDR) services simply notify you of attacks or suspicious events. Then it’s up to you to manage things from there.
With Sophos MTR, your organization is backed by an elite team of threat hunters and response experts who take targeted actions on your behalf to neutralize even the most sophisticated threats.
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
